Drawing on qualitative interviews and fieldwork, this paper examines the risk factors that lead families into mortgage default and foreclosure risk. While neoliberal ideology and policy recognize lower-income families as at greater risk, in this paper we argue that immigrants and women experience particular risks – separation and divorce, the expense of remittances, poorer treatment in rental markets, and conflicting experience of ownership between the United States and country of origin. When these differences are ignored, social policies cannot respond adequately to the disproportionate risk that women and immigrants face to homeownership.
AllenR (2011) Who experiences foreclosures? The characteristics of households experiencing a foreclosure in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Housing Studies26(6): 845–866.
2.
BeckerG (1957) The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Center for Housing Policy (2004) Working Families with Children: A Closer Look at Homeownership Trends. Available (consulted 20 November 2011) at: nhc.org/pdf/pub_cp_05_04.pdf
10.
ChristieH (2000) Mortgage arrears and gender inequalities. Housing Studies15(6): 877–905.
11.
DarkeJ (1994) Women and the meaning of home. In: GilroyRWoodsR (eds) Housing Women. London: Routledge, 9–25.
LandisJMcClureK (2010) Rethinking federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association76(3): 319–348.
23.
LibmanKFieldsDSaegertS (2012) Housing and health: a social ecological perspective on the US foreclosure crisis. Housing, Theory, and Society29(1): 1–24.
RoheWQuerciaR (2003) Individual and Neighborhood Impacts of Neighborhood Reinvestment’s Homeownership Pilot Program. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
31.
RonaldR (2008) The Ideology of Home Ownership: Homeowner Societies and the Role of Housing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
RossLMSquiresGD (2011) The personal costs of subprime lending and the foreclosure crisis: a matter of trust, insecurity, and institutional deception. Social Science Quarterly92(1): 140–163.
33.
RossiPWeberE (1996) The social benefits of homeownership: empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate7(1): 1–35.
34.
SaegertSEvansGW (2003) Poverty, housing niches, and health in the United States. Journal of Social Issues59: 569–589.
35.
SaegertSFieldsDLibmanK (2009) Deflating the dream: radical risk and the neoliberalization of homeownership. Journal of Urban Affairs31(3): 297–317.
36.
SantiagoAMGalsterGCTuckerCM. (2011) Be it ever so humble, there’s no place like home: the experiences of recent, low-income minority homebuyers. In: SilvermanRPattersonK (eds) Fair and Affordable Housing in the United States: Trends, Outcomes, Future Directions. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 289–342.
37.
ShapiroT (2005) The Hidden Costs of Being African American: How Wealth Perpetuates Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
ShlayAB (2006) Low-income homeownership: American dream or delusion?Urban Studies43(3): 511–531.
39.
SilvermanRBPattersonKL (2011) The four horsemen of the fair housing apocalypse: a critique of fair housing policy in the USA. Critical Sociology38(1):123–140.
40.
SmockPManningWGuptaS (1999) The effect of marriage and divorce on women’s economic well-being. American Sociological Review64(6): 794–812.
VentryDJ (2010) The accidental deduction: a history and critique of the tax subsidy for mortgage interest. Law and Contemporary Problems73(1): 233–284.
