This article examines how citizenship can be deployed as a technology of conduct, and how it combines with the technique of empowerment in instituting the behavioural norms that constitute a neo-liberal social order. It conducts a detailed analysis of policy innovations in the Republic of Ireland, where children have recently been recognized as ‘active citizens’. This field of innovation is framed by the idea that children should be listened to and included in the decisions affecting their lives. The fact that this concerns children is important, because governing children is a way of acting upon the future. Moreover, governing the future is not a matter of reducing inequalities, but of ensuring the inclusion of all into Foucault’s neo-liberal ‘game between inequalities’. In cases of failure, the fault lies with the individual player, not with the game.
BaumanZ (2002) Society Under Siege. Cambridge: Polity.
6.
BaumanZ (2009) Living on Borrowed Time: Conversations with Citlali Rovirosa-Madrazo. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
BellV (1993) Governing childhood: neo-liberalism and the law. Economy and Society22(3): 390–405.
8.
BergerJ (1972) Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.
9.
BottomoreT (1992) Citizenship and social class, forty years on. In: MarshallTHBottomoreT (eds) Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto, 55–93.
10.
BurneyE (2005) Making People Behave. Abingdon: Willan.
11.
Cardno Acil (2008) Empowerment. Cardno Acil Proprietary Limited. Available (consulted 5 October 2008) at: http://www.acil.com.au/glossary.htm
12.
CastellsR (2003) From Manual Workers to Wage Labourers: Transformation of the Social Question. Translated by BoydR. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction.
13.
CavalloD (1981) Muscles and Morals. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
Children’s Rights Alliance (1997) Small Voices: Vital Rights. Dublin: Children’s Rights Alliance.
15.
CleggSR (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
16.
CoalterFTaylorJ (2001) Realising the Potential of Cultural Services: The Case for Play. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Leisure Research. London: Local Government Association Publications.
17.
Cole-HamiltonIHarropAStreetC (2002) The Value of Children’s Play and Play Provision: A Systematic Review of the Literature. London: New Policy Institute.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (1998a) Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Ireland. (CRC/C/15/Add.85) Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
20.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (1998b) Consideration of Reports of States Parties: Initial Report of Ireland. (CRC/C/SR.438) Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
21.
CruikshankB (1994) The will to empower: technologies of citizenship and the war on poverty. Socialist Review23(4): 29–55.
22.
CullingfordC (1992) Children and Society. London and New York, NY: Cassell.
23.
CunninghamCJJonesMA (1999) The playground: a confession of failure. Built Environment25(1): 11–17.
24.
Department of Foreign Affairs (1996) Initial Report of States Parties: Ireland. (CRC/C/11/Add.12) Dublin: Department of Foreign Affairs.
25.
Department of the Taoiseach (2003) Sustaining Progress: Social Partnership Agreement 2003–2005. Department of the Taoiseach. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
26.
DevineD (2002) Children’s citizenship and the structuring of adult-child relations in the primary school. Childhood9(3): 303–320.
27.
DonzelotJ (2008) Michel Foucault and liberal intelligence. Economy and Society37(1): 115–134.
28.
EliasN (2000) The Civilising Process. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish. London: Penguin.
30.
FoucaultM (1983) The subject and power. In: DreyfusHLRabinowP (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 208–228.
31.
FoucaultM (1997) On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work in progress. In: RabinowP (ed.) Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. New York, NY: The New Press, 253–280.
32.
FoucaultM (2000) Omnes et singulatim: toward a critique of political reason. In: FaubionJD (ed.) Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3: Power. New York, NY: The New Press, 298–325.
33.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GagenEA (2004) Making America flesh: physicality and nationhood in early twentieth-century physical education reform. Cultural Geographies11(4): 417–442.
35.
GarlandD (1985) Punishment and Welfare. Aldershot: Gower.
36.
HowellO (2008) Skatepark as neoliberal playground: urban governance, recreation space, and the cultivation of personal responsibility. Space and Culture11(4): 475–496.
KernanM (2005) Developing citizenship through supervised play: the Civics Institute of Ireland playgrounds, 1933–75. History of Education34(6): 675–687.
39.
LukesS (2005) Power: A Radical View, 2nd Edition. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
McKendrickJH (1999) Playgrounds in the built environment. Built Environment25(1): 5–10.
41.
McNayL (2009) Self as enterprise: dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture and Society26(6): 55–77.
42.
MarshallTH (1972) Value problems of welfare capitalism. Journal of Social Policy1(1): 15–32.
43.
MarshallTH (1992) Citizenship and social class. In: MarshallTHBottomoreT (eds) Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto, pp. 3–51.
44.
MillerPRoseN (2008) Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity.
45.
MillsCW (1956) The Power Elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
National Children’s Advisory Council (2006) Mid-Term Review of the National Children’s Strategy 2000–2010. Dublin: National Children’s Advisory Council.
47.
National Children’s Office (2000a) National Children’s Strategy: Our Children – Their Lives. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
48.
National Children’s Office (2000b) National Children’s Strategy: Our Children – Their Lives. Adapted for Children by Siobhán Parkinson. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
49.
National Children’s Office (2000c) Report on the Public Consultation. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
50.
National Children’s Office (2000d) Report to Children on the Public Consultation. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
51.
National Children’s Office (2004) Ready, Steady, Play! National Play Policy. Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
52.
National Children’s Office (2005) Ireland’s Second Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
53.
National Playing Fields Association (2000) Best Play: What Play Provision Should Do for Children. London: National Playing Fields Association, PLAYLINK, and the Children’s Play Council.
54.
O’ConnorP (2008) Irish Children and Teenagers in a Changing World. Manchester and New York, NY: Manchester University Press.
United Nations (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November.
65.
WaquantL (2009) Punishing the Poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
66.
WalbyS (1994) Is citizenship gendered?Sociology28(2): 379–395.
67.
Webb and Associates (1999) Public Policy on Children’s Play in Ireland. Dublin: Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin Institute of Technology and Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College.
