The Enron collapse in 2001 represented a high-water mark in the recent round of
corporate scandals in the United States. In response to this crisis, the US
government introduced the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Act or SOX) in July 2002. Until now,
the debates have remained silent on the political and social dimensions of the Act.
By situating the discourse of corporate governance within the context of capitalist
society, I offer an alternative explanation of the role and significance of SOX. I
argue that the pre-eminence of the corporate governance framework explains away the
deeper causes of crisis by maintaining our focus on the symptoms, such as greed on
the part of corporate executives, lack of transparency and an absence of
accountability, as opposed to the structural causes connected to neoliberal-led
restructuring of capitalist society and the contradictions therein.
Altvater, E.
(2002) The Growth Obsession.
L. Panitch
and
C. Leys
(eds) Socialist Register, pp. 73-92.
Merlin Press:
London.
2.
Augelli, E.
and
Murphy, C.
(1988) Quest for Supremacy and the Third World: A Gramscian
Analysis. Pinter:
London.
3.
Berle, A.A.
and
Means, G.C.
(1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property.
Harcourt, Brace and World: New
York.
4.
Bivens, L.J.
and
Weller, C.E.
(2005)
Corporate Governance and the `Job Loss' Recovery
. Review of Radical Political Economics37(3):
293-301.
5.
Blackburn, R.
(2002)
The Enron Debacle and the Pension Crisis
, New Left Review14(March/April): 26-51.
6.
Blair, M.
(1995) Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance
for the Twenty-First Century. The Brookings
Institution : Washington,
DC.
7.
Bourdieu, P.
(1998) Utopia of Endless Exploitation: On theEssen
ce of Neoliberalism. Le Monde Diplomatique (December). URL (consulted 3
March 2003): http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu
8.
Brancato, C.K.
(1997) Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance: Best
Practices for Increasing Corporate Value.
Irwin:
Chicago.
9.
Brennan, D.M.
(2003)
Fiduciary Capitalism, the Political Model of Corporate Governance, and the
Prospect of Stakeholder Capitalism in the United States
. Review of Radical Political Economy37(1):
39-62.
10.
Cioffi, J.W.
(2000)
State of the Art: A Review Essay on Comparative Corporate Governance
: The State of the Art and Emerging Research The American Journal of
Comparative Law48(3):
501-34.
11.
Dahl, R.
(1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory.
Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
12.
Elliot, L.A.
and
Schroth, R.J.
(2001) How Companies Lie: Why Enron is Just the Tip of the
Iceberg. Crown Business: New
York.
13.
Engelen, E.
(2002)
Corporate Governance, Property and Democracy: A Conceptual Critique of
Shareholder Ideology
. Economy and Society31(3):
391-413.
14.
Erturk, I.
,
Froud, J.
,
Johal, S.
and
Williams, K.
(2004)
Corporate Governance and Disappointment
. Review of International Political Economy11(4):
677-713.
15.
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
(2003 ) Underfunding of Private Pension Plans. FRBSF Economic
Letter, 16 June 2003. Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco: San
Francisco.
16.
Friedman, A.R.
and
Freeman-Bosworth, L.
(2001)
The PSLRA and Obtaining Early Proof of Claims Information in Securities
Class Actions
. Securities Regulation Law Journal29(3):
262-74.
17.
Frontline
(2002) Bigger than Enron: Why the Largest Business Scandal in
America is Just the Tip of the Iceberg - and Why Investors Should Care.
PBS
, Thursday 20 June 2002. URL (consulted 6 December 2003):
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/regulation/etc/credits.html
18.
Froud, J.
,
Haslam, C.
,
Johal, S.
and
Williams, K.
(2000)
Shareholder Value and Financialization: Consultancy Promises, Management
Moves
. Economy and Society29(1):
80-110.
19.
Glassman, J.K.
(2004) Risking a Serious Mistake: The Role of FASB and the
Role of Congress in Stock Options Accounting Policy. Testimony - Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs. American Enterprise
Institute: Washington,
DC.
20.
Goldstein, D.
(2000)
Hostile Takeover as Corporate Governance? Evidence from the 1980s
. Review of Political Economy12(4):
381-402.
21.
Gramsci, A.
(1992) Selections from the Prison Notebooks.
Q. Hoare
and
G.N. Smith
(eds). International Publishers: New
York.
22.
Greider, W.
(2005) The NewCol
ossus. The Nation (28 February). URL (consulted 3 March 2005):
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050228/greider
23.
Harmes, A.
(2001) Unseen Power: How Mutual Funds Threaten the Political
and Economic Wealth of Nations. Stoddart:
Toronto.
24.
Harvey, D.
(1999) The Limits to Capital.
Verso :
London.
25.
Harvey, D.
(2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford
University Press:
Oxford.
26.
Hirsch, J.
(1986) Kapitalismus ohne Alternative?VSA:
Berlin.
27.
Holloway, J.
(1995) Capital and the National State.
W. Bonefeld
and
J. Holloway
(eds) Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money,
pp. 116-40. St. Martin's Press:
New York.
28.
Hu, J.
and
Noe, T.H.
(1997)
The Insider Trading Debate
. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review
(4): 34-45.
29.
Hymer, S.
(1970)
The Efficiency (Contradictions) of Multinational Corporations
. American Economic Review60(2):
441-8.
30.
Lander, G.
(2004) What is the Sarbanes-Oxley?McGraw-Hill: New
York.
31.
Lazonick, W.
and
O'Sullivan, M.
(2000)
Maximizing Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance
. Economy and Society29(1):
1-35.
32.
Locke, J.
(1690) Second Treatise on Civil Government. URL
(consulted 12 February 2006):
http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm
33.
Longnecker, B.
(2004)
Sarbanes-Oxley: Financial Friend or Foe
? The Banking Law Journal121(7):
606-12.
34.
Luhmann, N.
(1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. [Translated by E.
King and M. Albrow] Routledge & Kegan Paul:
London.
35.
MacAvoy, P.W.
and
Millstein, I.M.
(2003) The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance. StanfordBusiness Books:
Stanford.
36.
McKinsey & Company
(2002) Director Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance.
McKinsey & Company: New
York.
37.
McKinsey & Company
(2006) Mapping the Global Capital Market: Second Annual
Report. McKinsey & Company:
New York.
38.
Manning, R.D.
(2000) Credit Card Nation: The Consequences of America's
Addiction to Credit. Basic Books:
New York.
39.
Marx, K.
(1981) Capital: Volume 3.
London: Penguin
Books.
40.
Minns, R.
(2001) The Cold War: Stock Markets versus Pensions.
Verso:
London.
41.
Mizruchi, M.S.
(2004)
Berle and Means Revisited: The Governance and Power of Large U.S.
Corporations
. Theory and Society33: 579-617.
42.
Monks, R.A.G.
and
Minow, N.
(2001) Corporate Governance, 2nd Edition.
Blackwell Publishing:
Oxford.
43.
OECD
(2005)
Pension Markets in Focus
. Newsletter, June 2005, Issue 1. URL (consulted 11 January
2006) http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/2/35063476.pdf
44.
O'Sullivan, M.
(2000) Contests for Corporate Control.
Oxford University Press:
Oxford.
45.
O'Sullivan, M.
(2003)
The Political Economy of Comparative Corporate Governance
. Review of International Political Economy10(1):
23-72.
46.
Patomäki, H.
(2001) Democratising Globalisation: The Leverage of the Tobin
Tax. Zed Books:
London.
47.
Peters, A.
(2004)
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Congress' Response to Corporate Scandals: Will
the New Rules Guarantee `Good' Governance and Avoid Future Scandals
? Nova Law Review28(2):
283-92.
48.
Piven Fox, F.
(2004) The War at Home: The Domestic Costs of Bush's
Militarism . New Press: New
York.
49.
Pollin, R.
(2003) Contours of Descent: U.S. Economic Fractures and the
Landscape of Global Austerity. Verso:
London.
50.
Ramirez, S.A.
(2000) Depoliticizing Financial Regulation.
Wil
liam & Mary Law Review 41(2). URL (consulted 2 March 2005):
http://washburnlaw.edu/faculty/ramirez-s-fulltext/2000-41wm503.htm
51.
Renner, K.
(1949) The Institutions of Private Law and their Social
Functions. Routledge & Kegan
Paul: London.
52.
Ribstein, L.E.
(2002) Market vs Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A
Critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Illinois Law and Economic Working
Papers Series. Working Paper LE02-008, September.
University of Illinois College of Law
:
Champaign
.
53.
Rupert, M.
(1997) Globalization and the Reconstruction of Common Sense
in the US.
S. Gill
and
J. Mittelman
(eds) Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, pp.
41-59.
Cambridge University Press:Cambridge
.
54.
Saad-Filho, A.
and
Johnston, D.
(eds) (2005) Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader .
Pluto Press:
London.
55.
Sale, H.A.
(1998)
Heightened Pleading and Discovery Stays: An Analysis of the Effect of the
PSLRA's Internal Standard of '33 and '34 Act Claims
. Washington University Law Quarterly76(1):
537-95.
56.
Scott, J.
(1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes.
Oxford University Press:
Oxford.
57.
Shleifer, A.
and
Vishny, R.W.
(1997)
A Survey of Corporate Governance
. The Journal of Finance52(2):
737-83.
58.
Skyes, A.
(2000) Capitalism for Tomorrow: Reuniting Ownership and
Control. Capstone Publishing:
Oxford .
59.
Soederberg, S.
(2004) The New International Financial Architecture:
Reimposing Neoliberal Dominance in the Global South.
Zed Books:
London.
60.
Soederberg, S.
(2009) Corporations, Power, and Ownership in Contemporary
Capitalism: The Politics of Governance, Activism, and Social Responsibility.
[RIPE Series in Global Political Economy]Routledge:
London.
61.
Strahota, R.D.
(2002) The Effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Directors'
Responsibilities and Liabilities. Robert D. Strahota,
Assistant Director of the Office of International Affairs, US Securities and
Exchange Commission. Prepared for Third OECD South-Eastern Europe Corporate
Governance Roundtable, Zagreb,
Croatia, 21-22 November 2002.
62.
Swedberg, R.
(2003) Principles of Economic Sociology.
Princeton University Press:
Princeton.
63.
Sweeney, J.J.
(2002) Labour Day Address, 1 September 2002,
Washington, D.C.
AFL-CIO. URL (consulted 17 February 2004):
http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/prsptm/sp09012002.cfm
64.
Taylor, M.
(2006) From Pinochet to the ThirdWay: Neoliberalism and
Social Transformation in Chile. Pluto Press:
London.
65.
Tracey, A.M.
and
Fiorelli, P.
(2004)
Nothing Concentrates the Mind Like the Prospect of a Hanging: The
Criminalization of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
. Northern Illinois University Law Review25(1):
125-50.
66.
Van den Berghe, L.and De Ridder, L.
(1999) International Standardisation of Good Corporate
Governance. Kluwer:
Boston.
67.
VanDerhei, J.L.
(2002)
The Role of Company Stock in 410(k) Plans
. Risk Management & Insurance Review5(1):
1-20.
68.
Vives, X.
(2000) Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical
Perspectives.
Cambridge University Press:Cambridge
.
69.
Wei, S.-J.
and
Milkiewicz, H.
(2003) A case of `Enronitis'? Opaque Self-Dealing and the
Global Financial Effect. Policy Brief 118. The
Brookings Institution: Washington,
DC.
70.
Weismann, M.M.
(2004)
Corporate Transparency or Congressional Window-Dressing? The Case Against
Sarbanes-Oxley as a Means to Avoid Another Corporate Debacle: The Failed
Attempt to Revive Meaningful Regulatory Oversight
. Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance10(1):
98-137.
71.
Westbrook, D.A.
(2004)
Telling All: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Ideal of Transparency
. Michigan State Law Review2004(2):
441-62.
72.
White House
(2002) Remarks by the President at the Signing of H.R. 3763,
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 30 July 2002,
Washington, DC: White
House. URL (consulted 14 June 2006):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/07/20020730-1.html
