The theoretical constructs indicate that, for a 70kg high transport anephric patient, adequate dialysis requires a weekly KtN of 2.0 2.25 (1–5). The prospective cohort studies, with one exception, suggest that better survival requires a weekly KtN >1.89 (7–11). Multivariate analyses confirm the statistical association of patient survival with higher Kt/V(14–17) and with higher CCr (16,17). The use of initial values in one study (15), mean values in two studies (14,16), and time -dependent values in another (17) makes comparison difficult. In general, higher values are associated with better survival and are consistent with the values suggested by theoretical constructs (i.e., KtN 2.0 2.25).
PopovichR.P., MoncriefJ.W., DechardJ.B., BomarJ.B., PyleW.K.The definition of a novel portable/wearable equilibrium peritoneal dialysis technique.ASAIO Trans1976; 5: 64.
2.
PopovichR.P., MoncriefJ.W.Kinetic modeling of peritoneal transport.Contrib Nephrol1979; 17: 59–72.
3.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., SiglerM.H., GilgoreG.S.A quantitative approach to the CAPD prescription.Perit Dial Bull1985; 5: 152–6.
4.
KeshaviahP.R., NolphK.D., Van StoneJ.C.The peak urea concentration hypothesis: A urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.Perit Dial Int1989; 9: 257–60.
5.
KeshaviahP.Adequacy of CAPD: A quantitative approach.Kidney Int1992; 42(Suppl 38): S160–4.
6.
TwardowskiZ.J., NolphK.D.Peritoneal dialysis: How much is enough?Semin Dial1988; 1: 75–6.
7.
BlakeP.G., SombolosK., AbrahamG.Lack of correlation between urea kinetic indices and clinical outcomes in CAPD patients.Kidney Int1991; 39: 700–6.
8.
BlakeP.G., BalaskasE., BlakeR., OreopoulosD.G.Urea kinetics has limited relevance in assessing adequacy of dialysis in CAPD. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1992; 8: 65–70.
9.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., BrownJ.Urea kinetic modeling is an appropriate assessment of adequacy.Semin Dial1992; 5: 189–92.
10.
De AlvaroF., BajoM.A., Alvarez-UdeF.Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: Does KtN have the same predictive value as in HD? A multicenter study. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1992; 8: 93–7.
11.
LameireN.H., VanholderR., VeytD., LambertM.C., RingoirS.A longitudinal five-year survey of kinetic parameters in CAPD patients.Kidney Int1992; 42: 426–32.
12.
BrandesJ.C., PieringW.F., BeresJ.A., BlumenthalS.S., FritscheC.Clinical outcome of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis predicted by urea and creatinine kinetics.J Am Soc Nephrol1992; 2: 1430–5.
13.
ArkoucheW., DelawariE., MyH.Quantification of the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int1993; 13(Suppl 13): S215–18.
14.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., BrownJ.M.Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD. A 5 year longitudinal study. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 181–5.
15.
GenestierS., HedelinG., SchafferP., FallerB.Prognostic factors in CAPD patients: A retrospective study of a 10 year period.Nephrol Dial Transplant1995; 10: 1905–11.
16.
MaiorcaR., BrunoriG., ZubaniR.Predictive value of dialysis adequacy and nutritional indices for mortality and morbidity in CAPD and HD patients. A longi tudinal study.Nephrol Dial Transplant1995; 10: 2295–305.
17.
ChurchillD.N., TaylorD.W., KeshaviahP.R.For the Canada-USA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 198–207.
