Diaz-BuxoJ.A.Comparison of peritonitis rates with CCPD, manual CAPD, Y -sets, O-sets, UV devices and sterile weld. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1989; 5: 223–6.
2.
VergerC., LuzarM.A.In vitro study of CAPD Y-Iine system. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1986; 2: 160–4.
3.
de FijterC.W.H., VerbrughH.A., OeP.L.Peritoneal defenses in continuous ambulatory versus continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis.Kidney Int1992; 42: 947–50.
4.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., BrownJ.M., SiglerM.H., RaimondoJ.Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome in CAPD: A five-year longitudinal study. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 181–5.
5.
GotchF.The application of urea kinetic modeling to CAPD. In: La GrecaG., RoncoC., FerrianiM., eds. Peritoneal dialysis.Milano: Wichtig Editore, 1991: 47–51.
6.
Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical out comes.J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 198–207.
7.
LysaghtM.J., VoneshE.F., GotchF.The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function.ASAIO Trans1991; 37: 598–604.
8.
NolphK.D., JensenR.A., KhannaR., TwardowskiZ.J.Weight limitations for weekly urea clearances using various exchange volumes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int1994; 14: 261–4.
9.
Diaz-BuxoJ.A.Enhancement of peritoneal dialysis: The PD Plus concept.Am J Kidney Dis1996; 27: 92–8.
10.
BrandesJ.C., PackardW.J., WattersS.K., FritscheC.Optimization of dialysate flow and mass transfer during automated peritoneal dialysis.Am J Kidney Dis1995; 25: 603–10.
11.
ShostakA., GotloibL.Increased peritoneal permeability to albumin in streptozocin diabetic rats.Kidney Int1996; 49: 705–14.
12.
LowrieE.G., HuangW.H., LewN.L.Death risk predictors among peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients: A preliminary comparison.Am J Kidney Dis1995; 26: 220–8.
13.
LindsayR.M., SpannerE., HeidenheimR.P.Which comes first, KtN or PCR -chicken or egg?Kidney Int1992; 43: S32–6.
14.
USRDS Annual Data Report of the National Institute of Health, 14 April 1995, Bethesda, Maryland.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases1995.
15.
IsmailN., HakimR.M., OreopoulosD.G., PatrikareaA.Renal replacement therapies in the elderly: Part 1. Hemodialysis and chronic peritoneal dialysis.Am J Kidney Dis1993; 22: 759–82.
16.
RossC.J., RutskyE.A.Dialysis modality selection in the elderly patient with end-stage renal disease: Advantages and disadvantages of peritoneal dialysis. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 11–17.
17.
ViglinoG., GrassoP.G., MarianoF., CavalliP.L.Need of a partner on home peritoneal dialysis (HPD): Incidence and an alternative choice. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1989; 5: 67–71.
18.
NolphK.D., LindbladA.S., NovakJ.W., SteinbergS.M.Experiences with the elderly in the National CAPD Registry. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 33–7.
19.
Diaz-BuxoJ.A.The place for cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis in geriatric patients: Comparison with hemodialysis.Geriatr Nephrol Urol1993; 3: 7–13.
20.
SchleiferC.R.Peritoneal dialysis in nursing homes. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 86–91.