Abstract
Objective
Peritonitis is considered an acceptable and controllable risk in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). In contrast, peritonitis due to visceralleakage represents a true “abdominal catastrophe” because of striking morbidity and mortality. To delineate the incidence, causes, and outcomes of catastrophic peritonitis, we compared patients who developed peritonitis due to documented visceral leakage with patients who developed peritonitis due to enteric organisms without evidence of visceral leakage.
Design
Retrospective chart review.
Setting
PD Unit located in tertiary care referral center.
Patients
230 patients treated by PD between January 1988 and June 1996.
Main Outcome Measures
All episodes of PD-related peritonitis occurring over an 8-year period. Hospital course of all patients with or without renal failure who were treated at University Hospitals of Cleveland for ischemic bowel disease, cholecystitis, viscus perforation, or diverticulitis.
Results
Anatomically documented visceral injury caused 32.5% of episodes of enteric bacterial peritonitis in 72 patients between January 1988 and June 1996. The overall incidence of this “abdominal catastrophe” was 11.3%, or 26 of a total of 230 patients treated by PD. Of the 26 patients, 50% died, 30.7% survived but switched permanently to hemodialysis, and only 19.2% remained on, or returned to, PD. Compared to renal failure patients treated by hemodialysis or transplantation and to nonrenal failure patients, the incidence of abdominal catastrophe was 20 -60 times greater in patients treated by PD.
Conclusions
Evidence for injury of an abdominal organ should be sought in all patients treated by PD who develop peritonitis with enteric organisms. Surgical intervention is definitive for diagnosis, and if performed early may reduce morbidity and mortality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
