Searching for Evidence-Based Medical Practice

Anonymous. University. How to read clinical journals. Part I: why to read them and how to start reading them critically. Can Med Assoc J 1981; 124: 5, 555–8.

Graham-Smith D. Evidence-based medicine: Socratic dissent. BMJ 1995; 310: 1126–7.

Evidence-based medicine in its place (Editorial). Lancet 1995; 346: 785.

Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268: 2420–5.

Bero L.A. , Galbraith A. , Rennie D. The publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1135–40.

Haines A. , Jones R. Implementing findings of research. Br Med J 1994; 308: 1488–92.

Sillagy C. , Lancaster T. The Cochrane Collaboration in Primary Care: An international resource for evidencebased practice of family medicine. Fam Med 1995; 27: 302–5.

Oxman AD , (ed) Section VI: Preparing and maintaining systematic reviews: The Cochrane Collaboration handbook. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration, 1994: 43–55.

Detsky S.A. , Naglie G.I. Subgroup analyses: primary and secondary (Editorial). ACP J Club 1995; May/June: A12–14.

Chalmers I. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. In: Warren K.S. , Mosteller F. , (eds). Doing more good than harm: the evaluation of health care interventions. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1993: 153–63.

Freemantle N. Dealing with uncertainty: will science solve the problems of resource allocation in the U.K. NHS? Soc Sci Med (England), 1995; 40(10): 1365–70.

Silagy C.A. Developing a register of randomized controlled trials in primary care. Br Med J 1993; 306: 897–900.

Dickersin K. , Hewitt P. , Mutch L. , Chalmers T.C. Perusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database. Control Clin Trials 1985; 6: 306–17.

Kleijnen J. , Knipschild P. The comprehensiveness of MEDLINE and EMBASE computer searches. Pharm Weekbl Sci 1992; 14(5): 316–20.

Light R.J. , Pillemar D.B. Numbers and narrative. In: Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984: 104–43.

Cooper H. , Hedges LV (eds). The handbook of research synthesis. Part V: Statistically describing and combining studies. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 193–281.

Fleiss J.L. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1993; 2: 121–45.

Hedges L.V. , Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta analysis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1985.

Emerson J.D. Combining estimates of the odds ratio: the state of the art. Stat Methods Med Res 1994; 3: 157–78.

Galbraith R.F. A note on graphical presentation of estimates odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 1988; 7: 889–94.

Forrow L. , Taylor W.C. , Arnold R.M. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Ann Intern Med 1992; 92: 121–4.

Redelmeir D.A. , Tversky A. Discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and groups. N Engl J Med 1990; 322(16): 1162–4.

Laupacis A. , Naylor C.D. , Sackett D.L. How should the results of clinical trials be presented to clinicians (Editorial)? ACP J Club 1992; May/June: A12–14.

Laupacis A.L. , Sackett D.L. , Roberts R.S. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1728–33.

Fouque D. , Laville M. , Haugh M. , Boissel P.J. Systematic reviews and their roles in promoting evidence-based medicine in renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2398–401.