VanholderC., RingoirS.Adequacy of dialysis: a critical analysis.Kidney Int1992; 42: 540–53.
5.
GokalR., JakubowskiC., KingJ.Outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: 4-year analysis of a prospective multicentre study.Lancet1987; 14: 1105–9.
6.
SerkesK., BlaggC., NolphK.Comparison of patient and technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis: a multicenter study.Perit Dial Int1990; 10: 15–19.
7.
MaiorcaR., VoneshE., CancariniG.A six-year comparison of patientand technique survivals in CAPD and hemodialysis.Kidney Int1988; 34: 518–24.
8.
PopovichR.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Proceedings af the 11th Annual Contractors Conference. Artificial Kidney Program of the National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism and Digestive Diseases. DHEW Publication no. (NIH) 79–1442: 25–8,1978.
9.
KeshaviahP., NolphK.D.The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).Perit Dial Int1989; 9: 257–60.
10.
GotchF.Application of urea kinetic modeling to adequacy of CAPD therapy. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 178–80.
11.
GotchF.The application of urea kinetic modeling to CAPD. In: La GrecaG., RoncoC., FerianiM., eds. Peritoneal dialysis.Milano: Wichtig Editore, 1991: 47–51.
12.
NolphK., MooreH., TwardowskiZ.Cross-sectional assessment of weekly urea and creatinine clearances in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.ASAIO J1992; 38: M139–42.
13.
GotchF., GentilleD., SchoenfeldP.CAPD in current clinical practice. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1993; 9: 69–72.
14.
HussarD.Patient noncompliance.J Am Pharm Assoc1975; N515: 183–90.
15.
CockcroftD., GaultM.Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.Nephron1976; 16: 31–41.
16.
KeenM., LippsB., GotchF.The measured creatinine generation rate in CAPD suggests only 78% of prescribed dialysis is delivered. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1993; 9: 73–5.
GotchF., SchoenfeldP., GentilleD.The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is not a realistic measure of peritoneal clearance (PC) (Abstract).JASN1991; 2: 361.
19.
ChurchillD.Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis and other outcome-related risk factors: a critical appraisal.Semin Dial1992; 5: 142–6.
20.
TeehanB., SchleifferC., BrownJ.Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD: a five-year longitudinal study. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1990; 6: 172–9.
21.
KeshaviahP.Quantitative approaches to prescribing peritoneal dialysis. In: La GrecaG., RoncoC., FerianiM., eds. Peritoneal dialysis.Milano: Wichtig Editore, 1991: 53–60.
22.
TattersalJ., DoyleS., GreenwoodR.Kinetic modelling and underdialysis in CAPD patientsNephrolDial Transplant1993; 8: 535–8.
23.
BlakeP., SombolosK., AbrahamG.Lack of correlation between urea kinetic indices and clinical outcome in CAPD patients.Kidney Int1991; 39: 700–6.
24.
HartyJ., BoultonH., HeelyN.Limitations of kinetic models as markers of dialysis adequacy in CAPD (Abstract).Perit Dial Int1993; 13(Suppl): S38.
25.
BergstromJ., LindholmB.Nutrition and adequacy of dialysis. How do hemodialysis and CAPD compare?Kidney Int1993; 43(Suppl 40): 839–50.
26.
YoungG., KoppleJ., LindholmB.Nutritional assessment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: an international study.Am J Kidney Dis1991; 17: 462–71.
27.
LindsayR., SpannerC., HeidenheimR.Which comes first: KtN or PCR -chicken or egg?Kidney Int1992; 42(Suppl 38): 532–526.
28.
GotchF.Dependence of normalized protein catabolic rate on KtN in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: not a mathematical artifact.Perit Dial Int1993; 13: 173–5.