Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-related peritonitis is a rare but serious complication in patients receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). Early diagnosis is difficult due to the low sensitivity and delayed results of conventional microscopy and culture methods. MTB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in PD effluent is recommended as a diagnostic adjunct, but real-world data remain limited. We conducted a 20-year single-centre retrospective study in a tuberculosis-endemic region to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of MTB-PCR in PD effluent. Among 372 tests, MTB-PCR demonstrated sensitivity 50%, specificity 100%, negative-predictive value 94.6% and positive-predictive value 100%, using diagnoses based on a composite of clinical and laboratory criteria as the reference standard. Sensitivity showed a numerical trend of improvement from 33.3% with earlier assays to 50–85.7% with newer assays. Of 72 patients with culture-confirmed MTB-PD peritonitis, 13 (18.1%) were diagnosed via MTB-PCR. Compared to those diagnosed by non-PCR methods, MTB-PCR-diagnosed patients had shorter time to anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation (median 8 vs. 22 days, p ≤ 0.001) and shorter hospital stay from presentation to treatment (median 8 vs. 17 days, p = 0.008). They also had a numerically lower rate of PD catheter removal prior to treatment initiation [0/13 (0%) vs. 9/53 patients (17.0%), p = 0.186]. Rates of permanent transfer to haemodialysis and all-cause mortality at 1 year were similar among the two groups. These findings suggest a role for early MTB-PCR testing in suspected MTB-PD peritonitis. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings and optimize diagnostic strategies.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
