TreharneCLiuFXAriciM, et al.Peritoneal dialysis and in-centre haemodialysis: a cost-utility analysis from a UK payer perspective. Appl Health Econ Health Policy2014; 12: 409–420.
2.
WalkerRMarshallMRMortonRL, et al.The cost-effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared with facility haemodialysis: a systematic review of full economic evaluations. Nephrology (Carlton)2014; 19: 459–470.
3.
FergusonTWWhitlockRHBamforthRJ, et al.Cost-utility of dialysis in Canada: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and nondialysis treatment of kidney failure. Kidney Med2021; 3: 20–30.e1.
4.
LinEChengXSChinKK, et al.Home dialysis in the prospective payment system era. J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 28: 2993–3004.
5.
ANZDATA Registry. 43rd report, Chapter 2: Prevalence of renal replacement therapy for end stage kidney disease.
6.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Annual statistics on organ replacement in Canada: dialysis, transplantation and donation, 2010 to 2019. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information.
7.
United Kingdom Renal Registry. UK Renal Registry 22nd Annual Report.
8.
LinEGinsburgPBChertowGM, et al.The “advancing American kidney health” executive order: challenges and opportunities for the large dialysis organizations. Am J Kidney Dis2020; 76: 731–734.
9.
BrownEA. Influence of reimbursement policies on dialysis modality distribution around the world. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2019; 14: 10–12.
10.
MannsBAgarJWMBiyaniM, et al.Can economic incentives increase the use of home dialysis?Nephrol Dial Transplant2019; 34: 731–741.
11.
BlakePGMcCormickBBTajiL, et al.Growing home dialysis: the Ontario Renal Network Home Dialysis Initiative 2012-2019. Perit Dial Int2021. DOI: 10.1177/08968608211012805.
12.
PravoverovLVZhengSParikhR, et al.Trends associated with large-scale expansion of peritoneal dialysis within an integrated care delivery model. JAMA Intern Med2019; 179: 1537–1542.
13.
BéchadeCLobbedezTIvarsenP, et al.Assisted peritoneal dialysis for older people with end-stage renal disease: the French and Danish experience. Perit Dial Int2015; 35: 663–666.
14.
OliverMJSalengerP. Making assisted peritoneal dialysis a reality in the united states: a Canadian and American viewpoint. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2020; 15: 566–568.
15.
RopeRWPivertKAParkerMG, et al.Education in nephrology fellowship: a survey-based needs assessment. J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 28: 1983–1990.
16.
GuptaNTaber-HightEBMillerBW. Perceptions of home dialysis training and experience among us nephrology fellows. Am J Kidney Dis2021; 77: 713–718.e1.
17.
PrinceLKY’BarboBCNeeR, et al.The peritoneal dialysis orders objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a formative assessment for nephrology fellows. Perit Dial Int2021. DOI: 10.1177/08968608211000542.
18.
Van den BoschJWarrenDSRutherfordPA. Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization. Patient Prefer Adherence2015; 9: 1279–1291.
19.
ShuklaAMBozorgmehriSRuchiR, et al.Utilization of CMS pre-ESRD kidney disease education services and its associations with the home dialysis therapies. Perit Dial Int2020. DOI: 10.1177/0896860820975586.
20.
MehrotraRSoohooMRivaraMB, et al.Racial and ethnic disparities in use of and outcomes with home dialysis in the united states. J Am Soc Nephrol2016; 27: 2123–2134.
21.
CafazzoJALeonardKEastyAC, et al.Patient-perceived barriers to the adoption of nocturnal home hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2009; 4: 784–789.
22.
KansalSKMorfinJAWeinhandlED. Survival and kidney transplant incidence on home versus in-center hemodialysis, following peritoneal dialysis technique failure. Perit Dial Int2019; 39: 25–34.