DonaghyEAthertonHHammersleyV, et al.Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract2019; 69(686): e586–e594.
3.
HammersleyVDonaghyEParkerR, et al.Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract2019; 69(686): e595–e604.
4.
WalkerRCTongAHowardK, et al.Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform2019; 124: 78–85.
5.
StevensonJKCampbellZCWebsterAC, et al.eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019; 8: CD012379.
6.
CartwrightEJZs GohZFooM, et al.eHealth interventions to support patients in delivering and managing peritoneal dialysis at home: a systematic review. Perit Dial Int. Epub ahead of print 17 April 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0896860820918135.
7.
KoraishyFMRohatgiR. Telenephrology: an emerging platform for delivering renal health care. Am J Kidney Dis2020; 76(3): 417–426.
8.
WalkerRCTongAHowardK, et al.Clinicians’ experiences with remote patient monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: a semi-structured interview study. Perit Dial Int2020; 40(2): 202–208.
9.
WalkerRCTongAHowardK, et al.Patients' and caregivers' expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis: A qualitative interview study. Perit Dial Int2020; 40(6): 540–547.