U.S. Renal Data System.USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007: 239–54. [Available at: www.usrds.org]
2.
ERA-EDTA Registry 2005 Annual Report.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; June 2007.
3.
CouchoudC., SavoyeE., FrimatL., RyckelynckJ.P., ChalemY., VergerC.; for the Working Group “Peritoneal Dialysis” of the French REIN Registry. Variability of case mix and peritoneal dialysis selection in fifty-nine French districts.Perit Dial Int2008; 28: 509–17.
4.
ViglinoG., NeriL., AlloattiS., CabidduG., CocchiR., LimidoA.Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy.Nephrol Dial Transplant2007; 22: 3601–5.
5.
KutnerN., BowlesT., ZhangR., HuangY., PastanS.Dialysis facility characteristics and variation in employment rates: a national study.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2008; 3: 111–16.
6.
MendelssohnD.C., MullaneyS.R., JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L.What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection.Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 22–9.
7.
JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 263–8.
8.
JassalS.V., KrishnaG., MallickN.P., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study.Nephrol Dial Transplant2002; 17: 474–7.
9.
CharestA.F., MendelssohnD.C.Are North American nephrologists biased against peritoneal dialysis?Per it Dial Int2001; 21: 335–7.
LameireN., Van BiesenW., DombrosN., DratwaM., FallerB., GahlG.M.The referral pattern of patients with ESRD is a determinant in the choice of dialysis modality.Perit Dial Int1997; 17(Suppl 2): S161–6.
12.
GomezC.G., ValidoP., CeladillaO., Bernaldo de QuirosA.G., MojonM.Validity of a standard information protocol provided to end-stage renal disease patients and its effect on treatment selection.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 471–7.
13.
LittleJ., IrwinA., MarshallT., RaynerH., SmithS.Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department.Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 981–6.
14.
JagerK.J., KorevaarJ.C., DekkerF.W., KredietR.T., BoeschotenE.W.; Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands.Am J Kidney Dis2004; 43: 891–9.
15.
AhlmenJ., CarlssonL., SchonborgC.Well-informed patients with end-stage renal disease prefer peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis.Perit Dial Int1993; 13(Suppl 2): S196–8.
16.
LevinA., LewisM., MortiboyP., FaberS., HareI., PorterE.C.Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings.Am J Kidney Dis1997; 29: 533–40.
17.
KorevaarJ.C., JansenM.A.M., MerkusM.P., DekkerF.W., BoeschotenE.W., KredietR.T.Quality of life in predialysis end-stage renal disease patients at the initiation of dialysis therapy. The NECOSAD Study Group.Perit Dial Int2000; 20: 69–75.
18.
MehrotraR., KermahD., FriedL., Kalantar-ZadehK., KhawarO., NorrisK.Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States: declining utilization despite improving outcomes.J Am Soc Nephrol2007; 18: 2781–8.
19.
NKF-K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy: update 2006.Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48(Suppl 1): S99–102.
20.
OliverM.J., QuinnR.R., RichardsonE.P., KissA.J., LampingD.L., MannsB.J.Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis.Kidney Int2007; 71: 673–8.
21.
LobbedezT., MoldovanR., LecameM., Hurault de LignyB., El HagganW., RyckelynckJ.P.Assisted peritoneal dialysis. Experience in a French renal department.Perit Dial Int2006; 26: 671–6.
22.
HörlW.H., de AlvaroF., WilliamsP.F.Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies—an international review: access to ESRD treatments.Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14(Suppl 6): 10–5.
23.
FreiU., Schober-HalstenbergH.J.QuaSi-Niere: Renal Replacement Therapy in Germany. Report on Dialysis Treatment and Renal Transplantation in Germany 2003/2004. [Available at: www.quasi-niere.de]
24.
MendelssohnD.C., LangloisN., BlakeP.G.Peritoneal dialysis in Ontario: a natural experiment in physician reimbursement methodology.Perit Dial Int2004; 24: 531–7.
25.
MehrotraR., MarshD., VoneshE., PetersV., NissensonA.Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis.Kidney Int2005; 68: 378–90.