MendelssohnD.C.Reflections on the optimal dialysis modality distribution: a North American perspective.Nephrol News Issues2002; 16(4): 26–30.
2.
JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 263–8.
3.
MendelssohnD.C., MullaneyS.R., JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L.What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection?Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 22–9.
4.
JassalS.V., KrishnaG., MallickN.P., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study.Nephrol Dial Transplant2002; 17: 474–7.
5.
MendelssohnD.C., PierratosA.Reformulating the integrated care concept for the new millennium.Perit Dial Int2002; 22: 5–8.
6.
MendelssohnD.C.Empowerment of patient preference in dialysis modality selection.Am J Kidney Dis2004; 43: 930–2.
7.
OreopoulosD.G., ColemanS., DoyleE.Reversing the decreasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) trend in Ontario: a government initiative to increase PD use in Ontario to 30% by 2010.Perit Dial Int2007; 27: 489–95.
8.
JindalK.Revitalizing peritoneal dialysis: the Ontario approach.Perit Dial Int2007; 27: 526–8.
9.
LobbedezT., MoldovanR., LecameM., Hurault de LignyB., El HagganW., RyckelynckJ.P.Assisted peritoneal dialysis. Experience in a French renal department.Perit Dial Int2006; 26: 671–6.
10.
OliverM.J., QuinnR.R., RichardsonE.P., KissA.J., LampingD.L., MannsB.J.Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis.Kidney Int2007; 71: 673–8.
11.
MendelssohnD.C.A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis.Kidney Int2007; 71: 602–4.
12.
Provincial Peritoneal Dialysis Coordinating Committee.Provincial peritoneal dialysis joint initiative: strategy on increasing peritoneal dialysis in Ontario.2006.
13.
MendelssohnD.C., LangloisN., BlakeP.G.Peritoneal dialysis in Ontario: a natural experiment in physician reimbursement methodology.Perit Dial Int2004; 24: 531–7.