II.NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37(Suppl 1):S65–136.
2.
DombrosNDratwaMFerianiMGokalRHeimbürgerOKredietR. European best practice guidelines for peri-toneal dialysis. 7. Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant2005; 20(Suppl 9):ix24–7.
3.
PaniaguaRAmatoDVoneshECorrea–RotterRRamosAMoranJ. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13:1307–20.
4.
LoWKHoYWLiCSWongKSChanTMYuAW. Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomized prospective study. Kidney Int2003; 64:649–56.
5.
LoWKLuiSLChanTMLiFKLamMFTseKC. Minimal and optimal peritoneal Kt/V targets: results of an anuric peritoneal dialysis patient's survival analysis. Kidney Int2005; 67:2032–8.
6.
Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy Work Group.Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48(Suppl 1):S131–58.
GotchFALippsBJKeenMLPanlilioF.Computerized urea kinetic modeling to prescribe and monitor delivered Kt/V (pKt/V, dKt/V) in peritoneal dialysis. Fresenius randomized dialysis prescriptions and clinical outcome study (RDP/CO). Adv Perit Dial1996; 12:43–5.
10.
BuschSSchreiberMBodnarDBuchlerNFuchsJJackson–BeyD. The 24-hour D/P ratio is a convenient screen for identifying altered peritoneal transport rates. Adv Perit Dial1993; 9:119–23.
11.
RippeBStelinGHaraldssonB.Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. Kidney Int1991; 40: 315–25.
12.
Van BiesenWVan der TolAVeysNDequidtCVijtDLameireN. The personal dialysis capacity test is superior to the peritoneal equilibration test to discriminate inflammation as the cause of fast transport status in peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2006; 1:269–74.
13.
RoccoMVJordanJRBurkartJM. Determination of peritoneal transport characteristics with 24-hour dialysate collections: dialysis adequacy and transport test. J Am Soc Nephrol1994; 5:1333–8.
14.
VergerCLarpentLVeniezGCorvaisierB.Monitoring of peritoneal permeability in peritoneal dialysis [French]. Rev Prat1991; 41:1086–90.
15.
SmitWLangedijkMJSchoutenNvan den BergNStruijkDGKredietRT. A comparison between 1.36% and 3.86% glucose dialysis solution for the assessment of peritoneal membrane function. Perit Dial Int2000; 20:734–41.
16.
JohnsonDWMudgeDWBlizzardSArndtMO'SheaAWattR. A comparison of peritoneal equilibration tests performed 1 and 4 weeks after PD commencement. Perit Dial Int2004; 24:460–5.
