LameireN., Van BiesenW., Van LandschootM., WangT., HeimburgerO., BergstromJ.Experimental models in peritoneal dialysis: a European experience.Kidney Int1998; 54: 2194–206.
2.
TopleyN.Animal models in peritoneal dialysis: more questions than answers?Perit Dial Int2005; 25: 33–4.
3.
ter WeeP.M., BeelenR.H., van den BornJ.The application of animal models to study the biocompatibility of bicarbonate-buffered peritoneal dialysis solutions.Kidney Int Suppl2003; 88: S75–83.
4.
MortierS., LameireN.H., de VrieseA.S.Animal models in peritoneal dialysis research: a need for consensus.Perit Dial Int2005; 25: 16–24.
5.
CombetS., FerrierM.L., Van LandschootM., StoenoiuM., MoulinP., MiyataT.Chronic uremia induces permeability changes, increased nitric oxide synthase expression, and structural modifications in the peritoneum.J Am Soc Nephrol2001; 12: 2146–57.
6.
GotloibL., CrasswellerP., RodellaH., OreopoulosD.G., ZellermanG., OgilvieR.Experimental model for studies of continuous peritoneal dialysis in uremic rabbits.Nephron1982; 31: 254–9.
7.
de WaartD.R., ZweersM.M., StruijkD.G., KredietR.T.Icodextrin degradation products in spent dialysate of CAPD patients and the rat, and its relation with dialysate osmolality.Perit Dial Int2001; 21: 269–74.
8.
CrispM.S., ChewD.J., DiBartolaS.P., BirchardS.J.Peritoneal dialysis in dogs and cats: 27 cases (1976-1987).J Am Vet Med Assoc1989; 195: 1262–6.
9.
UechiM., IidaE., WatanabeT., KuwajimaS., NakayamaT., KanoY.Peritoneal dialysis using a recycling system in dogs.J Vet Med Sci1993; 55: 723–7.
10.
BarrelG.K., McFarlaneR.G., SlowS., VasudevamurthyM.K., McGregorD.O.CAPD in sheep following bilateral nephrectomy.Perit Dial Int2006; 26: 598.
11.
LittnerY., MimouniF.B., DollbergS., MandelD.Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med2005; 159: 1036–7.
12.
PaniaguaR., AmatoD., VoneshE., Correa-RotterR., RamosA., MoranJ.Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13: 1307–20.
13.
HensleyS., AbboudL.Medical research has ‘black hole’: negative results often fail to get published in journals; some blame drug industry.Wall Street Journal (East Ed)B3, June 4, 2004.
14.
HojatM., GonnellaJ.S., CaelleighA.S.Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2003; 8: 75–96.
