NissensonA.R.Restructuring the ESRD payment system in the United States.Kidney Int2004; 66: 466–76.
2.
ESRD Clinical Performance Measures Project, 2003 Annual Report.Bethesda, MD: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2003.
3.
Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate.Dialysis facilities: problems remain in ensuring compliance with Medicare quality standards.Washington, D.C.: United States General Accounting Office; October, 2003: GAO-04-63.
ShekelleP.New contract for general practitioners.BMJ2003; 326: 457–8.
6.
RoncoC., MarcelliD.Opinions regarding outcome differences in the European and US haemodialysis patients.Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14: 2616–20.
7.
PlantingaL.C., FinkN.E., SadlerJ.H., LeveyA.S., LevinN.W., RubinH.R.Frequency of patient-physician contact and patient outcomes in hemodialysis care.J Am Soc Nephrol2004; 15: 238–9.
8.
RubinH.R., FinkN.E., PlantingaL.C., SadlerJ.H., KligerA.S., PoweN.R.Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis.JAMA2004; 291: 697–703.
9.
NissensonA.R., PrichardS., ChengI., GokalR., KubotaM., MaiorcaR.ESRD modality selection into the 21st century: the importance of non medical factors.ASAIO J1997; 43: 143–50.
10.
United States Renal Data System.USRDS 2003 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2003.
11.
MendelssohnD.C., MullaneyS.R., JangB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L.What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection?Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 22–9.
12.
TroidleL.K., KligerA.S., FinkelsteinF.O.Factors influencing CPD utilization in Network #1, New England [Abstract].J Am Soc Nephrol2004 [in press].
