MitchW., McClellanW.M.Patterns of patient care reported by nephrologists: Implications for nephrology training.Am J Kidney Dis1998; 32: 551–6.
2.
KimmelP.L., BoschJ.P.Effectiveness of renal fellowship training for subsequent clinical practice.Am J Kidney Dis1991; 18: 249–56.
3.
SukhatmeV.P.Training the academic nephrologist for the new millennium.Semin Nephrol2000; 20: 87–91.
4.
PeitzmanS.J.Nephrology in the United States from Osler to the artificial kidney.Ann Intern Med1986; 105: 937–46.
5.
MehrotraR., BlakeP., BermanN., NolphK.D.An analysis of dialysis training in the United States and Canada.Am J Kidney Dis2002; 40: 152–60.
6.
PereiraB.J.Optimization of pre-ESRD care: The key to improved dialysis outcomes.Kidney Int2000; 57: 351–65.
7.
Diaz-BuxoJ.A.The importance of pre-ESRD education and early nephrological care in peritoneal dialysis selection and outcome.Perit Dial Int1998; 18: 363–5.
8.
MendelssohnD.C., MullaneyS.R., JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L.What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection?Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 22–9.
9.
JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 263–8.
10.
OreopoulosD.G., BlakeP.Declining utilization of peritoneal dialysis: Time to stop imposing our biases on the patients and let them be dialyzed with the modality of their choice.ASAIO J2001; 47: 312–15.
11.
PeitzmanS.J.Chronic dialysis and dialysis doctors in the United States: A nephrologist-historian's perspective.Semin Dial2001; 14: 200–8.
12.
BlakeP.G., BreborowiczA., HanD.S., JoffeP., KorbetS.M., WaradyB.A.Recommended peritoneal dialysis curriculum for nephrology trainees. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) Standards and Education Subcommittee.Perit Dial Int2000; 20: 497–502.
