Abstract
Objective
Design
Secondary analysis of a previously reported survey.
Participants
All practicing Canadian nephrologists (
Intervention
Self-administered mailed questionnaire.
Main Outcome Measures
Opinions and attitudes of nephrologists concerning patient characteristics favoring one dialysis modality over the other, as well as the relative utilization of HD and PD currently and in a hypothetical ideal situation.
Results
The main differences were present between physicians practicing mainly HD and physicians practicing mainly PD, with those practicing both giving answers usually intermediate to the others. The maximum weight suitable for PD was 10 kg less according to HD-oriented nephrologists compared with PD-oriented nephrologists (97.8 kg vs 108.5 kg). All nephrologists agreed that, ideally, 40% of prevalent end-stage renal disease patients should be on PD to optimize cost-effectiveness, whereas the proportion should be between 32% and 45% when one optimizes survival, wellness, and quality of life. In general, differences between groups were small.
Conclusions
Most nephrologists favored a proportion of PD higher than the current prevalence seen in either Canada or the U.S.A. If physicians’ biases are contributing to the distribution of dialysis modalities, they are not likely to be major factors. Unknown but important factors, external to the physician, may shape modality distribution more than the opinions and attitudes of physicians. If a more balanced and cost-effective dialysis delivery system is desired, more understanding and manipulation of these non physician-related factors will be required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.