United States Renal Data System.Treatment modalities. In: USRDS 2000 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000: 69–76.
2.
Canadian Organ Replacement Register.Volume 1: Dialysis and renal transplantation. In: 2000 annual report.Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Health Information, 2000; Section 1: 1–28 and Section 2: 1–28.
3.
BlakeP.G., BloembergenW.E., FentonS.S.Changes in the demographics and prescription of peritoneal dialysis during the last decade.Am J Kidney Dis1998; 32(Suppl 4): S44–51.
4.
United States Renal Data System.Incidence and prevalence of ESRD. In: USRDS 2000 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000: 37–40.
5.
United States Renal Data System.International comparisons. In: USRDS 1999 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1999: 173–84.
6.
United States Renal Data System.International comparisons. In: USRDS 2000 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000: 177–82.
7.
The UK Renal Registry.The second annual report.Bristol: United Kingdom Renal Registry, 1999.
8.
ANZDATA Registry report 1999.Adelaide, South Australia: Australia New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, 1999.
9.
Nissenson AR, Prichard SS, Cheng IK, Gokal R, Kubota M, Maiorca R, et al.Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection.Kidney Int1993; 40: S120–7.
10.
United States Renal Data System.Economic costs of ESRD. USRDS 2000 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000: 163–6.
11.
BrunsF.J., SeedonP., SaulM., ZeidelM.L.The cost of caring for end-stage kidney disease patients: an analysis based on hospital financial transaction records.J Am Soc Nephrol1998; 9: 884–90.
12.
BlakeP.G.Factors affecting international utilization of peritoneal dialysis; implications for increasing utilization in the United States.Semin Dial1999; 12: 365–9.
13.
MendelssohnD.C., CheryA.Dialysis utilization in the Toronto region from 1981 to 1992.Can Med Assoc J1994; 150: 1099–105.
14.
MendelssohnD.C., BlakeP.G.Shifting sand: dialysis funding and modality distribution in Ontario.Nephrol News Issues1999; 13(3): 31–32, 37.
15.
GoereeR., ManalichJ., GrootendorstP., BeecroftM.L., ChurchillD.N.Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Clin Invest Med1995; 18: 455–64.
16.
BloembergenW.E., PortF.K., MaugerE.A., WolfeR.A.A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol1995; 6: 177–83.
17.
Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes.J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 198–207.
18.
FentonS.S., SchaubelD.E., DesmeulesM., MorrisonH.I., MaoY., CoplestonP.Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates.Am J Kidney Dis1997; 30: 334–42.
19.
HeldP.J., PortF.K., TurenneM.N., GaylinD.S., HamburgerR.J., WolfeR.A.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions.Kidney Int1994; 45: 1163–9.
20.
CollinA.J., HoW., XiaH., EbbenJ.P., EversonS.E., ConstantiniE.G.Mortality risk of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.Am J Kidney Dis1999; 34: 1065–74.
21.
BlakeP.G., MendelssohnD.C.Changes in hemodialysis delivery in Ontario 1995–2000.Nephrol News Issues2000; 14(11): 72–83.
22.
United States Renal Data System.Provider characteristics. In: USRDS 2000 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000: 149–62.
23.
HeldP.J., BloembergenW.E., YoungE.W., WoodsJ.D., OrzolS., WolfeR.A.A comparison of patients initiating hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the US (Abstract).J Am Soc Nephrol1997; 8: 219A.
24.
LeveyA.S., MeyerK.B., AthienitesN.V., MartinA.A., FinkN.E., KlagM.J.Comparison of comorbidity in incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: an interim report from the Choice Study (Abstract).J Am Soc Nephrol1997; 8: 220A.
25.
MurphyS.W., FoleyR.N., BarrettB.J., KentG.M., MorganJ., BarreP.E.Comparative hospitalization of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada.Kidney Int2000; 57: 2557–63.
26.
United States Renal Data System.The USRDS Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study: Wave 2. In: USRDS 1997 annual data report.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1997: 49–68.
27.
JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L., MendelssohnD.C.Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 263–8.
28.
MendelssohnD.C., MullaneyS., JungB., BlakeP.G., MehtaR.L.What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection?Am J Kidney Dis2001; 37: 27–9.
29.
ThamerM., HwangW., FinkN.E., SadlerJ.H., BassE.B., LeveyA.S.US nephrologists’ recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey.Am J Kidney Dis2000; 36: 1155–65.
30.
AmairP., KhannaR., LeibelP., PierratosA., VasS., MeemaE.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in diabetics with end-stage renal disease.N Engl J Med1982; 306: 625–30.
31.
BurtonP.R., WallsJ.Selection-adjusted comparison of life expectancy of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis, and renal transplantation.Lancet1987; 16: 1115–19.
32.
WolcottD.L., NissensonA.R.Quality of life in chronic dialysis patients: a critical comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis.Am J Kidney Dis1988; 11: 405–12.
33.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., BrownJ.M., SiglerM.H., RaimondoJ.Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome of CAPD. A five year longitudinal study.Adv Perit Dial1990; 6: 181–5.
34.
Van BiesenW., VanholderR.C., VeysN., DhondtA., LameireN.H.An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients.J Am Soc Nephrol2000; 11: 116–25.
35.
BlakeP.G., BreborowiczA., HanD.S., JoffeP., KorbetS.M., WaradyB.A.International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD). Recommended peritoneal dialysis curriculum for nephrology trainees.Perit Dial Int2000; 20: 497–502.
WuerthD.B., FinkelsteinS.H., KligerA.S., FinkelsteinF.O.Patient assessment of quality of care in a chronic peritoneal dialysis facility.Am J Kidney Dis2000; 35: 638–43.