National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative.Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy.Am J Kidney Dis1997; 30(Suppl 2): S67–136.
2.
ChatothD.K., GolperT.A., GokalR.In-depth review; morbidity and mortality in defining adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: A step beyond NKF-DOQI.Am J Kidney Dis1999; 33: 617–32.
3.
Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: FieldM.U., LohrK.N., eds. Clinical practice guidelines: Directions for a new program.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
4.
American Medical Association/Specialty Society Practice Parameters Partnership Attributes to Guide the Development and Evaluation of Practice Parameters/Guidelines.1996.
5.
GolperT.A.Implementation of the peritoneal dialysis adequacy guidelines: A personal perspective.Adv Ren Replace Ther1999; 6(1): 7–13.
6.
EknoyanG., LevinN.W., SteinbergE.The National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI).Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens1997; 6: 520–3.
RoccoM., FlaniganM., ProwantB., BailieG., FrankenfeldD., FrederickP.1996 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study (PD-CIS): Cycler prescription and adequacy data [Abstract].J Am Soc Nephrol1997; 8: 290A.
9.
GokalR., HartyJ.Are there limits for CAPD? Adequacy and nutritional considerations.Perit Dial Int1996; 16: 437–41.
10.
LoW.K., ChengI.K.P., LuiS.L., ChanT.M., LiF.K., LaiK.N.Is the target Kt/V and patient survival different between Asian and Western continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients?Perit Dial Int1999; 19(Suppl 2): S27–31.
11.
BlakeP.G., BargmanJ.M., BickD., CartierP., DasguptaM.K., FineA.Guidelines for adequacy and nutrition in peritoneal dialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol1999; 10(Suppl 13): S311–17.
12.
The Renal Association and Royal College of Physicians of London.Treatment of adult patients with renal failure—Recommended standards and audit measures.London: Royal College of Physicians; 1997.
13.
TeehanB.P., SchleiferC.R., BrownJ.Urea kinetic modeling is an appropriate assessment of adequacy.Semin Dial1992; 5: 189–92.
14.
LameireN.H., VanholderR., VeytD., LambertM., RinoirS.A longitudinal, 5 year survey of urea kinetic parameters in CAPD patients.Kidney Int1992; 47: 426–32.
15.
MaiorcaR., CancariniGC., OutcomeinP.D.: Comparative studies. In: GokalR., NolphK.D., eds. The textbook of peritoneal dialysis.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994: 699–734.
16.
GenestierS., HedelinG., SchafferP., FallerB.Prognostic factors in CAPD patients: A retrospective study over a ten year period.Nephrol Dial Transplant1995; 10: 1905–11.
17.
ChurchillD.N., TaylorD.W., KeshaviahP.R., and the CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes.J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 198–207.
18.
De AlvaroF., BajoM.A., Alvarez–UdeF., VigilA., MolinaA., CoronelF.Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: Does Kt/V have the same predictive value as in HD? A multicenter study. In: KhannaR., NolphK.D., ProwantB.F., TwardowskiZ.J., OreopoulosD.G., eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis.Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1992; 8: 93–7.
19.
BlakeP., BurkartJ., ChurchillD., DaugirdasJ., DepnerT., HamburgerR.J.Recommended clinical practices for maximizing total solute clearances.Perit Dial Int1996; 16: 448–56.
20.
ChurchillD.N., ThorpeK.E., VoneshE.F., KeshaviahP.K.Lower probability of patient survival with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in the United States compared with Canada.J Am Soc Nephrol1997; 8: 965–71.
21.
SzetoC.C., LaiK.N., YuA.W.Y., LeungC.B., HoK.K.L., MakT.W.L.Dialysis adequacy of Asian patients receiving small volume continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Int J Artif Organs1997; 20: 428–35.
22.
LoW.K., ChengI.K.P., TongK.L., LiC.S., ChanT.M., HoY.W.Impact of nutritional status and adequacy of dialysis on CAPD patient survival [Abstract].Perit Dial Int1999; 19(Suppl 1): S21.
23.
LoW.K., JiangY., ChengS.W., ChengI.K.P.Survival of CAPD patients in a center using three 2L exchanges as a standard regime.Perit Dial Int1996; 16(Suppl 1): S163–6.
LoW.K., ChengI.K.P., LuiS.L., ChanT.M., LiF.K., LaiK.N.Is target Kt/V and patient survival different between Asian and Western CAPD patients?Perit Dial Int1999; 19(Suppl 2): S27–31.
26.
HartyJ., BoultonH., HeelisN., UttleyL., VenningM., GokalR.Limitations of kinetic models as predictors of nutritional and dialysis adequacy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.Am J Nephrol1993; 13: 454–63.
27.
CollinsA.J., MaJ.Z., UmenA., KeshaviahP.Urea index and other predictors of hemodialysis patient survival.Am J Kidney Dis1994; 23: 272–82.
28.
GotchF.A.Relationships between creatinine clearance and Kt/V in peritoneal dialysis: A defense of the DOQI document.Perit Dial Int1999; 19: 107–11.
KeshaviahP.K.Urea kinetic and middle molecule approach to assessing adequacy of hemodialysis and CAPD.Kidney Int1993; 43(Suppl 40): S28–38.
31.
AnderstamB., MamounA.H., SoderstenP., BergströmJ.Middle-sized molecule fractions isolated from uremic ultrafiltrate and normal urine inhibit ingestive behavior in the rat.J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 2453–60.
32.
BurkartJ.M., SchreiberM., KorbetS.M., ChurchillD.N., HamburgerR.J., MoranJ.Solute clearance approach to adequacy of peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int1996; 16: 457–70.