Current Developments in Posterior Composite Resins

Abstract

The use of posterior composite resins has grown at a rapid rate. While the original materials were completely inadequate for the restoration of Class I and II cavity preparations, the newer-generation materials are apparently superior. While wear rates of over 100 μm per year were not uncommon, some of the newer composites wear away at the rate of less than 1 μm per month.

A great deal of the improvement in wear resistance can be attributed to an optimization of the filler particle. Specifically, the particle size has been decreased and the filler loading has been increased. In some instances, softer filler particles have been incorporated in order to decrease the hardness differential between the filler and the resin matrix. Other factors which have been considered include chemical erosion of the matrix, degradation of the silane coupling agent, internal porosity, method of polymerization, and hydrophobicity of the resin matrix.

A greater understanding has been developed regarding patterns of wear as well as rates of wear. Techniques have been developed for rapid and routine measurements of the loss of anatomical form. Although the composite resins have been improved substantially, their use in posterior teeth is quite technique-sensitive. Furthermore, the problem of secondary caries is still a major concern.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abell, A.K. ; Leinfelder, K.F. ; and Turner, D.T. (1983): Microscopic Observations of the Wear of a Tooth Restorative Composite in vivo, J Biomed Mater Res 17:501-507.

Ameye, C.M. ; Roulet, J.F. ; and Lutz, F. (1984): P-10, Acceptable as a Posterior Composite?, J Dent Res 63: 199, Abst. No. 254.

Bowen, R.L. (1962): Dental Filling Material Comprising Vinyl Silane Treated Fused Silica and a Binder Consisting of a Reaction Product of Bisphenol and Glycidyl Methacrylate, U.S. Patent No. 3, 066, 112.

Buonocore, M.G. (1955): A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces, J Dent Res 34 : 849-853.

Cvar, J.F. and Ryge, G. (1971): Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials: U.S. Dental Health Center, San Francisco , U.S. Government Printing Office, Publ. No. 7902244.

Eames, W.B. ; Strain, J.D. ; Weitman, R.T. ; and Williams, A.K. (1974): Clinical Comparison of Composite, Amalgam, and Silicate Restorations, J Am Dent Assoc 89: 1111-1117.

Goldberg, A.J. ; Rydinge, E. ; Lambert, K. ; Sanchez, L. ; and Santucci, E.A. (1981): Clinical Evaluation Methods for Posterior Composite Restorations, J Dent Res 60: 582-589.

Kusy, R.P. and Leinfelder, K.F. (1977): Pattern of Wear in Posterior Composite Resins, J Dent Res 56: 544.

Lambrechts, P. ; Vuylsteke, M. ; Vanherle, G. ; and Da-Vidson, C.L. (1984): Quantitative Evaluation of the Wear Resistance of Posterior Dental Restorations. A New Three-dimensional Measuring Technique , J Dent 12: 252-267.

10.

Leinfelder, K.F. ; Sluder, T.B. ; Sockwell, C.L. ; Strick-Land, W.D. ; and Wall, J.T. (1975): Clinical Evaluation of Composite Resins as Anterior and Posterior Restorative Materials, J Prosthet Dent 33: 407-416.

11.

Leinfelder, K.F. ; Sluder, T.B. ; Santos, J.F.F. ; and Wall, J.T. (1980): Five-Year Clinical Evaluation of Anterior and Posterior Restorations of Composite Resin, Oper Dent 5: 57-65.

12.

Leinfelder, K.F. ; Taylor, D.F. ; Barkmeier, W.W. ; and Goldberg, A.J. (1986): Quantitative Wear Measurement of Posterior Resins , Dent Mater 2: 198-201.

13.

Lugassy, A.A. and Moffa, J.P. (1985): Laboratory Model for the Quantification of Clinical Occlusal Wear, J Dent Res 64: 181, Abst. No. 63.

14.

McComb, D. (1985): Evaluation of Clinical Wear of Posterior Composite Resins. In: Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials , G. Vanherle and D.C. Smith , Eds., International Symposium, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publ. Co., pp. 511-517.

15.

Mitchem, J. and Gronas, D.G. (1982): In vivo Evaluation of the Wear of Restorative Resins, J Am Dent Assoc 104: 333-339.

16.

Mitchem, J. and Gronas, D.G. (1984): The Continued in vivo Evaluation of the Wear of Restorative Resins, J Dent Res 63: 337, Abst. No. 1498.

17.

Osborne, J.W. ; Gale, E.N. ; and Ferguson, G.W. (1973): One-Year and Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Composite Resin vs. Amalgam, J Prosthet Dent 30: 795-800.

18.

Phillips, R.W. ; Avery, D.R. ; Mehra, R. ; Swartz, M.L. ; and McCune, R.J. (1971): Observations on a Composite Resin for Class II Restorations, J Prosthet Dent 26: 68-77.

19.

Phillips, R.W. ; Avery, D.R. ; Mehra, R. ; Swartz, M.L. ; and McCune, R.J. (1972): Observations on a Composite Resin for Class II Restorations: Two-Year Report, J Prosthet Dent 28: 164-169.

20.

Phillips, R.W. ; Avery, D.R. ; Mehra, R. ; Swartz, M.L. ; and McCune, R.J. (1973): Observations on a Composite Resin for Class II Restorations: Three-Year Report, J Prosthet Dent 30: 891-898.

21.

Ratanapridakul, K. ; Leinfelder, K.F. ; and Thomas, J.P. (1987): Effect of Finishing on the Wear Rate of Posterior Composite Resins, J Dent Res 66: 182, Abst. No. 606.

22.

Taylor, D.R. ; Turnbull, C.D. ; and Leinfelder, K.F. (1984): Comparative Evaluation of Casts for the Measurement of Composite Wear, J Dent Res 63: Abst. No. 1104.

23.

Wisniewski, J.W. ; McCartha, C.D. ; Leinfelder, K.F. ; and Isenberg, B.P. (1988): Two-Year Clinical Investigation of Fine Particle Posterior Composite Resin, J Dent Res 67: 120, Abst. No. 62.