Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article asks whether centralized goal formation of the sort involved in Goals 2000 or in the development of state curriculum standards is consistent with pluralism reasonably conceived. It argues that an educational system that is consistent with pluralism reasonably conceived must (a) provide or allow every culture fair and adequate time and resources for the reproduction of its distinctive or distinguishing values; (b) provide adequate time and resources for the reproduction of the society's public values, especially citizenship; and (c) provide adequate time and resources for members of different cultures to learn from and about one another It concludes that curriculum encompassing standards and accountability mechanisms that make schools fully accountable to the state are inconsistent with pluralism and argues for flexible standards and accountability that are more narrowly focused on the state's central interests in education, but that permit significant local variation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

A new compact for learning. (1994). Albany: University of the State of New York, State Education Department.

Arons, S. (1994). The threat to freedom in Goals 2000. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education (pp. 55-60). New York: College Board.

Baer, R. A., Jr. (1993). "Strict neutrality" and our monopoly system. In J. W. Skillen (Ed.), The school choice controversy (pp. 15-34). Washington, DC: Baker Books.

Banks, J. A. (1993). The cannon debate, knowledge construction, and multiculturalism. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4-14.

Bennett, W. J. (1984). To reclaim a legacy: A report on the humanities in higher education. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Humanities.

Bishop, J. (1989). Why the apathy in American high schools? Educational Researcher, 18,6-10, 42.

Callan, E. (1996). Political liberalism and political education. Review of Politics, 58(1), 1-33.

Excellence, Commissioner's Task Force on Minorities: Equity and Excellence. (1989). A curriculum of inclusion. Albany, NY

Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy (pp. 1-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Fullinwider, R. (Ed.). (1996). Public education in a multicultural society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Galston, W. (1995). Two concepts of liberalism. Ethics, 105(3), 516-534.

12.

Goals 2000: Educate America Act, Pub. L. No. 103-227 (1994).

13.

Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

15.

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every literate Amen can needs to know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

16.

Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

17.

Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon.

18.

Learning standards for social studies. (1966). Albany: University of the State of New York, State Education Department.

19.

Lee v. Weissman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992).

20.

Mill, J. S. (1956). On liberty. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1859)

21.

O'Day, J. A. , & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

24.

Schlesinger, A.M.J. (1992). The disuniting of America. New York: Norton.

25.

Shanker, A. (1994). National standards. In C. E. Finn, Jr. , & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Radical education reform (pp. 3-20). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

26.

Steinberg, L. (1966). Beyond the classroom. New York: Simon & Schuster.

27.

Strike, K. A. (1991). The moral role of education in a liberal democratic society. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 17, pp. 413-483). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

28.

Strike, K. A. (1994). On the construction of public speech: Pluralism and public reason. Educational Theory, 44(1), 1-25.

29.

Strike, K. A. (1995). Discourse ethics and restructuring. In M. Katz (Ed.), Philosophy of education, 1994 (pp. 1-14). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

30.

Strike, K. A. (1996). Must liberal citizens be reasonable. Review of Politics, 58(1), 41-48.

31.

Strike, K. A. (1997). A centralized goal formation and systemic reform: Reflections on liberty, localism and pluralism. Educational Policy Analysis, 5(11). Available: http://olam.ed.asu.edulepaa/v5nll.html

32.

Westside v. Mergans, 493 U.S. 182 (1990).

33.

Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

Centralized Goal Formation,Citizenship,and Educational Pluralism: Accountability in Liberal Democratic Societies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References