Abstract
This article reports on the politics of accountability in one state's school-to-career initiative. School-to-career systems are defined to include educational and work-related curricula and vocational guidance for all students. Historical contexts of school-to-career initiatives are presented. Perspectives of the federal government, state agencies, local partnerships, and a university evaluation team on what it means to implement school-to-career programs are discussed and differences explored. The article considers influences on program design, outcomes, and systems change efforts. This discussion focuses on three areas: (a) the politics of implementation-dilemmas faced in balancing constituent interests, (b) the politics of representation-how representation on a state management team affects partnership efforts, and (c) the politics of evaluation-ways in which accountability and standards reflect beliefs and alter practices in education settings. The article concludes with considerations and recommendations for policy makers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
