Can the Odds Be Changed?

Abstract

There are plenty of examples of small, self-governing schools of choice that successfully serve high-risk students in both the public and the private sector If we pose the problem differently, their examples can offer systemic solutions. To do so we need to rethink how public institutions are held accountable. We need, for example, to rely on instruments of accountability that are consistent with our ends: increasing the intelligent and responsible behavior of the people closest to (and including) the learners. In New York City, an experiment in developing such a systemic alternative is currently under way with support from the Annenberg Foundation. Unless we find a way to match what we know works on a small scale with what we do on a large scale, we are likely to end up concluding that public education itself is the culprit.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ancess, J. & Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). The development of authentic assessment of Central Park East Secondary School. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teacher's College, Columbia University.

Bensman, D. (1987). Quality education in the inner city: The story of Central Park East schools. New York: New York Center for Collaborative Education.

Bensman, D. (1994). Lives of the graduates of CPE elementary school. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teacher's College, Columbia University.

Bensman, D. (1995). Learning to think well: CPESS graduates reflect on their high school and college experience. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teacher's College, Columbia University.

Bryk, A. , Holland, P. , & Lee, V. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chubb, J. E. , & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Ancess, J. (1995). Inching toward systemic change in New York City. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teacher's College, Columbia University.

Fine, M. (1984). Chartering urban school reform: On public high schools in the midst of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fliegel, S. (1993). Miracle in East Harlem. New York: Random House.

10.

Gandini, L. , Forman, G. , & Edwards, C. (Eds.). (1996). The hundred languages of children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

11.

Hargreaves, A. , Earl, L. , & Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents (chap. 10). Washington, DC: Falmer.

12.

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Miffin.

13.

MacMullen, P. (1996). Taking stock: The impact of reform-a research collection and analysis. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.

14.

Meier, D. W. (1995). The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon.

15.

Nathan, J. (Ed.). (1988). Public schools by choice: Expanding opportunities for parents, students and teachers. St. Paul, MN: Institute for Learning and Teaching.

16.

Newman, F. , & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful schools restructuring. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.

17.

Raywid, M. A. (1996, April). Taking stock: The movement to create mini schools, schools within schools and separate small schools. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education and the Institute for Urban and Minority Education.

18.

Sizer, T. (1993). Horace's Compromise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.