This case study of one community's task force on corporal punishment illustrates the impediments to the application of education research in local policy making. Because the nature and methods of empirical research are not well understood, even by local education professionals, scientific knowledge can be mischaracterized or ignored, especially when it clashes with strongly held personal beliefs. For scholarship to serve society, scholars must identify and confront the impediments to accurate understanding of scientific knowledge and take greater care in preparing their students, the future educational leaders in local communities, to understand and make use of education research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A Good Spank
? (1994, June 27). Newsweek, 8.
2.
Anyon, J.
(1995). Race, social class, and educational reform in an inner-city school. Teachers College Record, 97, 69-94.
3.
Bauer, G.
, Dubanoski, R., Yamauchi, L., & Honbo, K. (1990). Corporal punishment and the schools. Education and Urban Society, 22, 285-299.
4.
Benham, M.K.P.
, & Heck, R. H. (1994). Political culture and policy in a state-controlled educational system: The case of educational politics in Hawaii. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 419-450.
5.
Berliner, D. C.
(1990). Research on teaching and educational policy. In L. R. Marcus & B. D. Stickney (Eds.), Politics and policy in the age of education (pp. 263-287). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
Bjork, L. G.
(1995). Substance and symbolism in the education commission reports. In R. Ginsberg & D. Plank (Eds.), Commissions, reports, reforms, and educational policy (pp. 133-149). Westport, CT: Praeger.
7.
Bogdan, R.
, & Taylor S. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Bryan, J.
, & Freed, F. (1982). Corporal punishment: Normative data and sociological and psychological correlates in a community college population. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 77-87.
9.
Cole, G.
(1995). The American system of criminal justice (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10.
Deal, T. E.
(1995). Summits, task forces, and commissions as ceremonial dance. In R. Ginsberg & D. Plank (Eds.), Commissions, reports, reform, and educational policy (pp. 125-132). Westport, CT: Praeger.
11.
District Gives 1,326 Paddlings in '92-93
. (1994, May 11). Akron Beacon Journal, p. D2.
12.
Firestone, W. A.
(1989). Educational policy as an ecology of games. Educational Researcher, 18, 18-24.
13.
Glackman, T.
, McDowell, E., Martin, R., Hyman, I., & Spino, P. (1978). Corporal punishment in the schools as it relates to race, sex, grade level, and suspensions. Inequality in education, 23, 1-23.
14.
Glazer, N.
(1978). Should judges administer social services? The Public Interest, 50, 64-80.
15.
Guarendi, R.
(1990). Back to the family: How to encourage traditional values in complicated times. New York: Villard.
16.
Hetrick, B.
, & Van Horn, C. (1988). Educational research information: Meeting the needs of state policymakers. Theory Into Practice, 27, 106-110.
17.
Horowitz, D.
(1977). The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
18.
Hyman, I.
(1984, October 17). Prepared statement presented on behalf of the American Psychological Association. Hearings before the subcommittee on juvenile justice, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
Johnson, C. A.
, & Canon, B. (1984). Judicial policies: Implementation and impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20.
Junker, B.
(1960). Field work: An introduction to social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Kingdon, J. W.
(1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
22.
Lamm, R. D.
, & Caldwell, R. A. (1990). Don't blame the schools for changes in values, culture, and families. In L. R. Marcus & B. D. Stickney (Eds.), Politics and policy in the age of education (pp. 288-295). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
23.
Lindblom, C.
(1980). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
McCormick, K.
(1992). Attitudes of primary care physicians toward corporal punishment. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 267, 3161-3165.
25.
Pressman, J. L.
, & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Ripley, R. B.
, & Franklin, G. A. (1984). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy. Belmont, CA: Dorsey.
27.
Segal, J.
, & Spaeth, H. (1993). The supreme court and the attitudinal model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Shaw, S.
, & Braden, J. (1990). Race and gender bias in the administration of corporal punishment. School Psychology Review, 19, 378-383.
29.
Smith, C. E.
(1993). Courts and public policy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
30.
Tyack, D. B.
(1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
Van Horn, C. E.
, Baumer, D. C., & Gormley, W. T. (1992). Politics and publicpolicy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
32.
Wagner, J.
(1995). Research universities, schools of education, and the schools: A case study of implementing cooperative research and extension in education. Educational Policy, 9,24-53.
33.
Wallace, R. D.
, Crawford, P., & Kirby M. E. (1995). Using task forces in local educational agencies to develop educational policy. In R. Ginsberg & D. Plank (Eds.), Commissions, reports, reforms, and educational policy (pp. 87-97). Westport, CT: Praeger.
34.
Wasby, S.
(1981). Arrogation of power or accountability: Judicial imperialism revisited. Judicature, 11, 208-219.
35.
Weiss, C. H.
(1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 23-81). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
