This article describes and discusses theoretically the development of a new institutional infrastructure for service coordination in a university-community- school partnership project in Chicago. Using insights from the New Institutionalism, it examines 5 aspects of infrastructure: (a) convening and goal-structuring processes, (b) institutional interests and reward systems, (c) relations to external environments through institutional activity, (d) communication linkages, and (e) institutional conventions. The findings reveal that most progress in developing infrastructure for service coordination in this Chicago case has grown out of the embedded routines or "scripts" that give structure and definition to the school as an institution. Efforts to develop coordinated activity that have come from outside those scripts and have attempted to change organizational behavior directly have been less successful. The importance of institutional considerations in promoting service coordination is explored along with other implications for policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, L.
(1994). Introduction and overview. In L. Adler & S. Gardner (Eds.), The politics of linking schools and social services (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: Falmer.
2.
Cibulka, J. E.
, Reed, R., & Wong, K. K (Eds.). (1992). The politics of urban education in the United States. Washington, DC: Falmer.
3.
Coleman, J. S.
(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
4.
Corbett, H. D.
, Dawson, J. A., &Firestone, W A. (1984). School context and school change: Implications for effective planning. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Crowson, R. L.
, & Boyd, W L. (1993). Coordinated services for children: Designing arks for storms and seas unknown. American Journal of Education, 101, 140-179.
6.
Crowson, R. L.
, & Boyd, W. L. (1994, September). Achieving coordinated, school-linking services: Facilitating utilization of the emerging knowledge base. Paper presented at the Conference on Improving Urban Schools: Better Strategies for the Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge, Alexandria, VA.
7.
DiMaggio, P. J.
, & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
8.
DiMaggio, P. J.
, & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Duke, D. L.
, & Stiggins, R J. (1985). Evaluating the performance of principals: A descriptive study. Educational Administration Quarterly,21(4), 71-98.
10.
Farrar, E.
, & Hampel, R. L. (1987). Social services in American high schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 297-303.
11.
Feiman-Nemser, S.
, & Floden, R. E. (1986). The culture of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 505-526). New York: Macmillan.
12.
Friedson, E.
(1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Gray, B.
(1991). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Heath, S. B
, & McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). A child resource policy: Moving beyond dependence on school and familyPhi Delta Kappan, 69, 576-580.
15.
House, E.
, & Laplan, S. (1978). Survival in the classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Hoyle, E.
(1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
17.
Kirst, M. W.
(1991). Improving children's services: Overcoming barriers, creating new opportunities. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 615-618.
18.
Lane, J. E.
(1993). The public sector: Concepts, models and approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
March, J. G.
, & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734-749.
20.
Meyer, J. W
, & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
21.
Miles, M. B.
, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Mitchell, D. E.
, Ortiz, E I., & Mitchell, T. K. (1987). Work orientation and job performance: The cultural basis of teaching rewards and incentives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Mitchell, D. E.
, & Scott, L. D. (1994). Professional and institutional perspectives on interagency collaboration. In L. Adler & S. Gardner (Eds.), The politics of linking schools and social services (pp. 75-91). Washington, DC: Falmer.
24.
Morris, V. C.
, Crowson, R. L., Porter-Gehrie, C, & Hurwitz, E., Jr. (1984). Principals in action: The reality of managing schools. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
25.
Nucci, L. P.
, & Smylie, M. A. (1991). University-community partnerships: Addressing problems of children and youth through institutional collaboration. Metropolitan Universities, 2(1), 83-91.
26.
Powell, W. W.
, & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Rossman, G. B.
, Corbett, H. D., & Firestone, W A. (1988). Change and effectiveness in schools: A cultural perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Skaff, L. G.
(1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, 67, 217-230.
29.
Smylie, M. A.
, & Crowson, R. L. (1993). Principal assessment under restructured governance. Peabody Journal of Education,68(2), 64-84.
30.
Smylie, M. A.
, Crowson, R. L., & Chou, V. (1994). Administrative issues in coordinated children's services: A Chicago case study. In R. A. Levin (Ed.), Greater than the sum: Professionals in a comprehensive services model (Teacher Education Monograph No. 17, pp. 115-126). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
31.
Smylie, M. A.
, Crowson, R. L., Chou, V., & Levin, R. A. (1994). The principal and community-school connections in Chicago's radical reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 342-364.
32.
Stake, R. E.
(1986). Quieting reform: Social science and social action in an urban youth program. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Syracuse University Research Corporation
(1971). The potential role of the school as a site for integrating social services (Policy memorandum SYR 71-5). Syracuse, NYSyracuse University Research Corporation, Educational Policy Research Center.
34.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
Trist, E.
(1977). Collaboration in work settings: A personal perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13, 268-278.
36.
Tyack, D.
(1992). Health and social services in public schools: Historical perspectives. The Future of Children, 2(1), 19-31.
37.
Wehlage, G.
, Smith, F., & Lipman, P. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The New Futures experience. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 55-96.
38.
Yin, R. K.
(1989). Case study research: Design and methods (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Zellman, G. L.
(1990). Linking schools and social services: The case of child abuse reporting. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 41-55.
40.
Zucker, L. G.
(1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
