The rapid growth in education expenditure in a time of declining earnings and increased economic inequality presents both obstacles and opportunities for school finance reform. Opportunities are greatest for reforms that increase funding for low-achieving students, rather than schools, based on efficiency arguments. Special-education policy is one possible model for such reform. Evidence regarding school resource allocation processes and production efficiency is used to evaluate the potential impacts of increased spending on education outcomes, how much funding might be required to meet various goals, and the extent to which school restructuring strategies might improve efficiency. The author concludes that school finance reform policies may generate responses by families that offset at least some of their intended effects, and policies should be designed to minimize this problem. New research raises questions about conventional assumptions about educational production and cost, with implications for policy and research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bamett, W. S.
(1993). Benefit-cost analysis of preschool education: Findings from a 25-year follow-up.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(4), 500-508.
2.
Becker, G. S.
(1982). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bickel, W. E.
, & Bickel, D. P. (1986). Effective schools, classrooms, and instruction: Implications for special education.Exceptional Children, 52(6), 489-500.
4.
Biklen, D.
, Fergusson, D., & Ford, A. (Eds.). (1989). Schooling and disability (NSSE Yearbook Series). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Clune, W. H.
(1990). Educational governance and student achievement. In W. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education. Volume 2. Philadelphia: Falmer.
6.
Clune, W. H.
(1993a). School finance reform: The role of the courts (CPRE Finance Center Policy Brief). New Brunswick, NJ: CPRE, Rutgers University.
7.
Clune, W. H.
(1993b). The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance.The World and I, 8(9), 389-405.
8.
Cohn, E.
, & Geske, T. G. (1990). The economics of education. New York: Pergamon.
9.
Cooper, B. S. (1993). School-site cost allocations: Testing a micro-financial model in 23 districts in 10 states. Unpublished manuscript, Fordham University.
10.
Fergusson, R. F.
(1992). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters.Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-498.
11.
Goertz, M.
(1991). A quest for equal educational opportunity in New Jersey: Abbott v. Burke and the Quality Education Act of 1990 (Working Paper No. 19). Princeton: Program for New Jersey Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.
12.
Hanushek, E.
(1986). The economics of schooling.Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.
13.
Hedges, L. V.
, Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes (An exchange: Part 1). Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
14.
Hentschke, G. C.
(1988). Budgetary theory and reality: A microview. In D. H. Monk & J. Underwood (Eds.), Microlevel school finance: Issues and implications for policy (pp. 311-338). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
15.
Hilliard, A. G.
(1992). The pitfalls and promises of special education practice.Exceptional Children, 59(2), 168-172.
16.
Hughes, J.
, Moon, C. G., & Barnett, W. S. (1993, October). Revenue-driven costs: The case of resource allocation in public primary and secondary education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Atlantic Economic Society, Philadelphia, PA.
17.
Jenkins, J. R.
, Pious, C. G., & Jewell, M. (1990). Special education and the regular education initiative: Basic assumptions.Exceptional Children, 56(6), 479-491.
18.
Kaus, M.
(1992). The end of equality. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Kirst, M. W.
(1988). The internal allocation of resources within U.S. school districts. In D. H. Monk & J. Underwood (Eds.), Microlevel school finance: Issues and implications for policy (pp. 365-389). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20.
Kozol, J.
(1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Crown.
21.
Levy, F.
, & Murnane, R. J. (1992). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations.Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333-1381.
22.
Lipsky, D.
, & Gartner, A. (Eds.). (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Brookes.
23.
Monk, D. H.
(1991). Education productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Paper prepared for the 1991 Finance Forum of the CPRE Finance Center.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics.
(1991). Projections of education statistics to 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Niskanen, W. A.
(1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
26.
Reynolds, A. J.
(1992). Mediated effects of preschool intervention.Early Education and Development, 3, 139-164.
27.
Reynolds, A. J.
(1993, November). One year of preschool or two: Does it matter for low-income Black children from the inner city? Paper presented at the Second National Head Start Research Conference, Washington, DC.
28.
Reynolds, A. J.
, & Bezruczko, N. (1993). School adjustment of children at risk through fourth grade.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 457-480.
29.
Sander, W.
, & Krautmann, A. C. (1991). Local taxes, schooling, and jobs in Illinois.Economics of Education Review, 10(2), 111-121.
30.
Solorzano, L.
(1987, April 27). Beating back the education "Blob."U.S. News & World Report, p. 39.
31.
Witte, J. F.
(1990, September). Understanding high school achievement: After a decade of research do we have any confident policy recommendations? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
32.
Wycoff, P. G.
(1991). A new case for vouchers.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), 112-116.
