This article is a case study of the Florida Educational Reform Act of 1983, a teacher merit pay program, and focuses on comparison with similar programs in other states and countries for analyzing the policy process regarding educational reform. The inception, implementation, and decline of the reform are studied using the concepts of coalition building, fiscal support, and the various arenas in which salient actors worked: legislative and executive, administrative, professional organizations, and the workplace of teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, K.
(1985). Executive leadership and educational reform in Florida. In V. D. Mueller & M. P. McKeown (Eds.), The fiscal, legal, and political aspects of state reform of elementary and secondary education (pp. 145-168). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
2.
Allen, P. J.
(1991). The allocation of lottery revenue to education in Florida, California, Michigan, and Illinois. Educational Policy, 5, 296-311.
3.
Bacharach, S. B.
, Bamberger, P., & Mitchell, S. (1990). Work design, role conflict, and role ambiguity: The case of elementary and secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 415-432.
4.
Bacharach, S. B.
, & Shedd, J. B. (1988). Power and empowerment: The constraining myths and emerging structures of teacher unionism in an age of reform. Journal of Education Policy, 3(5), 139-160.
5.
Bardack, E.
(1978). The implementation game. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
Berman, P.
& McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational changes, Vol. 4. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
7.
Firestone, W. A.
(1989). Educational policy as an ecology of games. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 18-24.
8.
Governor's Commission on Secondary Schools for the State of Florida.
(1983). Secondary education: A report to the citizens of Florida [Brown's report]. Tallahassee: Executive Office of the Governor of Florida.
9.
Johnson, S. M.
(1984). Merit pay for teachers: A poor prescription for reform. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 175-185.
10.
Journal of the House of Representatives. (1983, April 5). Tallahassee: Florida House of Representatives.
11.
Kelly, G. P.
(1988). Excellence in teaching and career ladders: Reflections from colonial Vietnam. Educational Foundations, 2(1), 31-51.
12.
MGT of America, Inc.
(1985). A project to provide a review of the implementation of the Florida master teacher program. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
13.
Majone, G.
, & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation as evolution. In J. Pressman & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Implementation (pp. 163-180). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Malen, B.
, Murphy, M. J., & Geary, S. (1988). The role of evaluation information in legislative decision making: A case study of a loose cannon on deck. Theory into Practice, 27, 111-125.
15.
Mumane, R. J.
, & Cohen, D. K. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and a few survive. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 1-17.
16.
Nakamura, R. T.
, & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin.
17.
Profiles of Florida school districts, 1981. (1981). Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education.
18.
Thomas, S. B.
, & Welsh, L. D. (1984). The use and abuse of lotteries as a revenue source. Journal of Education Finance, 9, 282-311.
