Abstract
Education leaders increasingly seek to integrate data into decision-making processes as they confront difficult choices about how to invest public resources. This paper assesses the consequences of data-driven decisions related to systems-level investments in career and technical education (CTE). Using Massachusetts administrative records, we evaluate various decision rules—from simple population-based approaches to sophisticated predictive models—for forecasting CTE concentration. We find investing in data quality yields greater predictive accuracy than complex modeling alone. Simulations indicate allocating resources based on model predictions could increase representation of educationally disadvantaged students in CTE, underscoring predictive analytics’ potential to enhance equity and efficiency simultaneously.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
