Since 2020, legislators across the country have introduced bills aimed at banning instruction of Critical Race Theory in universities. This qualitative study examined 53 bills, most of which contained lists of “divisive concepts” that professors were prohibited from discussing in their classrooms. In addition, I analyzed 26 statements made by supporters of the bills that provided justification for the anti-CRT bans. The data exposed four Discourse Models upheld by these bills and their supporting statements using critical discourse analysis, tools developed by Gee, and legal analysis. The Discourse Models included Neoliberalism, Extreme Nationalism, Colorblindness, and Law as Morality.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP.ReichB. (2021). Nation-building and education. Econometrics Journal, 131(638), 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab001
6.
American Association of University Professors. (1915). Declaration of principles on academic freedom and academic tenure. http://tinyurl.com/5yeywu2s
7.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
8.
ApplebaumB. (2008). White privilege/white complicity: Connecting “benefiting from” to “contributing to. Philosophy of Education, 64, 292–300. http://tinyurl.com/y676fxkn
9.
ApplebaumB. (2022). Willful hermeneutical ignorance and the “critical race theory” controversy. Educational Theory, 72(6), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12553
BergerR. J. (2014). Academic freedom and its discontents: An autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2014.7.2.258
16.
BertrandA. R.LyonM. A.JacobsenR. (2024). Narrative spillover: A narrative policy framework analysis of critical race theory discourse at multiple levels. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 391–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12523
17.
BissellT. (2023). Teaching in the upside down: What anti-critical race theory laws tell us about the first amendment. Stanford Law Review, 75(1), 205–259.
18.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (Ed.). (2022). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
Bonilla-SilvaE.EmbrickD. G.Scott CarterJ.LippardC. D. (2020). Protecting whiteness: Whitelash and the rejection of racial equality. University of Washington Press.
CabreraN. L. (2018). White guys on campus. Rutgers University Press.
25.
CardnoC. (2019). Policy document analysis: A practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration Theory and Practice Journal, 24(4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.016
CrenshawK. (2021, July4). Unlearning history. The Washington Post, B1.
30.
CrenshawK. (2022). This is not a drill: The war against antiracist teaching in America. UCLA Law Review, 68(6), 1702–1729.
31.
CreswellJ. W.GuettermanT. C. (Eds.). (2018). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
32.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
33.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (1993). Imposition. William and Mary Law Review, 35(1), 1025–1059.
34.
DruckmanD. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism, and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 38(1), 43–68.
35.
EasterbrookF. H. (1988). The role of original intent in statutory construction. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 11(1), 59–66.
36.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
37.
FaircloughN. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
38.
FeaginJ. R.HohleR. (2017). Racism in the neoliberal era: A meta history of elite white power. Routledge.
39.
FeaginJ. R.O’BrienE. (2004). White men on race: Power, privilege, and the shaping of cultural consciousness. Beacon Press.
40.
FeingoldJ. P. (2022). Reclaiming equality: How regressive laws can advance progressive ends. South Carolina Law Review, 73(3), 723–758.
41.
FilimonL. M.IvănescuM. (2024). Bans, sanctions, and dogwhistles: A review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020. Policy Studies, 45(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088
GeeJ. P. (Ed.). (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). Routledge.
46.
GeeJ. P. (2011). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 22–67). Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
GeeJ. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
48.
GirouxH. A. (2003). Spectacles of race and pedagogies of denial: Anti-black racist pedagogy under the reign of neoliberalism. Communication Education, 52(3–4), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452032000156190
49.
GirouxH. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
50.
GoldbergD. T. (2009). The threat of race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism. John Wiley & Sons.
51.
GreenbergM. (2011). Legislation as communication? Legal interpretation and the study of linguistic communication. In MarmorA.SoamesS. (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of language in the law (pp. 217–256). Oxford University Press.
HamiltonV. E. (2021). Reform, retrench, repeat: The campaign against critical race theory, through the lens of critical race theory. William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice, 28(1), 61–102.
IronsP. H. (2022). White men’s law: The roots of systemic racism. Oxford University Press.
63.
JayakumarU. M. (2022). Introduction: CRT in higher education: Confronting the “boogeyman” bans, censorship, and attacks on racial justice. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3726/ptihe.032022.0001
KezarA. (2023). Higher education DEI efforts are in trouble. Here’s how we change that. In WatsonJ. (Ed.) Diverse issues in higher education (Vol. 40, pp. 40–40). Cox, Matthews & Associates.
70.
KimR. (2021). Under the law: ‘Anti-critical race theory’ laws and the assault on pedagogy. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(1), 64–65.
71.
KingC. (2020). Gods of the upper air: How a circle of renegade anthropologists reinvented race, sex, and gender in the twentieth century. Anchor.
72.
KoyamaJ. (2024). The bans on teaching CRT and other “divisive concepts” in America’s public schools. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2023.2259813
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236863
LeonardoZ. (2020). The Trump presidency, post-colorblindness and the reconstruction of public race speech. In ObasagieO. K. (Ed.), Trumpism and its discontents (pp. 18–37). Berkeley Public Policy Press.
81.
LiouD. D.AlvaraR. (2021). Anti-critical race theory movement in postsecondary education: Faculty expectations confronting emotionalities of whiteness. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(4), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.52547/johepal.2.4.77
82.
LitowitzD. (2000). Gramsci, hegemony, and the law. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2000(2), 515.
83.
LoBueA.DouglassS. (2023) When white parents aren’t so nice: The politics of anti-CRT and anti-equity policy in post-pandemic America, Peabody Journal of Education, 98:5, 548–561, https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2261324
84.
LopezI. H. (1997). White by law: The legal construction of race. NYU Press.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (Eds.). (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
88.
MatsudaM. (1987). Looking to the bottom: critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 323.
89.
MearnsG. (2014). The neoliberal agenda and social work values: Using critical discourse analysis to explore the role of language in processes of cultural hegemony. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986014x13987662561417
90.
MikelatouA.ArvanitisE. (2018). Social inclusion and active citizenship under the prism of neoliberalism: A critical analysis of the European Union’s discourse of lifelong learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1382348
91.
MillerV.FernandezF.HutchensN. (2023). The race to ban race: Legal and critical arguments against state legislation to ban critical race theory in higher education. Missouri Law Review, 88(61), 61–106.
MooreM. S. (2007). Four reflections on law and morality. William and Mary Law Review, 48(5), 1523–1570.
97.
MummendeyA.KlinkA.BrownR. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(Pt. 2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164740
OmiM.WinantH. (2006). The racial state. In BolariaB. S.HierS. P. (Eds.), Identity and belonging: Rethinking race and ethnicity in Canadian society (pp. 101–115). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
107.
OmiM.WinantH. (Eds.). (2015). Racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). Routledge.
108.
Oxford. (2007). Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://www.oed.com/
109.
OzakiA. (2021, June16). Gov. Ricketts steps up attack on critical race theory. KETV. http://tinyurl.com/yc5msr78
RichmondB. S.ToosiN. R.WellmanJ. D.WilkinsC. L. (2024). Ignorance of critical race theory predicts White Americans’ opposition to it. Journal of Social Issues, 80(1), 240–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12601
116.
RosenfeldC. (2021). Do you hear the people sign?: A critical discourse analysis of comments on a 2015 online petition opposing North Carolina’s ag-gag law. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 49(5), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2021.1965185
117.
RossT. (1990). The rhetorical tapestry of race: White innocence and black abstraction. William and Mary Law Review, 32(1), 1–40.
118.
SaldañaJ. (Ed.). (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
SchertzerR.WoodsE. T. (2022). The new nationalism in America and beyond: The deep roots of ethnic nationalism in the digital age. Oxford University Press.
122.
SchoormanD.GatensR. (2024). Understanding Florida’s HB7: A policy of intimidation by confusion. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048241235405
123.
ScottJ. W.MoyersB. (2019). Knowledge, power, and academic freedom. Columbia University Press.
SpringJ. H. (2012). Corporatism, social control, and cultural domination in education: From the radical right to globalization: The selected works of Joel Spring. Taylor & Francis Group.
126.
Supertalk Mississippi. (2022, March14). Gov. Reeves signs bill seeking to ban the teaching of CRT. http://tinyurl.com/4k9s4rm3
VanceJ. D. (2021, November2). J.D. Vance’s keynote address at the second national conservatism conference [speech video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FR65Cifnhw
131.
WardL. (2022). The real “Boogeyman”: How white legal logic is used to create educational gag order laws in US higher education. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education, 4(3), 13–27.
132.
WodakR.MeyerM. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
ZookG. F. (1947). The president’s commission on higher education. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 33(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/40221180
