As postsecondary developmental education policy reforms are implemented, increased attention must be given to students with learning and attention disabilities. The purpose of this study was to bring these students into the conversation, by examining their representation in developmental education broadly, as well the effect of this intervention on their college persistence and credit accumulation. Results show students with learning or attention disabilities are overrepresented in developmental education and could experience heterogenous effects on their postsecondary outcomes. Policymakers should be purposeful about consideration of this growing group of students in continued developmental education reforms.
BaileyT.JeongD. W.ChoS.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002
3.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work?Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.44.3.736
4.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299606200502
5.
BoatmanA.BennettC. T. (2021). A switch in time: The academic effects of shifting math remediation from college to high school. Education Finance and Policy, 16(3), 464–492. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00312
6.
BoatmanA.ClaroS.FresardM.KramerJ. W. (2022). Do corequisite math courses improve academic outcomes in technical colleges? Evidence from Chile. Research in Higher Education, 63(3), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09649-5
7.
BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717715708
BrookhartM. A.SchneeweissS.RothmanK. J.GlynnR. J.AvornJ.StürmerT. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(12), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj149
10.
CalcagnoJ. C.LongB. T. (2008). The impact of postsecondary remediation using a regression discontinuity approach: Addressing endogenous sorting and noncompliance (Working Paper 14194). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14194
11.
CaliendoM.KopeinigS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
12.
ChenX.SimoneS. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (NCES 2016-405). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016405.pdf
13.
ChibaC.LowR. (2007). A course-based model to promote successful transition to college for students with learning disorders. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 20(1), 40–53.
14.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.MuschkinC.VigdorJ. L. (2015). Developmental education in North Carolina community colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714547267
15.
CortelliaC.HorowitzS. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
16.
DaughertyL.GerberR.MartorellF.MillerT.WeisburstE. (2021). Heterogeneity in the effects of college course placement. Research in Higher Education, 62(7), 1086–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09630-2
17.
DenhartH. (2008). Deconstructing barriers: Perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(6), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408321151
18.
Di Lonardo BurrS. M.LeFevreJ. (2020). Confidence is key: Unlocking the relations between ADHD symptoms and math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 77, 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101808
19.
DiPreteT. A.EirichG. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.
20.
DolmageJ. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
21.
DuchiniE. (2017). Is college remedial education a worthy investment? New evidence from a sharp regression discontinuity design. Economics of Education Review, 60, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.06.004
22.
DuPaulG. J.Dahlstrom-HakkiI.GormleyM. J.FuQ.PinhoT. D.BanerjeeM. (2017). College students with ADHD and LD: Effects of support services on academic performance. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12143
23.
DuPaulG. J.PinhoT. D.PollackB. L.GormleyM. J.LaracyS. D. (2017). First-year college students with ADHD and/or LD: Differences in engagement, positive core self-evaluation, school preparation, and college expectations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415617164
24.
EaganK.Bara StolzenbergE.ZimmermanH. B.AragonM. C.Whang SaysonH.Rios-AguilarC. (2017). The American freshman: National norms Fall 2016. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
HotezE.RosenauK. A.FernandesP.EaganK.SheaL.KuoA. A. (2022). A national cross-sectional study of the characteristics, strengths, and challenges of college students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Cureus, 14(1), 21520. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21520
29.
HughesC. A.SmithJ. O. (1990). Cognitive and academic performance of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510393
30.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599
31.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013
32.
JaggarsS. S.BickerstaffS. (2018). Developmental education: The evolution of research and reform. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 469–503). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_10
33.
KaneT. J.BoatmanA.KozakowskiW.BennettC.HitchR.WeisenfeldD. (2018). Remedial math goes to high school: An evaluation of the Tennessee SAILS program. Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University. https://cepr.harvard.edu/SAILS
34.
KaneT. J.BoatmanA.KozakowskiW.BennettC.HitchR.WeisenfeldD. (2019). College remediation goes back to high school: Evidence from a statewide program in Tennessee (Working Paper 26133). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26133
35.
KaneT. J.BoatmanA.KozakowskiW.BennettC.HitchR.WeisenfeldD. (2021). Is college remediation a barrier or a boost? Evidence from the Tennessee SAILS program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(3), 883–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22306
36.
KimE.AquinoK. C. (2017). Disability as diversity in higher education: Policies and practices to enhance student success. Routledge.
37.
KimballE.WellsR. S.LauterbachA.ManlyC. A.OstiguyB. (2016). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In PaulsenM. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 91–156). Springer.
KochL. C.LoW.-J.MamiseishviliK.LeeD.HillJ. (2018). The effect of learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and psychiatric disabilities on three-year persistence outcomes at four-year higher education institutions. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180944
40.
KochL. C.MamiseishviliK.WilkinsM. J. (2016). Postsecondary integration and persistence: A comparison of students with psychiatric disabilities to students with learning disabilities/attention deficit disorders. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education; Athens, 30(3), 259–275.
41.
KosiewiczH.NgoF.FongK. (2016). Alternative models to deliver developmental math: Issues of use and student access. Community College Review, 44(3), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552116651490
42.
KrankeD.JacksonS. E.TaylorD. A.Anderson-FyeE.FloerschJ. (2013). College student disclosure of non-apparent disabilities to receive classroom accommodations. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(1), 35–51.
43.
LaitusisC. C.MorganD. L.BridgemanB.ZannaJ.StoneE. (2007). Examination of fatigue effects from extended-time accommodations on the SAT reasoning test. ETS Research Report Series, 2007(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02073.x
44.
LogueA. W.DouglasD.Watanabe-RoseM. (2019). Corequisite mathematics remediation: Results over time and in different contexts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719848777
45.
LogueA. W.Watanabe-RoseM.DouglasD. (2016). Should students assessed as needing remedial mathematics take college-level quantitative courses instead? A randomized controlled trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 578–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716649056
46.
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.TaconetA. (2023). Quality indicators of secondary data analyses in special education research: A preregistration guide. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141029
47.
MadausJ. W.McKeownK.GelbarN.BanerjeeM. (2012). The online and blended learning experience: Differences for students with and without learning disabilities and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 1(1), 21–36.
48.
ManlyC. A.WellsR. S. (2015). Reporting the use of multiple imputation for missing data in higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9344-9
49.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CrowellE. W. (2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300502
50.
MeiselmanA. Y.SchuddeL. (2022). The impact of corequisite math on community college student outcomes: Evidence from Texas. Education Finance and Policy, 17(4), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00365
51.
MertonR. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
52.
MertonR. K. (1988). The Matthew Effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science Society, 79(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848
53.
MokherC. G.Park-GaghanT. J.HuS. (2022). Does developmental education reform help or hinder the success of language minority students? An exploration by language minority, ESOL, and foreign-born status. Education Finance and Policy, 18(3), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00364
54.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2019). Profile of undergraduate students: Attendance, distance and remedial education, degree program and field of study, demographics, financial aid, financial literacy, employment, and military status: 2015–16 (NCES 2019-467). RTI International. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019467
55.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). National Center for Special Education Research.
56.
ParkE. S.NgoF. (2021). The effect of developmental math on stem participation in community college: Variation by race, gender, achievement, and aspiration. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720973727
57.
ParkT. J.TandbergD. A.HuS.HankersonD. (2016). One policy, disparate reactions: Institutional responses in Florida’s developmental education reform. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(10), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1131644
58.
Park-GaghanT. J.MokherC. G.HuX.SpencerH.HuS. (2020). What happened following comprehensive developmental education reform in the Sunshine State? The impact of Florida’s developmental education reform on introductory college-level course completion. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20933876
59.
PerlowE.WellsR.HedayetM.XiaJ.MacleanH.DingE.McCallA. (2021). Hidden inequality: Financial aid information available to college students with disabilities attending public four-year institutions. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 50(3/4), 1–23. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jsfa/vol50/iss3/4
60.
RanF. X.LinY. (2022). The effects of corequisite remediation: Evidence from a statewide reform in Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(3), 458–484. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211070836
61.
RaueK.LewisL. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions (NCES 2011–018). National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011018.pdf
62.
RichmanE. L.RademacherK. N.MaitlandT. L. (2014). Coaching and college success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(1), 33–50.
63.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley.
64.
RubinD. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465
SchneiderB.CarnoyM.KilpatrickJ.SchmidtW. H.ShavelsonR. J. (2005). Estimating causal effects: Using experimental and observational methods [A Think Tank White Paper prepared under the auspices of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program]. AERA.
67.
SchuddeL.KeislerK. (2019). The relationship between accelerated Dev-Ed coursework and early college milestones: Examining college momentum in a reformed mathematics pathway. AERA Open, 5(1), 2332858419829435. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419829435
68.
Scott-ClaytonJ.RodriguezO. (2015). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation policy. Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 4–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00150
69.
SextonC. C.GelhornH. L.BellJ. A.ClassiP. M. (2012). The co-occurrence of reading disorder and ADHD: Epidemiology, treatment, psychosocial impact, and economic burden. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407772
70.
ShifrerD. (2013). Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513503346
71.
ShifrerD. (2016). Stigma and stratification limiting the math course progression of adolescents labeled with a learning disability. Learning and Instruction, 42, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.001
72.
ShifrerD.CallahanR. M.MullerC. (2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213479439
73.
SparksR. L.LovettB. J. (2009). Objective criteria for classification of postsecondary students as learning disabled: Effects on prevalence rates and group characteristics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331040
74.
TurkJ. M. (2019). Estimating the impact of developmental education on associate degree completion: A Dose–response approach. Research in Higher Education, 60(8), 1090–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09549-9
75.
ValentineJ. C.KonstantopoulosS.Goldrick-RabS. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 806–833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317709237
76.
van Buuren. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. CRC Press.
77.
VogeD. (2008). Developmental or remedial?Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 25(1), 88–90.
78.
WhinneryE.PompeliaS. (2019). Common elements of developmental education policies. Education Commission of the States. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED594083
XuD.DadgarM. (2018). How effective are community college remedial math courses for students with the lowest math skills?Community College Review, 46(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552117743789
81.
YamadaH.BrykA. S. (2016). Assessing the first two years’ effectiveness of Statway®: A multilevel model with propensity score matching. Community College Review, 44(3), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552116643162
82.
YanokJ. (1993). College students with learning disabilities enrolled in developmental education programs. College Student Journal, 27(2), 166–174.
83.
YuanF. (1994). Moving toward self-acceptance: A course for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 29(5), 301.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
