The 2020 health pandemic and high-profile police murders of Black people inspired national conversations about racism and police brutality. This study examined how Intermediary Public Policy Organizations (IPPOs) discursively engaged with the racialized nature of the pandemic and the police murder of George Floyd, which have increased awareness of systemic racism in society. Our discursive analysis of IPPO statements published during these events revealed a pattern of humanizing higher education institutions, race evasive policy proposals, and a lack of policy action addressing systemic racism. IPPO evasion of race is consequential because it has the potential to limit the ability of public policy to dismantle systems of oppression and highlights the need for race-conscious policies to support Black, Indigenous, and people of color students and communities.
AllanA. J.TolbertA. R. (2019). Advancing social justice with policy discourse analysis. In StrunkK. K.LockeL. A. (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 137–149). Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AllanE. J. (2009). Feminist poststructuralism meets policy analysis. In AllanE. J.Van Deventer IversonS.Ropers-HuilmanR. (Eds.), Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives (pp. 11–35). Taylor & Francis Group.
BensimonE. M. (2020). The case for anti-racist stance towards paying off higher education’s racial debt. Change Magazine: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(2), 7–11.
8.
BirklandT.A. (2011). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policymaking (3rd ed.). M.E. Sharpe.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE.DietrichD. (2011). The sweet enchantment of color-blind racism in Obameria. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 634(1), 190–206.
10.
ClayK. L. (2019). ‘Despite the odds’: Unpacking the politics of Black resilience neoliberalism. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 75–110.
De LissovoyN. (2012). Conceptualizing the carceral turn: Neoliberalism, racism, and violation. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 739–755.
13.
DixsonA. D.BurasK. L.JeffersE. K. (2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557826
14.
FaircloughN.FaircloughI. (2012). Political discourse analysis. Routledge.
15.
FelixE. R.TrinidadA. (2020). The decentralization of race: Tracing the dilution of racial equity in educational policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(4), 465–490.
GabrielR. E. (2020). Converting to privatization: A discourse analysis of dyslexia policy narratives. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219861945
18.
GándaraD. (2019). Does evidence matter? An analysis of evidence use in performance-funding policy designs in two states. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 991–1022.
19.
GándaraD. (2020). How the sausage is made: An examination of a state funding model design process. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 192–221.
20.
GándaraD.JonesS. (2020). Who deserves benefits in higher education? A policy discourse analysis of a process surrounding reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. The Review of Higher Education, 44(1), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0037
21.
GándaraD.NessE.C. (2019). Ideological think tank activity and the politics of college affordability in the states. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(5), 717–743.
GirouxH. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
24.
GouldE.WilsonV. (2020). Black workers face two of the most lethal preexisting conditions for coronavirus: Racism and economic inequality [Policy brief.]Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/black-workers-covid/
25.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29.
26.
HonigM. I. (2004). The new middle management: Intermediary organizations in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 65–87.
27.
H.R. 6194, 116 USC. (2020). To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to treat certain programs of education converted to distance learning by reason of emergencies and health-related situations in the same manner as programs of education pursued at educational institutions, and for other purposes. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6194
28.
IssarS. (2021). Listening to Black lives matter: Racial capitalism and the critique of neoliberalism. Contemporary Political Theory, 20, 48–71.
29.
KendiI. X. (2019). How to be an anti-racist. Penguin.
30.
KingdonJ. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Longman Classics in Political Science.
31.
KovacsP.BoylesD. (2005). Institutes, foundations and think tanks: Neoconservative influences on U.S. public schools. Public Resistance, 1(1), 1–18.
32.
La LondeP. G.BrewerT. J.LubienskiC. A. (2015). Teach For America and Teach For All: Creating an intermediary organization network for global education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(47). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1829.
McDonaldL. (2013). In their own words: U.S. think tank “experts” and the framing of education policy debates. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(3), 1–28.
35.
McDonaldL. (2014). Think tanks and the media: How the conservative movement gained entry into the education policy arena. Educational Policy, 28(6), 845–880.
36.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
37.
MillerG. N. S.MorphewC. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: Agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 754–784.
NatowR. S. (2015). From Capitol Hill to Dupont circle and beyond: The influence of policy actors in the federal higher education rulemaking process. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(3), 360–386.
42.
NewfieldC. (2008). Unmaking the public university: The forty-year assault on the middle class. Harvard University Press.
OrphanC. M.GildersleeveR. E.MillsA. P. (2020). State of rhetoric: Neoliberal discourses for education in state of the state addresses and gubernatorial press releases. Journal of Education Policy, 35(3), 394–420.
45.
OrphanC. M.LadermanS.GildersleeveR. E. (2021). Advocates or honest brokers? Examining the higher education public policy agenda-setting processes of intermediary organizations. The Review of Higher Education, 44(3), 325–355.
PernaL. W.OroszK.KentC. (2019). The role and contribution of academic researchers in congressional hearings: A critical discourse analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 111–145.
48.
PirtleW. N. L. (2020). Racial capitalism: A fundamental cause of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic inequities in the United States. Higher Education and Behavior, 47(4), 504–508.
49.
SavageG. C. (2015). Think tanks, education and policy elite actors. Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 35–53.
50.
SchattschneiderE.E. (1975). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Cengage Learning Publishing.
51.
ScottJ.JabbarH. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257.
52.
ScottJ.LubienskiC.DeBrayE.JabbarH. (2014). The intermediary function in evidence production, promotion, and utilization: The case of educational incentives. In FinniganK. S.DalyA. J. (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill (pp. 69–89). Springer.
53.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2015). The role of financial aid in promoting college access and success: Research evidence and proposals for reform. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 45(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1586
54.
ShamirR. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.
55.
SquireD. D.NicolazzoZPerezR. J. (2019). Institutional responses as non-performative: What university communications (Don’t) say about movements towards justice. The Review of Higher Education, 42(2019), 109–133.
56.
SquireD. D.WilliamsB. C.TuittF. A. (2018). Plantation politics and neoliberal racism in higher education: A framework for reconstructing anti-racist institutions. Teachers College Record, 120(14), 1–20.
57.
SupovitzJ.McGuinnP. (2019). Interest group activity in the context of common Core implementation. Educational Policy, 33(3), 453–485.
58.
TrujilloT. (2014). The modern cult of efficiency: Intermediary organizations and the new scientific management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207–232.
59.
WhiteJ. A.DacheA. (2020). “A lot of inner-city kids”: How financial aid policies and practices reflect the social field of color-blind racism at a community college urban campus. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1649220
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital?Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
