This paper centers the voices of students who successfully struggled alongside justice-minded school board members and other concerned citizens to create anti-racist policy changes in Alexandria City Public Schools, Virginia. Specifically, we examine the history behind, and political processes involved with, changing the names of two local schools due to the racist political commitments of their namesakes. Lessons learned include the need to carefully structure the policy change process to include students, families, and other community members in critical dialog and amplify the voices of those most impacted by the structural racism that needs to be dismantled: The students.
AdamsN. (1997). Toward a curriculum of resiliency: Gender, race, adolescence and schooling. In MarshallC. (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 153–164). Falmer Press.
BeachumF. D. (2018). The every student succeeds act and multicultural education: A critical race theory analysis. Teachers College Record, 120(13), 1–18.
BertrandM. (2014). Reciprocal dialogue between educational decision makers and students of color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 812–843.
8.
BertrandM.BrooksM. D.DomínguezA. D. (2020). Challenging adultism: Centering youth as educational decision makers. Urban Education, 1–28.
9.
BettencourtG. M. (2020). Embracing problems, processes, and contact zones: Using youth participatory action research to challenge adultism. Action Research, 18(2), 153–170.
10.
BiehlB. (2008). The performance of women and men in organisations: A theatre studies approach. Gender in Management An International Journal, 23(7), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410810908866
11.
BrasofM.MansfieldK. C. (2018). Student voice and school leadership: Introduction. Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership. Special Issue 1: Student Voice and School Leadership, 5–8. http://cojeel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/JEELSI1Intro.pdf
12.
BrunsmaD. L.ChapmanN. G.KimJ. W.LellockJ. S.UnderhillM.WithersE. T.WyseJ. P. (2020). The culture of white space: On the racialized production of meaning. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(14), 2001–2015.
13.
CobbR. W.RossM. H. (1997). Cultural strategies of agenda denial: Avoidance, attack, and redefinition. University Press of Kansas.
14.
ConnorJ. O.RosenS. M. (2015). Zombies, truants, and flash mobs: How youth organizers respond to and shape youth policy. National Society for the Study of Education, 114(1), 203–220.
15.
CresswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
DiemS.WeltonA. D. (2020). Anti-racist educational leadership and policy: Addressing racism in public education. Routledge.
18.
EdelmanM. (1967/1985). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press.
19.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
20.
FarleyA. N.LeonardiB.DonnorJ. K. (2021). Perpetuating inequalities: The role of political distraction in education policy. Educational Policy, 35(2), 163–179.
GillbornD. (2016). Education policy as an act of white supremacy. In TaylorE.GillbornD.Ladson-BillingsG. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education (2nd ed., pp. 43–59). Taylor & Francis.
23.
GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2006). Introduction. In GinwrightS.CammarotaJ.NogueraP. (Eds.), Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change (pp. xiii–xxii). Taylor & Francis Group.
24.
GirouxH. A. (2003). The abandoned generation: Democracy beyond the culture of fear. Palgrave-MacMillan.
25.
GordonJ. A. (2005). In search of educators of color. Leadership, 35(2), 30–35.
26.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791.
KingdonJ. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Longman.
33.
LacV. T.MansfieldK. C. (2018). What do students have to do with educational leadership?: Making a case for centering student voice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117743748
Lawrence-LightfootS.DavisJ. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass.
36.
MansfieldK. C. (2014). How listening to student voices informs and strengthens social justice research and practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(3), 392–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13505288
37.
MansfieldK. C. (2015). Giftedness as property: Troubling whiteness, wealth, and gifted education in the US. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 143–142.
38.
MansfieldK. C. (2016). The color of giftedness: A policy genealogy implicating educators past, present, and future. Educational Studies, 52(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2016.1190364
39.
MansfieldK. C.ThachikS. L. (2016). A critical policy analysis of Texas’ closing the Gaps 2015. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.V24.1991
40.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
MayesE. (2019). Reconceptualizing the presence of students on school governance councils: The a/effects of spatial positioning. Policy Futures in Education, 17(4), 503–519.
RochefortD. A.CobbR. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. University Press of Kansas.
51.
SalisburyJ. (2021). Relinquishing power: Creating space for youth of color leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 59, 759–775. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2020-0081
52.
SalisburyJ. D.ShethM. J.AngtonA. (2020). “They didn’t even talk about oppression”: School leadership protecting the whiteness of leadership through resistance practices to a youth voice initiative. Journal of Education Human Resources, 38(1), 57–81.
53.
SawchukS. (2021). Student school board members flex their civic muscle in Supreme Court free-speech case. Education Week, 40(29), 1–4.
54.
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
55.
SpringJ. (2018). The American school: From the Puritans to the Trump Era (10th ed.). Routledge.
56.
TermanL. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon scales. Houghton Mifflin.
57.
ValenciaR. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.
58.
WeltonA.MansfieldK. C. (2020). More than just an academic exercise: Conjoining critical policy analysis and community-engaged research as an embodiment of political action. Educational Studies, 56(6), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2020.1837834
WolcottH. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and interpretation. SAGE Publications, Inc.
61.
YakinB. (2000). Remember the Titans [film]. Buena Vista Pictures.
62.
YanowD. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.
63.
YinR. K. (2006). Case study methods. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111–122). Sage Publications, Inc.
