STEM-Focused Career Courses and College Pipeline for Students with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Recent educational policies in the United States have fostered the growth of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career-focused courses to support high school students’ persistence into these fields in college and beyond. As one key example, federal legislation has embedded new types of “applied STEM” (AS) courses into the career and technical education curriculum (CTE), which can help students persist in STEM through high school and college. Yet, little is known about the link between AS-CTE coursetaking and college STEM persistence for students with learning disabilities (LDs). Using a nationally representative data set, we found no evidence that earning more units of AS-CTE in high school influenced college enrollment patterns or major selection in non-AS STEM fields for students with LDs. That said, students with LDs who earned more units of AS-CTE in high school were more likely to seriously consider and ultimately declare AS-related STEM majors in college.

Keywords

STEM career and technical education education policy students with learning disabilities secondary data analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

(2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf

Alston

R. J.

Bell

T. J.

Hampton

J. L.

(2002). Learning disability and career entry into the sciences: A critical analysis of attitudinal factors. Journal of Career Development, 28(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/089484530202800403

Alston

R. J.

Hampton

J. L.

(2000). Science and engineering as viable career choices for students with disabilities: A survey of parents and teachers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/003435520004300306

Alston

R. J.

Hampton

J. L.

Bell

T. J.

Strauss

(1998). Matriculation of persons with disabilities in science and engineering: Perceptions of rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29(3), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1891/0047-2220.29.3.5

Blackorby

Wagner

(1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299606200502

Bozick

Dalton

(2013). Career and technical education and academic progress at the end of high school: Evidence from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. RTI International. Prepared for the National Assessment of Career and Technical Education (NACTE). Submitted to the U.S. Department of Education, Policy and Program Studies Service. https://www.rti.org/publication/career-and-technical-education-and-academic-progress-end-high-school/fulltext.pdf

Bradby

Hudson

(2008). The 2007 revision of the career/technical education portion of the secondary school taxonomy (No. NCES 2008-030). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008030.pdf

Brand

Valent

Browning

(2013). How career and technical education can help students be college and career ready: A primer. American Institutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555696.pdf

Brigham

F. J.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00343.x

10.

Brody

L. E.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Effects of high school coursework and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 866–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.866

11.

Burkam

D. T.

Lee

V. E.

Smerdon

B. A.

(1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163360

12.

Cortiella

Horowitz

S. H.

(2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging Issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-State-of-LD.pdf

13.

Dexter

D. D.

Park

Y. J.

Hughes

C. A.

(2011). A meta-analytic review of graphic organizers and science instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for the intermediate and secondary science classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00341.x

14.

Dougherty

S. M.

Grindal

Hehir

(2018). The impact of career and technical education on students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 29(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318771673

15.

Eriksson

Welander

Granlund

(2007). Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19(5), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9065-5

16.

Federman

(2007). State graduation requirements, high school course taking, and choosing a technical college major. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1521

17.

Gottfried

M.A.

(2015). The influence of applied STEM coursetaking on advanced math and science coursetaking. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 382–399.

18.

Gottfried

M. A.

Bozick

Srinivasan

S. V.

(2014). Beyond academic math: The role of applied STEM coursetaking in high school. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–35.

19.

Gottfried

M. A.

Bozick

(2016). Supporting the STEM pipeline: Linking applied STEM coursetaking in high school to declaring a STEM major in college. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2), 177–202.

20.

Gottfried

M. A.

Plasman

J. S.

(2018). Linking the timing of career and technical education coursetaking on high school dropout and college-going behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 325–361. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217734805

21.

Gottfried

M. A.

Sublett

(2018). Does applied STEM course taking link to STEM outcomes for high school students with learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(3), 250–267.

22.

Gottfried

M. A.

Plasman

Freeman

J. A.

Dougherty

(2021). Who’s taking what? “Applied STEM” coursetaking for high school students with learning disabilities. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–16.

23.

Goodman-Scott

Sink

C. A.

Cholewa

B. E.

Burgess

(2018). An ecological view of school counselor ratios and student academic outcomes: A national investigation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 96(10), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12221

24.

Heckman

J. J.

Ichimura

Todd

P. E.

(1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.

25.

Heckman

J. J.

Ichimura

Todd

(1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261–294.

26.

Jenson

Petri

Day

Truman

Duffy

(2011). Perceptions of self-efficacy among STEM students with disabilities. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(4), 269–283.

27.

Joyner

Csikszentmihalyi

Schneider

(2002). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. Contemporary Sociology, 31(2), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3089477

28.

Kjaernsli

Lie

(2011). Students’ preference for science careers: International comparisons based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 121–144.

29.

Lamb

Brown

Hodges

Foy

(2004). Building bridges toward science careers for youth with disabilities. Improving Secondary Education and Transition Services through Research, 3(2), 1–5.

30.

Lee

V. E.

Burkam

D. T.

(2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002353

31.

Lee

V. E.

Frank

K. A.

(1990). Students’ characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63(3), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112836

32.

Long

M. C.

Conger

Iatarola

(2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211431952

33.

Maccini

Gagnon

J. C.

(2000). Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v32i5.6919

34.

Milesi

Perez-Felkner

Brown

Schneider

(2017). Engagement, persistence, and gender in computer science: Results of a smartphone ESM study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–9.

35.

Moon

N. W.

Todd

R. L.

Morton

D. L.

Ivey

(2012). Accommodating students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology.

36.

National Science Foundation. (2002). NSF’s program for persons with disabilities: A decade of innovation and progress.

37.

National Science Foundation. (2015). Employed scientists and engineers, by occupation, highest degree level, and disability status, 9–10. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/data/tab9-8.pdf

38.

NCES. (2016). Children and youth with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/Indicator_CGG/coe_cgg_2016_05.pdf

39.

Parmar

R. S.

Deluca

C. B.

Janczak

T. M.

(1994). Investigations into the relationship between science and language abilities of students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259401500207

40.

Plank

S. B.

DeLuca

Estacion

(2008). High school dropout and the role of career and technical education: A survival analysis of surviving high school. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100402

41.

Plasman

J. S.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2018). Applied STEM coursework, high school dropout rates, and students with learning disabilities. Educational Policy, 32(5), 664–696.

42.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2013). Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12001

43.

Riddick

(2000). An examination of the relationship between labelling and stigmatization with special reference to dyslexia. Disability & Society, 15(4), 653–667.

44.

Riegle-Crumb

(2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 101–122.

45.

Royston

(2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.

46.

Rule

A. C.

Stefanich

G. P.

Haselhuhn

C. W.

Peiffer

(2009). A working conference on students with disabilities in STEM coursework and careers. Online Submission. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505568

47.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1) 33–38.

48.

Schneider

Swanson

Riegle-Crumb

(1997). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 2(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009601517753

49.

Scruggs

T. E.

Brigham

F. J.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2013). Common core science standards: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12002

50.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(1993). Current approaches to science education: Implications for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259301400104

51.

Shifrer

Callahan

(2010). Technology and communications coursework: Facilitating the progression of students with learning disabilities through high school science and math coursework. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 65–77.

52.

Shifrer

Callahan

R. M.

Muller

(2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682.

53.

Smith

J. A.

Todd

P. E.

(2005). Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353.

54.

Spellings

Justesen

T. R.

Knudsen

W. W.

(2006). 28th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 1, 1–306. http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2006/parts-b-c/28th-vol-1.pdf

55.

Steele

M. M.

(2010). High school students with learning disabilities: Mathematics instruction, study skills, and high stakes tests. American Secondary Education, 38(3), 21–28.

56.

Stone

J. R.

Alfeld

Pearson

(2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767–795. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208317460

57.

Stone

J. R.

Lewis

M. V.

(2012). College and career ready in the 21st century: Making high school matter. Teachers College Press.

58.

Sublett

Plasman

J. S.

(2017). How does applied STEM coursework relate to mathematics and science self-efficacy among high school students? Evidence from a national sample. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 32(1), 29–50.

59.

Therrien

W. J.

Taylor

J. C.

Hosp

J. L.

Kaldenberg

E. R.

Gorsh

(2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00340.x

60.

Theobald

Plasman

J. S.

Gottfried

Gratz

Holden

Goldhaber

(in press). Sometimes less, sometimes more: Trends in career and technical education participation for students with disabilities. Educational Researcher.

61.

Trusty

(2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(4), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00213.x

62.

Vaughn

Linan-Thompson

(2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 140–147.

63.

Villanueva

M. G.

Hand

(2011). Science for all: Engaging students with special needs in and about science. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00344.x

64.

Wang

(2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622

65.

Wimberly

G. L.

Noeth

R. J.

(2005). College readiness begins in middle school (ACT policy report). American College Testing ACT Inc.

66.

Witzel

B. S.

(2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 49–60.