The United States is rare among nations in its highly decentralized process for negotiating collective bargaining agreements with local teachers’ unions. To determine whether partisanship can predict these highly localized decisions, I construct an original database of Pennsylvania collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) merged with publicly available voter registration records to predict the presence of high-profile contract items. Using spatial autoregression and probit regression, I reveal that the partisanship of a school district is a significant predictor for fewer seniority protections but not for lower salaries. These partisan relationships can guide both district administrators and union leaders in future negotiations.
AllenA.PlankD. N. (2005). School board election structure and democratic representation. Educational Policy, 19(3), 510–527.
2.
AnziaS. F.MoeT. M. (2016). Do politicians use policy to make politics? The case of public-sector labor laws. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 763–777.
3.
BabcockL.EngbergJ.GreenbaumR. (2005). Wage spillovers in public sector contract negotiations: The importance of social comparisons. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(4), 395–416.
4.
BartanenB.GrissomJ. A.JoshiE.MeredithM. (2018). Mapping inequalities in local political representation: Evidence from Ohio school boards. AERA Open, 4(4): 1–19.
5.
BiasiB. (2018). The labor market for teachers under different pay schemes (No. w24813). National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BiasiB.SarsonsH. (2020). Flexible wages, bargaining, and the gender gap (No. w27894). National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BlancE. (2019). Red state revolt: The teachers’ strike wave and working-class politics. Verso Books.
8.
BleibergJ.HarbatkinE. (2020). Teacher evaluation reform: A convergence of federal and local forces. Educational Policy, 34(6), 918–952.
9.
BrasingtonD.Flores-LagunesA.GuciL. (2016). A spatial model of school district open enrollment choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 56, 1–18.
10.
BrunnerE.HymanJ.JuA. (2019). School finance reforms, teachers’ unions, and the allocation of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 473–489.
11.
ChengA.HendersonM. B.PetersonP. E.WestM. R. (2018). Public support climbs for teacher pay, school expenditures, charter schools, and universal vouchers. Education Next, 19(1), 1–26.
12.
CohenD. K.SpillaneJ. P.PeurachD. P. (2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212.
13.
ConawayC. (2020). Maximizing research use in the world we actually live in: Relationships, organizations, and interpretation. Education Finance and Policy, 15(1), 1–10.
14.
CowenJ. W.FowlesJ. (2013). Same contract, different day? An analysis of teacher bargaining agreements in Louisville since 1979. Teachers College Record, 113, 1–30.
15.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13.
16.
DrukkerD. M.PruchaI. R.RaciborskiR. (2013). Maximum likelihood and generalized spatial two-stage least-squares estimators for a spatial-autoregressive model with spatial- autoregressive disturbances. The Stata Journal, 13(2), 221–241.
17.
EdgertonA. K.DesimoneL. M. (2018). Teacher implementation of college- and career- readiness standards: Links among policy, instruction, challenges, and resources. AERA Open, 4(5), 1–22.
18.
EdgertonA. K. (2020). Learning from standards deviations: Three dimensions for building education policies that last. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1525–1566
19.
FingerL. K. (2017). Vested interests and the diffusion of education policy reform across the states. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 378–401.
20.
FiorinaM. P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro- analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 426–443.
21.
FlavinP.HartneyM. T. (2015). When government subsidizes its own: Collective bargaining laws as agents of political mobilization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 896–911.
22.
FlavinP. (2016). Labor union strength and the equality of political representation. British Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 1075–1091.
23.
GadarianK. S.GoodmanS. W.PepinskyT. B. (2020). Partisanship, health, behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3562796
24.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR.D’EntremontD.FangY. (2013). Teacher collective bargaining: Assessing the internal validity of partial independence item response measures of contract restrictiveness. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–13.
25.
González CanchéM. S. (2018). Spatial econometrics and network analysis as means to assess the assumption of independence in higher education research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2018(180), 11–38.
26.
GrissomJ. A. (2010). The determinants of conflict on governing boards in public organizations: The case of California school boards. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 601–627.
27.
HanE. S.KeefeJ. (2020). Teachers’ unions: Engaging teachers and improving student achievement in states that prohibit collective bargaining. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820901476
28.
HanushekE. A.LuqueJ. (2000). Smaller classes, lower salaries? The effects of class size on teacher labor markets. In LaineS. W.WardsJ. G. (Eds.), Using what we know: A review of the research on implementing class-size reduction initiatives for state and local policymakers (pp. 35–51). North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 35051.
29.
HartneyM. T.FingerL. K. (2020). Politics, markets, and pandemics: Public education’s response to COVID-19. (EdWorkingPaper: 20-304). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/8ff8-3945
30.
HendersonM. B.HoustonD.PetersonP. E.ShakeelM. D.WestM. R. (2020). Amid pandemic, support soars for online learning, parent poll shows. Education Next, 20(3), 089590482090147.
31.
IngleW. K.WismanR. A. (2018). Extending the work of Cowen and Fowles: A historical analysis of Kentucky teacher contracts. Educational Policy, 32(2), 313–333.
32.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1 466, 513 U.S. (2018).
33.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
34.
KirstM. W.WirtF. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). McCutchan Pub Corp.
35.
KraftM.A. (2015). Teacher layoffs, teacher quality and student achievement: Evidence from a discretionary layoff policy. Education Finance and Policy, 11(4): 1–41.
36.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.
37.
LovenheimM. F. (2009). The effect of teachers’ unions on education production: Evidence from union election certifications in three midwestern states. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 525–587.
38.
LovenheimM.WillénA. (2019). The long-run effects of teacher collective bargaining. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(3), 292–324.
39.
MariannoB. D.KilbrideT.TheobaldR.StrunkK. O.CowenJ. M.GoldhaberD. (2017). Cut from the same cloth? Comparing urban district CBAs within states and across the United States. Educational Policy, 32(3), 334–359.
40.
MariannoB. D.StrunkK. (2018). The bad end of the bargain?: Revisiting the relationship between collective bargaining agreements and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 65, 93–106.
MoeT. M. (2015). Vested interests and political institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 130(2), 277–318.
43.
MoeT. M. (2017). Teachers’ unions in the United States. In MoeT. M.WiborgS. (Eds,), The comparative politics of education: Teachers’ unions and education systems around the world (pp. 22–55). Cambridge University Press.
44.
MoeT. M.WiborgS. (2017). Introduction. In MoeT. M.WiborgS. (Eds.), The comparative politics of education: Teachers’ unions and education systems around the world (pp. 1–21). Cambridge University Press.
45.
National Education Association (2016). Rankings of the states 2016 and estimates of school statistics 2017. NEA Research.
PapayJ. P.KraftM. A. (2016). The myth of the performance plateau. Educational Leadership, 73(8), 36–42.
48.
Pennsylvania Department of State (2018). PA full voter export.
49.
Pennsylvania State Education Association (2018). Collective bargaining.
50.
PetersonP. E.HendersonM. B.WestM. R. (2014). Teachers versus the public: What Americans think about their schools and how to fix them. Brookings Institution Press.
RinckeJ. (2006). Competition in the public school sector: Evidence on strategic interaction among US school districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 352–369.
53.
SteinbergM. P.QuinnR. (2015). A tale of two decades: New evidence on adequacy and equity in Pennsylvania. Journal of Education Finance, 40(3), 273–299.
54.
SteinbergM. P.KraftM. A. (2017). The sensitivity of teacher performance ratings to the design of teacher evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 378–396.
55.
StecherB. M.HoltzmanD. J.GaretM. S.HamiltonL. S.EngbergJ.SteinerE. D.RobynA.BairdM. D.GutierrezI. A.PeetE. D.de los ReyesI. B.FronbergK.WeinbergerG.HunterG. P.ChambersJ. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report: The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. RR- 2242-BMGF. RAND Corporation.
56.
ShoresK.SteinbergM. P. (2019). Schooling during the great recession: Patterns of school spending and student achievement using population data. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–29.
57.
StrunkK. O.GrissomJ. A. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 389–406.
58.
StrunkK. O.ReardonS. F. (2010). Measuring the strength of teachers’ unions: An empirical application of the partial independence item response approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(6), 629–670.
59.
StrunkK. O.McEachinA. (2011). Accountability under constraint: The relationship between collective bargaining agreements and California schools’ and districts’ performance under No Child Left Behind. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 871–903.
60.
StrunkK. O.CowenJ. M.GoldhaberD.MariannoB. D.KilbrideT.TheobaldR. (2018a). It is in the contract: How the policies set in teachers’ unions’ collective bargaining agreements vary across states and districts. Educational Policy, 32(2), 280–312.
61.
StrunkK. O.CowenJ.GoldhaberD.MariannoB. D.KilbrideT.TheobaldR. (2018b). Collective bargaining and state-level reforms: Assessing changes to the restrictiveness of collective bargaining agreements across three states (No. 210-1218). CALDER Working Paper.
62.
SwainW. A.ReddingC. (2019). Teachers’ union power in a budget crunch: Lasting ramifications of Differential spending responses to the Great Recession. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819881161
63.
SwainW. A.RodriguezL. A.SpringerM. G. (2019). Selective retention bonuses for highly effective teachers in high poverty schools: Evidence from Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 68, 148–160.
64.
SupovitzJ. (2017). Social media is the new player in the politics of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(3), 50–55.
65.
TaylorL. L. (2006). Comparable wages, inflation, and school finance equity. Education Finance and Policy, 1(3), 349–371.
66.
TetlockP. E.VieiderF. M.PatilS. V.GrantA. M. (2013). Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(1), 22–35.
WhiteR. S. (2018). Who do state policy makers listen to? The case of teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(8), 13–18.
69.
WinterJ. V. (2011). Teacher salaries and teachers unions: A spatial econometric approach. IRL Review, 64(4), 747–764.
70.
WolbrechtC.HartneyM. T. (2014). “ Ideas about Interests”: Explaining the changing partisan politics of education,. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3): 603–630.
71.
WrabelS. L.SaultzA.PolikoffM. S.McEachinA.DuqueM. (2018). The politics of elementary and secondary education act waivers. Educational Policy, 32(1), 117–140.
72.
ZwerlingH. L. (2008). Pennsylvania teachers strikes and academic performance. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 32(2), 151–172.
