A Collaborative Problem-Solving Approach to Improving District Attendance Policy

Abstract

Collaborative problem-solving research approaches have the potential to support improvement in educational policy and practice beyond instruction, by facilitating the development of a shared understanding of complex problems and creating social structures where district, community, and research partners can work together to solve them. This study investigates how findings from a developmental evaluation of a district attendance initiative were incorporated into the initiation process of a networked improvement community to create a shared narrative about how members conceptualized the problem of absenteeism and how they should adapt their levers to better align to that problem. The developmental learning process created an infrastructure within which district leaders and community partners could develop a partnership culture that facilitated change in policy. This study suggests the need to revisit the assumptions that have driven non-instructional improvement efforts and highlights the potential of collaborative problem-solving to strengthen the implementation of district reforms.

Keywords

absenteeism developmental evaluation research use implementation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

E. M.

Evans

(2016). Tackling absenteeism in Chicago. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716671900

Allensworth

E. M.

Easton

J. Q.

(2007). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools: A close look at course grades, failures, and attendance in the freshman year. UChicago Consortium on School Research.

Anderson

K. P.

(2019). Academic, attendance, and behavioral outcomes of a suspension reduction policy: Lessons for school leaders and policy makers. Educational Administration Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19861138

Anyon

(2005). What “counts” as educational policy? Notes toward a new paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.1.g1q5k721220ku176

Balfanz

Byrnes

(2013). Meeting the challenge of combating chronic absenteeism: Impact of the NYC Mayor’s Interagency Task Force on chronic absenteeism and school attendance and its implications for other cities. Johns Hopkins School of Education. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544570

Bevan

(2017). Research and practice: One way, two way, no way, or new way? Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12204

Boeije

(2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.

Booher-Jennings

(2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002231

Booker

Conaway

Schwartz

(2019). Five ways RPPs can fail and how to avoid them: Applying conceptual frameworks to improve RPPs. William T. Grant Foundation. http://wtgrantfoundation.org/five-ways-rpps-can-fail-and-how-to-avoid-them-applying-conceptual-frameworks-to-improve-rpps

10.

Bridwell-Mitchell

E. N.

Sherer

D. G.

(2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567

11.

Bryk

A. S.

Gomez

L. M.

Grunow

LeMahieu

P. G.

(2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

12.

Byrd

(2019). Uncovering hegemony in higher education: A critical appraisal of the use of “institutional habitus” in empirical scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 171–210. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318812915

13.

Cannata

Cohen-Vogel

Sorum

(2017). Partnering for improvement: Improvement communities and their role in scale up. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633

14.

Chang

Balfanz

(2016). Preventing missed opportunity: Taking collective action to confront chronic absence. Attendance Works and Everyone Graduates Center. http://new.every1graduates.org/preventing-missed-opportunity-taking-collective-action-to-confront-chronic-absence/

15.

Chang

Jordan

P. W.

(2011). Tackling chronic absence starting in the early grades: What cities can do to ensure every child has a fighting chance to succeed. National Civic Review, 100(4), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.20078

16.

Chang

Jordan

P.W.

(2013). Building a culture of attendance: Schools and afterschool programs together can and should make a difference. In Peterson

T. K.

(Ed.), Expanding minds and opportunities: Leveraging the power of afterschool and summer learning for student success (pp. 56–61). Collaborative Communications Group.

17.

Chang

H. N.

Romero

(2008). Present, engaged, and accounted for: The critical importance of addressing chronic absence in the early grades. National Center for Children in Poverty. http://www.nccp.org/publications/pub_837.html

18.

Childs

Grooms

A. A.

(2018). Improving school attendance through collaboration: A catalyst for community involvement and change. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 23(1–2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2018.1439751

19.

Chingos

Blagg

(2017). Student transportation and educational access: How students get to school in Denver, Detroit, New Orleans, New York City, and Washington, DC. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/student-transportation-and-educational-access/view/full_report

20.

Civil Rights Data Collection. (2016). Office of Civil Rights. Civil Rights Data Collection. http://ocrdata.ed.gov/

21.

Coburn

C. E.

(2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145

22.

Cohen

D. K.

Spillane

J. P.

(1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18, 3–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167296

23.

Cohen

W. M.

Levinthal

D. A.

(1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

24.

Cowen

Edwards

D. S.

Sattin-Bajaj

Cosby

(2018). Motor City miles: Student travel to schools in and around Detroit. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/motor-city-miles-student-travel-schools-and-around-detroit

25.

Dozois

Langlois

Blanchet-Cohen

(2010). A practitioner’s guide to developmental evaluation. The JW McConnell Family Foundation. https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DE-201-EN.pdf

26.

Edwards

A. R.

Sandoval

McNamara

(2015). Designing for improvement in professional development for community college developmental mathematics faculty. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(5), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115602313

27.

Edwards

D. S.

Anderson

K. P.

Mohr

(2019). Transportation, choice and parental priorities: An analysis of Detroit’s GOAL Line program. Education Policy Innovation Collaborative. https://epicedpolicy.org/transportation-choice-and-parental-priorities-an-analysis-of-detroits-goal-line-program/

28.

Ehrlich

S. B.

Johnson

D. W.

(2019). Reinforcing student attendance: Shifting mindsets and implementing data-driven improvement strategies during school transitions. In Gottfried

M. A.

Hutt

E. L.

(Eds.), Absent from school: Understanding and addressing student absenteeism (pp. 83–99). Harvard Education Press.

29.

Ellison

(2014). Attack of the cyborgs: Economic imperialism and the human deficit in educational policy-making & research. Journal of Educational Controversy, 8(1), 1–15.

30.

Elmore

(1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33

31.

Farrell

C. C.

Coburn

C. E.

Chong

(2019). Under what conditions do school districts learn from external partners? The role of absorptive capacity. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 955–994. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218808219

32.

Gee

K. A.

(2018). Minding the gaps in absenteeism: Disparities in absenteeism by race/ethnicity, poverty and disability. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 23(1–2), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2018.1428610

33.

Gershenson

Jacknowitz

Brannegan

(2017). Are student absences worth the worry in US primary schools? Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00207

34.

Gewirtz

(2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. Routledge.

35.

Glazer

J. L.

Peurach

D. J.

(2015). Occupational control in education: The logic and leverage of epistemic communities. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 172–202. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.172

36.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2014). Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.962696

37.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2017). Linking getting to school with going to school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717699472

38.

Gottfried

M. A.

Gee

K. A.

(2017). Identifying the determinants of chronic absenteeism: A bioecological systems approach. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–34.

39.

Graves

Weisburd

Salem

(2019). The ills of absenteeism: Can school-based health centers provide the cure? In Gottfried

M. A.

Hutt

E. L.

(Eds.), Absent from school: Understanding and addressing student absenteeism (pp. 137–148). Harvard Education Press.

40.

Hannan

Russell

J. L.

Takahashi

Park

(2015). Using improvement science to better support beginning teachers: The case of the Building a Teaching Effectiveness Network. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(5), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115602126

41.

Henrick

Cobb

Penuel

W. R.

Jackson

Clark

(2017). Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation. https://rpp.wtgrantfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Assessing-Research-Practice-Partnerships.pdf

42.

Hirsch

Lounsbury

(2015). Towards a more critical and “powerful” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614545297

43.

Hutt

E. L.

(2018). Measuring missed school: The historical precedents for the measurement and use of attendance records to evaluate schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 23(1–2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2018.1438899

44.

ICF International. (2010). Communities in Schools national evaluation: Randomized controlled trial study Austin, Texas (Vol. 2). ICF International. https://www.communitiesinschools.org/our-data/publications/publication/randomized-controlled-trial-volume-5

45.

Jacob

Lovett

(2017). Chronic absenteeism: An old problem in search of new answers. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/chronic-absenteeism-an-old-problem-in-search-of-new-answers/

46.

Johnston

W. R.

Engberg

Opper

I. M.

Sontag-Padilla

Xenakis

(2020). Illustrating the promise of Community Schools: An assessment of the impact of the New York City Community Schools initiative. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3245.html

47.

Jordan

P. W.

Miller

(2017). Who’s in: Chronic absenteeism under the Every Student Succeeds Act. FutureEd. https://www.future-ed.org/whos-in-chronic-absenteeism-under-the-every-student-succeeds-act/

48.

Kemple

J. J.

Herlihy

C. M.

Smith

T. J.

(2005). Making progress toward graduation: Evidence from the talent development high school model. MDRC. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/making-progress-toward-graduation

49.

Kostyo

Cardichon

Darling-Hammond

(2018). Making ESSA’s equity promise real: State strategies to close the opportunity gap. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/essa-equity-promise

50.

Langlois

Blanchet-Cohen

Beer

(2012). The art of the nudge: Five practices for developmental evaluators. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 27(2), 39–59.

51.

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2019, April 5-9). Improving attendance through collective learning among schools, communities, and families [Roundtable]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.

52.

Lenhoff

S. W.

Pogodzinski

Singer

Cook

(2019). Student exit, mobility, and attendance in Detroit. Detroit Education Research Partnership. https://education.wayne.edu/detroit-education-research-partnership

53.

Lipsky

(1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100600401

54.

Lipsky

(1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

55.

Liu

Loeb

(2019). Engaging teachers: Measuring the impact of teachers on student attendance in secondary school. Journal of Human Resources, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.56.2.1216-8430R3

56.

London

R. A.

Sanchez

Castrechini

(2016). The dynamics of chronic absence and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 112. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2471

57.

López Turley

R. N.

Stevens

. (2015). Lessons from a school district–university research partnership: The Houston Education Research Consortium. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1_suppl), 6S–15S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715576074

58.

Lupton

Hayes

(2018). Think tanks and the pedagogical dispositions and strategies of socially critical researchers: A case study of inequalities in schooling. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317745968

59.

Mertens

D. M.

(1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409902000102

60.

Meyer

H-D

Rowan

(2006). The new institutionalism in education. State University of New York Press.

61.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

62.

Michigan Department of Education. (2017). Michigan’s approved ESSA plan. Michigan Department of Education.

63.

Oakes

Maier

Daniel

(2017). Community Schools: An evidence-based strategy for equitable school improvement. National Education Policy Center. https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/equitable-community-schools

64.

Penuel

W. R.

(2019). Co-design as infrastructuring with attention to power: Building collective capacity for equitable teaching and learning through design-based implementation research. In Pieters

Voogt

Pareja Roblin

(Eds.), Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning (pp. 387–401). Springer.

65.

Penuel

W. R.

Allen

A.-R.

Coburn

C. E.

Farrell

(2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334

66.

Penuel

W. R.

Farrell

C. C.

Allen

A.-R.

Toyama

Coburn

C. E.

(2018). What research district leaders find useful. Educational Policy, 32(4), 540–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816673580

67.

Penuel

W. R.

Peurach

D. J.

LeBoeuf

W. A.

Riedy

Barber

Clark

Gabriele

(2017). Defining collaborative problem solving research: Common values and distinctive approaches. Design Based Implementation Research. http://learndbir.org/talks-and-papers/defining-collaborative-problem-solving-research-common-values-and-distinctive-approaches-2018

68.

Penuel

W. R.

Riedy

Barber

M. S.

Peurach

D. J.

LeBouef

W. A.

Clark

(2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126

69.

Peurach

D. J.

Glazer

J. L.

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2016). The developmental evaluation of school improvement networks. Educational Policy, 30(4), 606–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814557592

70.

Peurach

D. J.

Lenhoff

S. W.

Glazer

J. L.

(2016). Large-scale high school reform through school improvement networks: Exploring possibilities for “developmental evaluation.” Teachers College Record, 118(13), 1–28. http://www.tcrecord.org/library/abstract.asp?contentid=20622

71.

Polikoff

Conaway

(2018, September 25). Getting beyond “did it work?”: Proposing a new approach to integrate research and policy. Brown Center Chalkboard. www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2018/09/25/getting-beyond-did-it-work-proposing-a-new-approach-to-integrate-research-and-policy/

72.

Redding

Cannata

Taylor Haynes

(2017). With scale in mind: A continuous improvement model for implementation. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368635

73.

Revised School Code, Michigan Stat. §§380.1147 (1976). Compulsory school attendance: Attendance policies and grades. Michigan Department of Education. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/compulsory_attendance_257944_7.pdf

74.

Rogers

Feller

(2018). Reducing student absences at scale by targeting parents’ misbeliefs. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0328-1

75.

Rumberger

R. W.

Addis

Allensworth

Balfanz

Bruch

Dillon

Tuttle

C. C.

(2017). Preventing dropout in secondary schools (No. NCEE 2017-4028). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, US. Department of Education. https://whatworks.ed.gov

76.

Russell

J. L.

Bryk

A. S.

Dolle

Gomez

L. M.

LeMahieu

Grunow

(2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–36.

77.

Saldaña

(2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

78.

Sattin-Bajaj. (2018). It’s hard to separate choice from transportation. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/its-hard-separate-choice-transportation/view/full_report

79.

Singer

Pogodzinski

Lenhoff

S. W.

Cook

(in press). Advancing an ecological approach to chronic absenteeism: Evidence from Detroit. Teachers College Record.

80.

Slee

Weiner

Tomlinson

(1998) School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements. RoutledgeFalmer.

81.

Smythe-Leistico

Page

L. C.

(2018). Connect-Text: Leveraging text-message communication to mitigate chronic absenteeism and improve parental engagement in the earliest years of schooling. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 23(1–2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2018.1434658

82.

Spillane

J. P.

(2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University Press.

83.

Spillane

J. P.

Zeuli

J. S.

(1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737021001001

84.

State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Bridges eligibility manual: School attendance and student status. Department of Health & Human Services. https://dhhs.michigan.gov/OLMWEB/EX/BP/Public/BEM/245.pdf

85.

Sugai

Horner

R. H.

(2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375

86.

Thompson

(2019, August 20). Warren calls for repealing 1994 crime bill, decriminalizing school truancy. POLITICO. https://politi.co/2P7U6Qe

87.

Thompson

K. D.

Martinez

M. I.

Clinton

Díaz

(2017). Considering interest and action: Analyzing types of questions explored by researcher-practitioner partnerships. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17733965

88.

Thornton

P. H.

Ocasio

(2008). Institutional logics. In Greenwood

Oliver

Suddaby

Sahlin

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4

89.

U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Accountability under Title I, Part A of the ESEA: Frequently asked questions. US Department of Education

90.

Weick

K. E.

(1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(11), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875