Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Over the past several decades, neoliberal reformers have had immense success advancing their reforms. While studies have pointed to the negative impact of these reforms on students and literacy instruction, there has been limited work focused on the well-being of teachers and the impact these reforms have on growing teacher shortages, especially in rural schools serving growing numbers of bilingual learners. Drawing on data collected from five rural schools during the implementation in New Mexico of what was dubbed the “toughest teacher evaluation system” in the U.S., this article explores how the evaluation system threatened teacher professional autonomy and career satisfaction, leading to teacher shortages that mirror a nationwide trend in the U.S. While existing work has largely taken a resigned stance towards the continual march of neoliberal education reform, this article closes by emphasizing the agency of individuals and organizations to enact change.

Keywords

neoliberal reform teacher evaluation high-stakes assessment secondary education English language learners

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amrein-Beardsley

(2018). New Mexico’s motion for summary judgment, following Houston’s precedent-setting ruling. VAMboozled. http://vamboozled.com/author/audrey-amrein-beardsley/

Apple

M. W.

(2001). Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052003002

Arnold

M. L.

Newman

J. H.

Gaddy

B. B.

Dean

C. B.

(2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a difference for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6). http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-6.pdf

(2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523

(2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815614916

Ball

S. J.

(2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Ball

S. J.

Olmedo

(2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.740678

Ballou

Springer

M. G.

(2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problems in the design and implementation of evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574904

Boyd

(2018). Teacher evaluations likely to be overhauled. Albuquerque Journal.

10.

Brown

(2015). Philanthrocapitalism: Race, political spectacle and the marketplace of beneficence in a New York City school. In Picower

Mayorga

(Eds.), What’s race got to do with it: How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality (pp. 147–166). Peter Lang.

11.

Burgess

(2017). Expert: NM teacher evals are toughest in the nation. Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/1029370/expert-nm-teacher-evals-toughest-in-us.html

12.

Callahan

R. M.

(2006). The intersection of accountability and language: Can reading intervention replace english language development? Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2006.10162863

13.

de Cohen

C. C.

Clewell

B. C

. (2007). Putting english language learners on the educational map. The Urban Institute.

14.

Department of Education (2009). President Obama, U.S. Secretary of Education Duncan announce national competition to advance school reform. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/president-obama-us-secretary-education-duncan-announce-national-competition-adva

15.

Department of Education (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform: a report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, D.C.

16.

Edstam

Walker

Stone

. (2007). Educating english language learners in a rural district: A case in point. Minnesota and Wisconsin Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. The University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://purl.umn.edu/109976

17.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

18.

Foucault

(1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.

19.

Foucault

(1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984 (Vol. 1). The New Press.

20.

Friedman

(1962). Capitalism and freedom. The University of Chicago Press.

21.

Garcia

U. J.

(2017). Changes to teacher evaluations allows six sick days, lessens weight of student scores. The Santa Few New Mexican.

22.

Grisham

M. L.

(2019). Executive Order 2019-001. Office of the Governor. https://www.governor.state.nm.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/EO_2019-001.pdf

23.

Gilliland

(2017). Opportunity gaps: Curricular discontinuities across ESL, mainstream, and college English. In Ortmeier-Hooper

Ruecker

(Eds.), Linguistically diverse immigrant and resident writers: Transitions from high school to college (pp. 21–35). Routledge.

24.

Grissom

J. A.

Nicholson-Crotty

Harrington

J. R.

(2014). Estimating the effects of no child left behind on teachers’ work environments and job attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714533817

25.

Hanushek

(1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 280–288.

26.

Holloway

Brass

(2017). Making accountable teachers: the terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636

27.

Hursh

(2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306764

28.

Koedel

Springer

M. G.

Tan

(2017). The impact of performance ratings on job satisfaction for public school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 241–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216687531

29.

Lara-Alecio

Galloway

Irby

B. J.

Brown

(2004). An analysis of Texas superintendents’ bilingual/ESL teacher recruitment and retention practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA

30.

Maguire

Braun

Ball

(2018). Discomforts, opposition and resistance in schools: The perspectives of union representatives. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(7), 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1443431

31.

McCarthey

S. J.

(2008). The impact of no child left behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25(4), 462–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308322554

32.

McCoy

(2016). New Mexico public education department agrees to end testing gag rule. ACLU New Mexico. https://www.aclu-nm.org/en/news/new-mexico-public-education-department-agrees-end-testing-gag-rule

33.

Mckay

Perea

(2018). New Mexico loses education lawsuit. Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/1199185/nm-loses-landmark-education-case-ordered-to-provide-adequate-funding.html

34.

Menken

Solorza

(2014). No child left bilingual: Accountability and the elimination of bilingual education programs in New York City schools. Educational Policy, 28(1), 96–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812468228

35.

Monk

D. H.

(2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. The Future of Children, 17(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2007.0009

36.

PED (2017a). New Mexico rising. https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/stateplan17/nmcsa2017.pdf

37.

PED (2017b). Serving english learners. https://webnew.ped.state.nm.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/LCB_Serving-ELs_TA_Manual_2017_Rev_2.1.19.pdf

38.

PED (2018). NMTEACH. https://webnew.ped.state.nm.us/bureaus/educator-growth-development/nmteach/

39.

PED (n.d.). A-F school grading. https://aae.ped.state.nm.us/SchoolGradingLinks/1516/TECHNICAL%20ASSISTANCE%20FOR%20EDUCATORS/School%20Grading%20FAQs.pdf

40.

Outreach Alliance Research Lab (2017). 2017 New Mexico educator vacancy report. NMSU. https://alliance.nmsu.edu/files/2017/11/2017-Educator-Vacancy-Report-Final.pdf

41.

Perea

(2018). Large number of New Mexico teacher vacancies called a ‘crisis.’ Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/1241697/new-mexico-teacher-vacancies-called-a-crisis.html

42.

Perryman

Maguire

Braun

Ball

(2018). Surveillance, Governmentality and moving the goalposts: The influence of Ofsted on the work of schools in a post-panoptic era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1372560

43.

Perryman

(2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500138

44.

Reininger

(2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420864

45.

Ruecker

(2015). Transiciones: Pathways of Latinas and Latinos writing in high school and college. Utah State University Press.

46.

Ruecker

Chamcharatsri

Saengngoen

(2015). Teacher perceptions of the impact of the Common Core assessments on linguistically diverse high school students. Journal of Writing Assessment, 8(1). http://journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=87

47.

Schirato

Danaher

Jen

W. E. B. B

. (2012). Understanding Foucault: A critical introduction. Allen & Unwin.

48.

Showalter

Klein

Johnson

Hartman

S. L.

(2017). Why rural matters 2015-2016. Rural School and Community Trust.

49.

Smith

J. M.

Kovacs

P. E.

(2011). The impact of standards-based reform on teachers: the case of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.539802

50.

Stecher

B. M.

Holtzman

D. J.

Garet

M. S.

Hamilton

L. S.

Engberg

Steiner

E. D.

… Robyn

(2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report. RAND Corporation.

51.

Swedien

(2015). PARCC protests hit APS. Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/548407/new-mexico-students-planning-walkouts-over-new-tests.html

52.

Ultican

(2018). TNTP making big bucks from the destroy public education (DPE) movement. Tultican. https://tultican.com/2018/01/13/tntp-making-big-bucks-from-the-destroy-public-education-dpe-movement/

53.

Weisberg

Sexton

Mulhern

Keeling

(2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. New Teacher Project.

54.

Wilcox

K. C.

Lawson

H. A.

(2018). Teachers’ agency, efficacy, engagement, and emotional resilience during policy innovation implementation. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9313-0

55.

Wilkins

Wood

(2009). Initial teacher education in the panopticon. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470903092821

The Impact of Neoliberal Evaluation Systems on Rural Schools,Teachers,and their Bilingual Learners

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References