Many countries have launched national educational technology policies in the past number of decades aimed at increasing technology integration in schools. This article analyses educational technology policy in Ireland from 1997 to 2017 and draws attention to an underlying economic agenda for technology integration in schools, set against a backdrop of neoliberal discourses. The study found that the challenge of integrating technology is no longer understood as simply a challenge of “integration” but rather as a realignment of the existing education system toward a more student-centered experience. Most recent policy also recognizes the complex and contextually bound nature of the associated change process suggesting a maturation of understanding in respect of the intersection between technology and education. The article also highlights the symbolic function of policy and the role it plays in representing the educational system in a particular light to national and international audiences. Recognizing the symbolic function of educational technology policy and the neoliberal ideology underpinning it can help identify the reasons for the apparent failures of past attempts to integrate technology in schools as well as informing future policy iterations.
AustinR.HunterB. (2013). ICT Policy and Implementation in Education: Cases in Canada, Northern Ireland and Ireland. European Journal of Education, 48, 178-192.
2.
BallS. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociologyLondon, England: Routledge.
3.
BallS. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34, 119-130.
4.
BallS. J. (2013, March26). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Vere Foster Trust and the Institute of Educational Research in Ireland Public Lecture, National Gallery, Dublin, Ireland.
5.
BrooksC. (2011). Locating leadership: The blind spot in Alberta’s technology policy discourse. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(26). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/910
6.
ConsidineM. (1994). Public policy: A critical approach. Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan.
7.
CornblethC. (1990). Curriculum in context. London, England: Falmer Press.
8.
CubanL. (2001). Oversold and underused. Harvard University Press.
9.
CulpK. M.HoneyM.MandinachE. (2005). A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279–307. doi:10.2190/7W71-QVT2-PAP2-UDX7
10.
Department of Education and Science. (1997). Schools IT2000—A policy framework for the new millennium. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
11.
Department of Education and Science. (2000). Blueprint for the future of ICT in Irish education: Three year strategic action plan 2000-2003. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
12.
Department of Education and Science. (2008a). Investing effectively in information and communication technologies in schools 2008-2013—The report of the minister’s strategy group. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
Department of Education and Science. (2009). Smart schools = Smart economy: Report of the ICT in schools joint advisory group to the minister for education and science. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
15.
Department of Education and Science. (2015). Digital strategy for schools 2015-2020: Enhancing teaching, learning and assessment. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
16.
Department of Education and Science. (2017). Digital strategy for schools: Action plan 2015-2020. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
17.
HallP. M.McGintyP. J. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Producing program from statute. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 439-467.
18.
HammondM. (2014). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 191-201. doi:10.1111/bjet.12033
19.
HennessyJ.McNamaraP. M. (2011). Packaging poetry? Pupils’ perspectives of their learning experience within the post-primary poetry classroom. English in Education, 45, 206-223.
20.
HillD. (2004). Books, banks and bullets: Controlling our minds—The global project of imperialistic and militaristic neo-liberalism and its effect on education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 2, 504-522.
21.
HillD. (2007). Critical teacher education, new labour, and the global project of neoliberal capital. Policy Futures in Education, 5, 204-225.
22.
HogwoodB.GunnL. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
KompfM. (2005). Information and communications technology (ICT) and the seduction of knowledge, teaching, and learning: What lies ahead for education. Curriculum Inquiry, 35, 213-234. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00325.x
24.
LynchK. (2012). On the market: Neoliberalism and new Managerialism in Irish education (Social Justice Series; Vol. 12, No. 5). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4401
25.
McGarrO.GavaldonG. (2018). Exploring Spanish pre-service teachers’ talk in relation to ICT: Balancing different expectations between the University and practicum school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27, 199-209. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2018.1429950
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2004). Completing the foundations for lifelong learning: An OECD survey of upper secondary schools. Paris, France: Author.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
29.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Programme for International Student Assessment, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
30.
PereiraS.PereiraL. (2015). Digital media in primary schools: Literacy or technology? Analyzing government and media discourses. Educational Policy, 29, 316-341. doi:10.1177/0895904813492378
31.
Player-KoroC. (2013). Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: A Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 381, 26-40. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.637503
32.
Player-KoroC.Bergviken RensfeldtA.SelwynN. (2018). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 33, 682-703.
33.
RizviF. (2007). Postcolonialism and Globalization in Education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 7(3), 256-263. doi:10.1177/1532708607303606
RobertsonH. J. (2003). Toward a theory of negativity: Teacher education and information and communications technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 280-296.
36.
RoumellE. A.SalajanF. D. (2016). The evolution of U.S. e-learning policy: A content analysis of the national educational technology plans. Educational Policy, 30, 365-397. doi:10.1177/0895904814550070
37.
TaylorS.RizviF.LingardB.HenryM. (1997). Education policy and the politics of change. London, England: Routledge.
38.
SalajanF. D.RoumellE. A. (2015). Two decades of e-learning policy evolution at EU level: Motivations, institutions and instruments. European Journal of Education, 15, 391-407. doi:10.1111/ejed.12144
39.
SelwynN. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical analysis. London, England: Routledge.
40.
ServageL. (2009). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the neo-liberalization of higher education: Constructing the “entrepreneurial learner.”Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39, 25-44.
41.
WirtF.MitchellD.MarshallC. (1988). Culture and education policy: Analyzing values in state policy systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 271-284.
42.
YounieS.LeaskM. (2013). Teaching with technologies: The essential guide. McGraw-hill Education.
