Learning Skills,System Equity,and Implicit Bias Within Ontario,Canada

Abstract

The reporting of students’ Learning Skills on the Ontario provincial report card provides educators and families with insight into students’ work habits. However, the evaluation process is highly subjective. This study explores teachers’ perceptions around student learning across demographic and institutional factors. This exploratory study is the first of its kind in Canada and draws data from the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), the nation’s largest public board of education, serving approximately 246,000 students (2017-2018 data). Holding achievement as an independent variable, results indicate widespread differences in teachers’ perceptions across student demographic identities and reveals significant implications on postsecondary access.

Keywords

assessment evaluation teachers’ work urban education equity social inequality race social class disability gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashdown

Bernard

(2012). Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skills benefit the social-emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of young children? Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 397-405.

Ballingall

(2015, November 3). Education, age important in post-recession Toronto, report says. Go beyond high school or face “big trouble,” says document’s co-author. Toronto Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/11/03/education-age-important-in-post-recession-toronto-report-says.html

Barnes

Mercer

(2010). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Birenbaum

DeLuca

Earl

Heritage

Klenowski

Looney

. . . Wyatt-Smith

(2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13, 117-140.

Bloom

Hastings

Madaus

(1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Brantlinger

(Ed.). (2006). Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people’s children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brown

(2010). The Grade 9 Cohort of Fall 2004. Toronto: Toronto District School Board.

Carr

Klassen

(1997). Different perceptions of race in education: Racial minority and White teachers. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(1), 67-81.

Connor

D. J.

(2017). Who is responsible for the racialized practices evident within (special) education and what can be done to change them? Theory into Practice, 56, 226-233.

10.

Danforth

Taff

Ferguson

P. M.

(2006). Place, profession, and program in the history of special education curriculum. In Brantlinger

E. A.

(Ed.), Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people’s children (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Davis

(2013). Introduction: Disability, normality and power. In Davis

Lennard J

(Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

12.

de Araujo

. (2017). Connections between secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs and their selection of tasks for English language learners. Curriculum Inquiry, 47, 363-389.

13.

DeLuca

Volante

Earl

(2015). Learning across Canada: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Education Canada, 55(2), 48-51.

14.

Duncan-Andrade

J. M. R.

Morrell

(2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

15.

End unjust and ineffective practice of streaming: Editorial. (2017, September 8). Toronto Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2017/09/08/end-unjust-and-ineffective-practice-of-academic-streaming-editorial.html

16.

Erevelles

(2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 50, 25-47.

17.

Fonseca

Zheng

(2011). The effect of education on health: Cross-country evidence (Working Paper WR-864, RAND Labor and Population). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

18.

Gershenson

Papageorge

(2018). The power of teacher expectations. Education Next, 28(1). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/power-of-teacher-expectations-racial-bias-hinders-student-attainment/

19.

Hogeveen

(2005). “The evils with which we are called to grapple”: Elite reformers, eugenicists, environmental psychologists, and the construction of Toronto’s working-class boy problem, 1860-1930. Labour/Le Travail, 55, 37-68.

20.

Irwin

(2015, April 21). Paltry pay: Why American workers without much education are being hammered. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/22/upshot/why-workers-without-much-education-are-being-hammered.html

21.

Joseph

(2010). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic learning skills. Preventing school failures, 54(2), 99-103.

22.

Kearney

Hershbein

Jacome

(2015). Profiles of change: Employment, earnings and occupations from 1990-2013. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

23.

Ladwig

McPherson

(2017). The anatomy of ability. Curriculum Inquiry, 47, 344-362.

24.

Löfgren

(2017). Swedish students’ experiences of national testing in science: A narrative approach. Curriculum Inquiry, 47, 390-410.

25.

Mao

Peck

(2013). Assessment strategies, self-regulated learning skills, and perceptions of assessment in online learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14, 75-95.

26.

Mitchell

(2010). Education that fits: Review of international trends in the education of students with special educational needs. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/86011/Mitchell-Review-Final.pdf

27.

Nicholson-Crotty

Grissom

J. A.

Nicholson-Crotty

Redding

(2016). Disentangling the causal mechanisms of representative bureaucracy: Evidence from assignment of students to gifted programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 745-757.

28.

Ontario College of Teachers. (2011). Statistical information: Membership demographics. Retrieved from http://reports.oct.ca/2011/en/stats_demographics.html

29.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (1999). Choices into action: Guidance and career education program policy for Ontario elementary and secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/13000/206413.pdf

30.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools (First Edition, Covering Grades 1-12). Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/growSuccess.pdf

31.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013). Creating pathways to success: An education and career/life planning program for Ontario schools. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/policy/cps/CreatingPathwaysSuccess.pdf

32.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2018). Achieving excellence: A renewed vision for education in Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/about/great.html

33.

Parekh

(2013). Structured pathways: An exploration of programs of study, school-wide, and in-school programs as well as promotion and transference across secondary schools in the Toronto District School Board (Research Report No. 13/14-03). Toronto: Toronto District School Board.

34.

Pew Research Center. (2014, February 11). The rising cost of not going to college. Pew Social Trends. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/02/11/the-rising-cost-of-not-going-to-college/

35.

Quan

(2017). Unlocking student potential through data. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: York University. Retrieved from http://news.yorku.ca/files/Feasibility-Study-Unlocking-Student-Potential-through-Data-FINAL-REPORT-Feb-2017.pdf

36.

Queiser

De Araujo

(2017). Still streamed: How high impact decisions are shaping students’ futures. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Social Planning Council.

37.

Rushowy

(2017, September 7). Ontario school boards to collect detailed data on hiring, suspensions. Toronto Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2017/09/07/ontario-school-boards-to-collect-race-based-stats.html

38.

Slee

(2013). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 895-907.

39.

Lloyd

Bacchus

Vicente

A. G. S.

(2017). Restructured pathways: Addressing streaming from grades 1 to 12 in the Toronto District School Board. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board.

40.

Toronto District School Board. (2018). About us. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/About-Us