State Boards of Education: Lesser Known Policy Actors

Abstract

Few scholars have engaged in close examinations of state boards of education (SBOEs), their make-up, or the broader implications of their influence over time. SBOE membership, authority, and impact differ significantly across the 50 states. This article reports findings from an exploratory study of three SBOEs and their role as policy actors. Thinking about SBOEs as policy actors focuses attention not only on the power, authority, and policy-making functions of SBOEs, but also on the individuals who serve on SBOEs, their actions, and the discourses constructed through the performance of their policy work.

Keywords

governance influence state policy state boards of education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anagnostopoulos

Rutledge

Bali

(2013). State education agencies, information systems, and the expansion of state power in the era of test-based accountability. Educational Policy, 27, 217-247. doi:10.1177/0895904813475713

Anderson

De La Cruz

Lopez

(2017). New governance and new knowledge brokers: Think tanks and universities as boundary organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 4-15. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264793

Badarak

G. W.

(1990). Recapturing the policymaking function of state boards of education. Charleston, WV: Policy and Planning Center of the Appalachia Educational Laboratory.

Ball

S. J.

(2010). New voices, new knowledges and the new politics of education research: The gathering of a perfect storm? European Educational Research Journal, 9, 124-137. doi:10.2304/eerj.2010.9.2.124

Ball

S. J.

(2017). Laboring to relate: Neoliberalism, embodied policy, and network dynamics. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 29-41. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264802

Ball

S. J.

Exley

(2010). Making policy with “good ideas”: Policy networks and the “intellectuals” of New Labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 151-169. doi:10.1080/02680930903486125

Ball

S. J.

Junemann

(2012). Networks, new governance and education. Chicago, IL: The Policy Press.

Beach

F. F.

Will

R. F.

(1955). The state and education: The structure and control of public education at the state level (Misc. No. 23). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.

Campbell

R. F.

Mazzoni

T. L.

Jr. (Eds.). (1974). State policy making for the public schools: A comparative analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University, Educational Governance Project. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED095666)

10.

Carnoy

Loeb

(2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305-331. doi:10.3102/01623737024004

11.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (1983). Educational governance in the states: A status report on state boards of education, chief state school officers, and state education agencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

12.

Deffenbaugh

W. S.

Keesecker

W. S.

(1940). State boards of education and chief state school officers: Their status and legal powers (Bulletin 1940, No. 6; Monograph No. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education, Federal Security Agency.

13.

Desimone

Smith

Hayes

Frisvold

(2005). Beyond accountability and average mathematics scores: Relating state education policy attributes to cognitive achievement domains. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 24(4), 5-18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00019.x

14.

Diem

Young

M. D.

Lee

Mansfield

Welton

(2014). Understanding critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 1068-1090.

15.

Education Commission of the States. (2006). Models of state education governance. Denver, CO: Author.

16.

Education Commission of the States. (2013). State education governance models. Denver, CO: Author.

17.

Florida Administrative Code Rule 6A. (2018). State Board of Education. Retrieved from https://www.flrules.org/gateway/organization.asp?divid=195

18.

Foundation for Excellence in Education. (2012). Florida’s education revolution: Accountability, choice and high expectations create student success. Tallahassee, FL: Author. Retrieved from http://southernecho.org/s/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/fndtn-for-excellence-in-educ-floridas-education-revolution-2012.pdf

19.

Fuller

Pearson

J. B.

(1969). Education in the states: Historical development and outlook. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

20.

Fusarelli

Cooper

(Eds.). (2009). The rising state: How state power is transforming our nation’s schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

21.

Harris

S. P.

(1973). State departments of education, state boards of education, and chief state school officers: Including reference to legally created statewide coordinating agencies for higher education (DHEW Publication No. [OE] 73-07400). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

22.

Henig

J. R.

(2012). The end of exceptionalism in American education: The changing politics of school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

23.

Howerth

I. W.

(1913). State boards of education (Bulletin No. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Keesecker

W. S.

(1950). State boards of education and chief state school officers: Their status and legal powers (Bulletin 1950, no. 12). Washington, DC: United States Office of Education, Federal Security Agency.

25.

Kysilko

(2011). State Boards: A Critical Link to Quality Education. Policy Update (NASBE), 18(2).

26.

Manna

(2012). State education governance and policy: Dynamic challenges, diverse approaches, and new frontiers. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 627-643. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2012.723508

27.

Massey

(2005). For space. London, England: Sage.

28.

McCarthy

Langdon

Olson

(1993). State education governance structures (Research No. EG-93-1). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED369167)

29.

McFarlane

(2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40, 561-567. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003

30.

Minnici

Hill

(2007). NCLB Year 5: Educational architects: Do state education agencies have the tools necessary to implement NCLB? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

31.

Mintrop

Trujilo

(2005). Corrective action in low-performing schools: Lessons for NCLB implementation from first-generation accountability systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(48). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/153/279

32.

National Association of State Boards of Education. (2012). State education governance: State-by-state chart of essential governance information. Available from http://www.nasbe.org/

33.

National Association of State Boards of Education. (2015). State education governance models. Available from http://www.nasbe.org/

34.

Newman

(2001). Modernising governance: New labour, policy and society. London, England: Sage.

35.

Schorsch

(2017, May 8). Winners and losers emerging from the 2017 legislative session. Florida Politics. Retrieved from http://floridapolitics.com/archives/237625-winners-losers-emerging-2017-legislative-session

36.

Scott

DeBray

Lubienski

Goel La Londe

Castillo

Owens

(2017). Urban regimes, intermediary organization networks, and research use: Patterns across three school districts. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 16-28. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264800

37.

Shober

A. F.

(2012). Governors make the grade: Growing gubernatorial influence in state education policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 559-575. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2012.723494

38.

Skelcher

(1998). The appointed state. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

39.

Sunderman

Orfield

(2006). Domesticating a revolution: No Child Left Behind reforms and state administrative response. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 526-563.

40.

Swaby

(2018, February 23). One Texas Board of Education primary result could spell a return to culture wars. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.texastribune.org/2018/02/23/texas-board-education-primary-could-spell-return-culture-wars/

41.

Texas Administrative Code. (2018). Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/index.html

42.

Timar

T. B.

(1997). The institutional role of state education departments: A historical perspective. American Journal of Education, 105, 231-260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1085506

43.

Triantafillou

(2004). Addressing network governance through concepts of governmentality and normalization. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26, 489-508. doi:10.1080/10841806.2004.11029471

44.

Wieder

(2012). Teach for America alums take aim at state office. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2012/06/27/teach-for-america-alums-take-aim-at-state-office

45.

Wohlstetter

Houston

D. M.

Buck

(2015). Networks in New York City: Implementing the common core. Educational Policy, 29, 85-110. doi:10.1177/0895904814556753

46.

Wolch

(1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. Public Administration, 80, 103-124.

47.

Yin

(2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

48.

Young

M. D.

(1999). Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional educational policy studies. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 677-714. doi:10.3102/00028312036004677

49.

Young

M. D.

Reynolds

A. L.

(2017). Critically examining policy workers and policy work within state boards of education. In Young

M. D.

Diem

(Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis—Moving beyond tradition (pp. 19-42). Geneva, Switzerland: Springer.