This article problematizes the lottery as a taken-for-granted concept, which is normatively understood as a neutral process rewarding its participant based on luck. The article adopts a policy problematization frame that interrogates the limits of normative concepts. To problematize the lottery system, this article engages with the two movies on school choice, The Lottery and Waiting for “Superman”, as “instances” through the conceptual lens of a quasi-market. The main argument is that the lottery is a particular discursive practice co-constituting the competitive frame of education quasi-markets. In identifying how the spirit of competitiveness underlies a competition, and by extension the lottery system, the article posits that in a competitive setting, competitors are primarily concerned with maximizing inequality among each other.
AllenA. (2011). Michael Young’s The Rise of the Meritocracy: A philosophical critique. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59, 367-382. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.582852
2.
AllenA. (2014). Benign violence: Education in and beyond the age of reason. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AppleM. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. London, England: Routledge.
4.
BacchiC. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia: Pearson Australia.
5.
BacchiC. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2, 1-8.
6.
BallS. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, Great Britain: Policy Press.
7.
BallS. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 306-313. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279
8.
BanksM. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
9.
BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.WalbergH. J. (2009). Handbook of research on school choice. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
BourdieuP. (2002). The forms of capital. In BiggartN. W. (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280-291). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11.
BrinkmannS. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in everyday life: Working with everyday life materials. Available from http://www.kobo.com
12.
BrownP. (1990). The “third wave”: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11, 65-86. doi:10.1080/0142569900110105
13.
BrownP. (2013). Education, opportunity and the prospects for social mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 678-700. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.816036
14.
BrownW. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
CarkhumR. K. (2016). Complicating choice: Nuanced portrayals of parental choice decisions (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/39693
17.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
18.
ClarkeM. (2015). “Knowledge is power”? A Lacanian entanglement with political ideology in education. Critical Studies in Education, 56, 71-85. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.977315
19.
CollinsM.CollinsG.ButtG. (2015). Social mobility or social reproduction? A case study of the attainment patterns of students according to their social background and ethnicity. Educational Review, 67, 196-217. doi:10.1080/00131911.2013.859127
20.
ConnellR. (2013). Why do market “reforms” persistently increase inequality?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 279-285.
21.
DaviesW. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London, England: Sage.
22.
DenzinN. K. (1995). The cinematic society: The voyeur’s gaze. Available from http://www.kobo.com
23.
DiemS.YoungM. D.WeltonA. D.MansfieldK. C.LeeP.-L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 1068-1090. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916007
24.
DumasM. J. (2013). “Waiting for Superman” to save black people: Racial representation and the official antiracism of neoliberal school reform. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 531-547. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.822621
25.
FeinbergW.LubienskiC. (2008). School choice policies and outcomes: Empirical and philosophical perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
FieldS.KuczeraM.PontB. (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Publishing.
27.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
28.
FrankenbergE.Siegel-HawleyG. (2013). A segregating choice? An overview of charter school policy, enrollment trends, and segregation. In OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (Eds.), Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 129-144). Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
FriedmanM. (1955). The role of government in education. In SoloR. A. Q. (Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123-144). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
GoldringE. B. (2009). Perspectives on magnet schools. In BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 361-378). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
GoldthorpeJ. (2003). The myth of education-based meritocracy. New Economy, 10, 234-239. doi:10.1046/j.1468-0041.2003.00324.x
33.
GorurR. (2013). My school, my market. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 214-230.
34.
GrenfellM.JamesD. (1998). Bourdieu and education: Acts of political theory. London, England: Falmer Press.
35.
GuggenheimD. (2010). Waiting for “Superman”: How we can save America’s failing public schools [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Vantage.
36.
GulsonK. N.WebbP. T. (2016). Not just another alternative school: Policy problematization, neoliberalism, and racial biopolitics. Educational Policy, 30, 153-170. doi:10.1177/0895904815615438
37.
HargreavesA.GoodsonI. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 3-41. doi:10.1177/0013161x05277975
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 177-205.
40.
HoxbyC. M. (2003). The economics of school choice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
41.
JhaT.BuckinghamJ. (2015). Free to choose charter schools: How charter and for-profit schools can boost public education. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Centre for Independent Studies.
42.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
LubienskiC.GulosinoC.WeitzelP. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115, 601-647. doi:10.1086/599778
MarginsonS. (1993). Markets in Australian higher education (CSHE Research Working Papers No. 93.9). Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
46.
McGinnK. C.Ben-PorathS. (2014). Parental engagement through school choice: Some reasons for caution. Theory and Research in Education, 12, 172-192. doi:10.1177/1477878514530714
47.
McNameeS. J.MillerR. K. (2009). The meritocracy myth (2nd ed.). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
MikosL. (2014). Analysis of films. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 409-423). London, England: Sage.
MirowskiP. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. Retrieved from http://www.versobooks.com/
51.
MussetP. (2012). School choice and equity: Policies in OECD countries and a literature review (OECD Education Working Papers No. 66). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Publishing. doi:10.1787/1785k1789fq23507vc-en
O’FarrellC. (2005). Michel Foucault. London, England: Sage.
54.
OrfieldG. (2013). Choice and civil rights: Forgetting history, facing consequences. In OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (Eds.), Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 3-36). Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2015). Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Publishing.
56.
PeckJ. (2015). (Neo)liberalism, popular media, and the political struggle for the future of US public education. European Journal of Communication, 30, 587-603. doi:10.1177/0267323115597853
57.
PernaL. W.MayH.YeeA.RansomT.RodriguezA.FesterR. (2015). Unequal access to rigorous high school curricula: An exploration of the opportunity to benefit from the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP). Educational Policy, 29, 402-425. doi:10.1177/0895904813492383
58.
RabinowP. (2003). Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
RabinowP.RoseN. (2003). The essential Foucault. New York, NY: The New Press.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
62.
SacklerM. (2010). The lottery [Motion picture]. United States: Great Curve Films.
63.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 715-719. doi:10.1177/1077800414532435
65.
ScottJ. T. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 580-599. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2011.616445
66.
SellarS. (2013). Equity, markets and the politics of aspiration in Australian higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 245-258. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.770250
67.
SellarS.LingardB. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49, 464-485. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
68.
Siegel-HawleyG.FrankenbergE. (2013). Designing choice: Magnet school structures and racial diversity. In OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (Eds.), Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 107-125). Berkeley: University of California Press.
SimonsM.OsslenM.PetersM. A. (2009). Re-reading educational policies: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
71.
SmrekarC. (2009). The social context of magnet schools. In BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 393-407). New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
StoneD. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
73.
StoneP. (2008). What can lotteries do for education?Theory and Research in Education, 6, 267-282. doi:10.1177/1477878508095583
74.
StulbergL. M. (2008). Race, schools, and hope. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
SwalwellK.AppleM. W. (2011). Starting the wrong conversations: The public school crisis and “Waiting for Superman.”Educational Policy, 25, 368-382. doi:10.1177/0895904810397340
77.
TanC. (2012). The culture of education policy making: Curriculum reform in Shanghai. Critical Studies in Education, 53, 153-167. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.672333
78.
WebbP. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 364-376. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.762480
79.
WhittyG.PowerS. (2005). Devolution and choice in three countries. In WhittyG. (Ed.), Making sense of education policy: Studies in the sociology and politics of education (pp. 46-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
YoudellD. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
81.
YoungM. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033: An essay on education and society. London, England: Thames & Hudson.
