Policy makers have long seen parents and families as key levers for improving U.S. student outcomes and success, and new cross-sector collaborative policy and initiatives provide a promising context for innovations in efforts to engage nondominant families in educational equity reform. Drawing on a lens of equitable collaboration, this study examined the strategies in three organizational efforts to improve family engagement in education within a common cross-sector collaboration initiative in a Western region of the United States. Although conventional approaches persisted amid regular exchanges across organizations, we identified more reciprocal, collective, and relational strategies: (a) parent capacity-building, (b) relationship-building, and (c) systemic capacity-building efforts. Despite promising strategies, the dynamics of implementation in the cross-sector collaborative constrained change and mirrored limitations in family engagement practice and policy. The article concludes with next steps for research, practice, and policy in the journey toward more equitable collaboration.
AndersonG. L. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 571-603.
2.
AnyonJ. (2009). Progressive social movements and educational equity. Educational Policy, 23, 194-215.
3.
AuerbachS. (2012). School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
Baquedano-LópezP.AlexanderR.HernandezS. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37, 149-182.
5.
BolivarJ. M.ChrispeelsJ. (2010). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 4-38.
6.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
7.
BrykA.SebringP.AllensworthE.EastonJ.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
ChrispeelsJ.GonzalezM. (2006). No parent left behind: The role of parent education programs in assisting families to actively engage in their children’s education (Unpublished study). University of California, San Diego.
9.
ConnerJ.ZainoK. (2014). Orchestrating effective change: How youth organizing influences education policy. American Journal of Education, 120, 173-203.
10.
CooperC. (2009). Performing cultural work in demographically changing schools: Implications for expanding transformative leadership frameworks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 694-724.
11.
CrowsonR.BoydW. (2001). The new role of community development in educational reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 9-29.
12.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1994). Consejos: The power of cultural narratives. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25, 298-316.
13.
EpsteinJ. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-712.
14.
FineM. (1993). Parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools & responses. The Teachers College Record, 94, 682-729.
15.
Gordon da CruzC. (2015, April). Interest convergence across communities and universities. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
16.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook for team-based qualitative research. Plymouth, UK: Altamira Press.
17.
GutiérrezK. D.MoralesP. Z.MartinezD. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212-245.
18.
HendersonA.MappK. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement (Report). Austin, TX: National Center for Family & Community Connections with Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
19.
HenigJ. R.RiehlC. J.RebellM. A.WolffJ. R. (2015). Putting collective impact in context: A review of the literature on local cross-sector collaboration to improve education. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University, Department of Education Policy and Social Analysis.
20.
HillL. (2003). Becoming a manager: How new managers master the challenges of leadership (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
HongS. (2011). A cord of three strands: A new approach to parent engagement in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22.
HorsfordS.HeiligJ. (2014). Community-based education reform in urban contexts: Implications for leadership, policy, and accountability. Urban Education, 49, 867-870.
23.
IshimaruA.M.TorresK.SalvadorJ.LottJ.WilliamsD.TranC. (2016). Reinforcing deficit, journeying towards equity: Cultural brokering in family engagement initiatives. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1-33.
24.
IshimaruA.M.Barajas-LópezF.BangM. (2015). Centering family knowledge to develop children’s empowered mathematics identities. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 1(4), 1-21.
25.
IshimaruA. M. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188-216.
26.
IshimaruA.M.LottJ., & the Equitable Parent-School Collaboration Research Project (2014). Charting a course to equitable collaboration: Learning from parent engagement initiatives. College of Education, University of Washington: Seattle, WA.
27.
IshimaruA. (2013). From heroes to organizers: Principals and education organizing in urban school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1):3-51.
28.
JezewskiM. (1990). Culture brokering in migrant farmworker health care. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 12, 497-513.
29.
KaniaJ.KramerM. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9, 36-41.
30.
KhalifaM. (2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 424-467.
31.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. N. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37-53.
32.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (2003). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other (Reprint ed.). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
33.
Lawrence-LightfootS.DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
LawsonH. (2013). Third-generation partnerships for P-16 pipelines and cradle-through-career education systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 88, 637-656.
35.
LawsonM.Alameda-LawsonT. (2012). A case study of school-linked, collective parent engagement. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 651-684.
36.
LoomerB. (1976). Two conceptions of power. Process Studies, 6, 5-32.
37.
LópezG. R. (2001). The value of hard work: Lessons on parent involvement from an (im)migrant household. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 416-437.
MarshJ.StrunkK.BushS.HuguetA. (2015). Democratic engagement in district reform: The evolving role of parents in the Los Angeles Public School Choice Initiative. Educational Policy, 29, 51-84.
40.
MawhinneyH.SmrekarC. (1996). Institutional constraints to advocacy in collaborative services. Educational Policy, 10, 480-501.
41.
MaxwellJ. (2005). Applied Social Research Methods Series: Vol. 41. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MedirattaK.ShahS.McAlisterS. (2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and successes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
43.
MollL.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
44.
NakagawaK. (2000). Unthreading the ties that bind: Questioning the discourse of parent involvement. Educational Policy, 14, 443-472.
45.
National Center on Parent, Family and Community. (2011). The head start parent, family, and community engagement framework. Arlington, VA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, and Office of Head Start.
46.
NogueraP. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
OlivosE. (2006). The power of parents: A critical perspective of bicultural parent involvement in public schools (Vol. 290). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
48.
ParkS.HironakaS.CarverP.NordstrumL. (2013). Continuous improvement in education (White paper). Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
49.
Pérez CarreónG.DrakeC.Calabrese BartonA. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 465-498.
50.
SandersM. G. (2012). Sustaining programs of school, family, and community partnerships: A qualitative longitudinal study of two districts. Educational Policy, 26, 845-869.
51.
ShirleyD. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
52.
SmrekarC.MawhinneyH. (1999). Integrated services: Challenges in linking schools, families, and communities. In MurphyJ.LewisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
StoneC. N. (2001). Civic capacity and urban education. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 595-619.
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). The dual capacity-building framework for family-school partnerships. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL).
55.
WarrenM. R. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 133-173.
56.
WarrenM. R.HongS.RubinC.UyP. (2009). Beyond the bake sale: A community-based relational approach to parent engagement in schools. The Teachers College Record, 111, 2209-2254.
57.
WarrenM. R.MappK. & Community Organizing for Education Reform Project. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
WeissH.LopezE.RosenbergH. (2010). Beyond random acts: Family, school and community engagement as an integral part of education (Report). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
59.
WestmorelandH.RosenbergH.LopezM. E.WeissH. (2009, July). Seeing is believing: Promising practices for how school districts promote family engagement (Issue brief). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
