Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2017-11
Can STEM Be Stemmed? An Essay Review of Andrew Hacker,The Math Myth and Other STEM Delusions (New York,NY: The New Press,2016. 239 pp. $25.95. ISBN 978-1-62097-068-3)
Educational policy in a number of nations has stressed the importance of STEM and advanced mathematics. This article examines Andrew Hacker’s analysis of the uncritical acceptance of STEM and advanced mathematics and of its empirical, epistemological, political, and educational assumptions. Although I support Hacker’s claims, I also raise a number of questions about some of his own assumptions and arguments. On the whole, however, The Math Myth is an important book, one that should be read by both supporters of STEM in curriculum and teaching and by those who are deeply concerned about its dominance.
AppleM. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AppleM. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AppleM. W. (2012). Education and power (Revised Routledge Classic Edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
AppleM. W. (2013). Can education change society?New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
AppleM. W. (2014). Official knowledge: Democratic education in conservative times (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
AppleM. W. (2016). Countering myths about public schools. Educational Policy, 30, 649-656.
7.
AuW.BrownA.CalderonD. (2016). Reclaiming the multicultural roots of U.S. curriculum: Communities of color and official knowledge in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
8.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BerlinerD.GlassG., & Associates. (2014). 50 myths & lies that threaten America’s public schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
10.
BinderA. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
