Applied STEM Coursework,High School Dropout Rates,and Students With Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Applied science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) coursetaking is becoming more commonplace in traditional high school settings to help students reinforce their learning in academic STEM courses. Throughout U.S. educational history, vocational education has been a consistent focus for schools to keep students on the school-to-career pathway. However, very few studies have examined the role of applied STEM coursetaking in improving schooling outcomes for students with learning disabilities. This is a major missing link as students with learning disabilities tend to exhibit much higher dropout rates than students from the general population. This study examines mechanisms displayed through applied STEM courses and the role they play in helping students with learning disabilities complete high school and transition into college. Using a nationally representative data set of high school students and their full transcripts (i.e., Education Longitudinal Study of 2002), we found that students with learning disabilities who took applied STEM courses significantly increased their educational outcomes in the following ways: lowered chances of dropout, increased math test scores, and increased enrollment in postsecondary education. While the general student population also benefited by taking applied STEM courses, the advantages were greater for those students with learning disabilities.

Keywords

disability educational equity high schools persistence secondary education applied STEM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

(2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC.

Alexander

K. L.

Entwisle

D. R.

Horsey

C. S.

(1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87-107.

Allegheny College. (2014, December 12). Student with learning disabilities or ADHD. Retrieved from http://sites.allegheny.edu/disabilityservices/student-with-learning-disabilities-or-adhd/

American Insititutes for Research. (2013). How career and technical education can help students be college and career ready: A primer. Washington, DC: Author.

Artiles

A. J.

Kozleski

E. B.

Trent

S. C.

Osher

Ortiz

(2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279-299.

Astone

N. M.

McLanahan

S. S.

(1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31, 575-584.

Battin-Pearson

Newcomb

M. D.

Abbott

R. D.

Hill

K. G.

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

(2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 568-582.

Bishop

J. H.

Mane

(2004). The impacts of career-technical education on high school completion and labor market success. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 381-402.

Blackorby

Wagner

(1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399-413.

10.

Bozick

Dalton

(2013). Career and technical education and academic progress at the end of high school: Evidence from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.

11.

Bradby

Hudson

(2007). The 2007 revision of the career/technical education portion of the secondary school taxonomy (No. NCES 2008-030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

12.

Brigham

F. J.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 223-232.

13.

Brody

L. E.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Effects of high school coursework and time on SAT scores. Journal of Edcuational Psychology, 82(4), 866-875.

14.

Brooks

Chavez

Tritz

Teasley

(2015). Reducing selection bias in quasi-experimental education studies. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 295-299). Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2723576.2723614

15.

Card

Krueger

A. B.

(1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 1-40. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.ucsb.edu:2048/stable/info/2138804

16.

Cortiella

(2013). Diplomas at risk: A critical look at the graduation rate of students with learning disabilities. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.

17.

Doll

J. J.

Eslami

Walters

(2013). Understanding why students drop out of high school, according to their own reports: Are they pushed or pulled, or do they fall out? A comparative analysis of seven nationally representative studies. SAGE Open, 3, 1-15.

18.

Evans

W. N.

Schwab

R. M.

(1995). Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 941-974.

19.

Faulkner

V. N.

Crossland

C. L.

Stiff

L. V.

(2013). Predicting eighth-grade algebra students with individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 329-345.

20.

Gottfried

M. A.

Bozick

Srinivasan

S. V.

(2014). Beyond academic math: The role of applied STEM coursetaking in high school. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1-35.

21.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2015). The influence of applied STEM coursetaking on advanced mathematics and science coursetaking. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 382-399.

22.

Gottfried

M. A.

Bozick

(2016). Supporting the STEM pipeline: Linking applied STEM coursetaking in high school to declaring a STEM major in college. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2), 177-202.

23.

Gregg

(2007). Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 219-228.

24.

Gronneberg

Johnston

(2015). 7 things you should know about universal design for learning. Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.

25.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

26.

Jenson

R. J.

Petri

A. N.

Day

A. D.

Truman

K. Z.

Duffy

(2011). Perceptions of self-efficacy among STEM students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24, 269-283.

27.

Jimerson

Egeland

Sroufe

L. A.

Carlson

(2000). A prospective longitudinal study of high school dropouts examining multiple predictors across development. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 525-549.

28.

Karweit

(1993). Contextual learning: A review and synthesis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

29.

Kaufman

Alt

M. N.

Chapman

C. D.

(2004). Dropout rates in the United States: 2001 (No. NCES 2005-046). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

30.

Kemple

J. J.

Snipes

J. C.

(2000). Career Academies: Impacts on students’ engagement and performance in high school. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation

31.

Kortering

Braziel

(2002). A look at high school programs as perceived by youth with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 177-188.

32.

Lee

(2012). College for all: Gaps between desirable and actual P–12 math achievement trajectories for college readiness. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 43-55.

33.

Lee

V. E.

Frank

K. A.

(1990). Students’ characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63(3), 178-193.

34.

Lessard

Butler-Kisber

Fortin

Marcotte

Potvin

Royer

(2008). Shades of disengagement: High school dropouts speak out. Social Psychology of Education, 11(1), 25-42.

35.

Long

M. C.

Conger

Iatarola

(2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 285-322.

36.

Moon

N. W.

Todd

R. L.

Morton

D. L.

Ivey

(2012). Accommodating students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Findings from research and practice for middle grades through university education. Atlanta, GA: Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology.

37.

National Assessment of Vocational Education Independent Advisory Panel. (2004). Earning, learning, and choice: Career and technical education works for students and employers. Washington, DC: National Assessment of Vocational Education.

38.

National Dropout Prevention Center/Network. (2014, June 2). Career and technical education. Retrieved from http://www.dropoutprevention.org/effective-strategies/career-and-technology-education-cte

39.

National Science Foundation. (2008). Broadening participation at the National Science Foundation: A framework for action. Arlington, VA: Author.

40.

National Science Foundation. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011 (NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA: Author.

41.

National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Arlington, VA: Author.

42.

Plank

S. B.

DeLuca

Estacion

(2008). High school dropout and the role of career and technical education: A survival analysis of surviving high school. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 345-370.

43.

Pryor

J. H.

Hurtado

DeAngelo

Blake

L. P.

Tran

(2009). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2009, expanded edition. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.

44.

Reschly

A. L.

Christenson

S. L.

(2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276-292.

45.

Riegle-Crumb

(2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 101-122.

46.

Rumberger

R. W.

Larson

K. A.

(1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1-35.

47.

Schargel

Smink

(2001). Strategies to help solve our school dropout problem. New York, NY: Eye on Education.

48.

Schneider

Swanson

Riegle-Crumb

(1997). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25-53.

49.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Bakken

J. P.

Brigham

F. J.

(1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1-15.

50.

Shifrer

Callahan

(2010). Technology and communications coursework: Facilitating the progression of students with learning disabilities though high school science and math coursework. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 65-76.

51.

Shifrer

Callahan

R. M.

Muller

(2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 656-682. doi:10.3102/0002831213479439

52.

Steere

D. E.

Rose

E. D.

Cavaiuolo

(2007). Growing up: Transition to adult life for students with disabilities. Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books/about/Growing_up.html?id=a33uAAAAMAAJ&;pgis=1

53.

Stetser

M. C.

Stillwell

(2014). Public high school four-year on time graduation rates and event dropout rates: School years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. First look (No. NCES 2014-391). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

54.

Stone

J. R. I.

Alfeld

Pearson

(2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 767-795. doi:10.3102/0002831208317460

55.

Stone

J. R. I.

Lewis

M. V.

(2012). College and career ready in the 21st century: Making high school matter. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

56.

Thornberry

T. P.

Moore

Christenson

R. L.

(1985). The effect of dropping out of high school on subsequent criminal behavior. Criminology, 23, 3-18.

57.

Thurlow

M. L.

Sinclair

M. F.

Johnson

D. R.

(2002). Students with disabilities who drop out of school—Implications for policy and practice. Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.

58.

Tyson

Lee

Borman

K. M.

Hanson

M. A.

(2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243-270.

59.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Education: Elementary and secondary education: Completions and dropouts. Washington, DC: Author.

60.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top Program: Executive summary. Washington, DC.

61.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). 36th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2014.

62.

Vallerand

Fortier

M. S.

Guay

(1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.

63.

Wimberly

G. L.

Noeth

R. J.

(2005). College readiness begins in middle school. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing ACT Inc.

64.

Yamauchi

Leigh

(2011). Which children benefit from non-parental care? Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1468-1490.

65.

Zelkowski

(2010). Secondary Mathematics: Four credits, block schedules, continuous enrollment? What maximizes college readiness? The Mathematics Educator, 20, 8-21.