Multilayered disciplinary policies including sophisticated surveillance mechanisms and harsh punitive practices increasingly characterize schools in the United States. Researchers contend that these modalities funnel students into prisons and produce “prison-like” conditions and/or militarized spaces. Most studies have examined the effects of these school policies and practices on boys of color, particularly Black boys. Although these frameworks are useful, they obscure the relationship that school discipline policies have to Black girls and violence. Based on a 12-month case study of a high school in northern California, “Against Captivity: Black Girls and School Discipline in the Afterlife of Slavery,” finds that through formal discipline policies and informal punitive practices, Black girls’ are subject to constant surveillance while their lives are perpetually disavowed. This article contends that school discipline policies position Black girls as “captive objects.” The girls are under constant surveillance while they are refused access to agency, autonomy, and self-defense against multiple forms of violence including gratuitous punishment inflicted by school faculty.
Advancement Project. (2011). No Child Left Behind catalyzes “school-to-prison pipeline.”Washington, DC: Author.
2.
African American Policy Forum and Columbia Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies. (2014). Black girls matter: Pushed out, overpoliced and underprotected. New York, NY: Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies.
3.
African American Policy Forum and Columbia Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies. (2015). Say her name: Resisting police brutality against Black Women. New York, NY: Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies.
4.
AyersW.DohrnB.AyersR. (2001). Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. A handbook for parents, students, educators, and citizens. New York, NY: New Press.
5.
BlakeJ. J.ButlerB. R.LewisC. W.DarensbourgA. (2011). Unmasking the inequitable discipline experiences of urban black girls: Implications for urban educational stakeholders. The Urban Review, 43, 90-106.
Chesney-LindM.IrwinK. (2008). Beyond bad girls: Gender, violence and hype. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CrenshawK. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: New Press.
10.
CrenshawK. (2012). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418-1472.
11.
DavisJ. E.JordanW. J. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high school. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 570-587.
12.
DillonS. (2012). Possessed by death: The neoliberal carceral state, Black feminism, and the afterlife of slavery. Radical History Review, 2012(112), 113-125.
13.
DumasM. J. (2014). Losing an arm: Schooling as a site of black suffering. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17, 1-29.
14.
FergusonA. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
17.
FuentesA. (2012). Arresting development: Zero tolerance and the criminalization of children. Rethinking Schools, 26(2), 18-23.
18.
GilliesD.TaylorF.GrayC.O’BrienL.D’AbrewN. (2013). Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents [Review]. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, 8, 1004-1116.
19.
GreeneJ. A. (1999). Zero tolerance: A case study of police policies and practices in New York City. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 171-187.
20.
HartmanS. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
HartmannH.ChildersC.ShawE. (2015). Toward our children’s keeper: A data-driven analysis of the interim report of the My Brother’s Keeper Initiative shows the shared fate of boys and girls of color. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research and the African American Policy Forum.
22.
Hill-CollinsP. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
JamesJ. (1999). Shadowboxing: Representations of Black feminist politics. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
24.
JamesJ.Sharpley-WhitingT. D. (2000). The Black feminist reader. New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.
25.
JonesN. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
KafkaJ. (2011). The history of “zero tolerance” in American public schooling. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
KataokaS.LangleyA. K.WongM.BawejaS.SteinB. D. (2012). Responding to students with posttraumatic stress disorder in schools. Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 21, 119-133.
28.
KimC. Y.LosenD. J.HewittD. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.
29.
LosenD. J.SkibaR. J. (2010). Suspended education: Urban middle schools in crisis. Montgomery, AL: Southern Poverty Law Center.
30.
LyonsW.DrewJ. (2006). Punishing schools: Fear and citizenship in American public education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
MeinersE. R. (2007). Right to be hostile: Schools, prisons, and the making of public enemies. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
MeinersE. R. (2011). Ending the school-to-prison pipeline/building abolition futures. The Urban Review, 43, 547-565.
33.
MonroeC. R. (2006). African American boys and the discipline gap: Balancing educators’ uneven hand. Educational Horizons, 84, 102-111.
34.
MorrisE. W. (2007). Ladies or loudies? Perceptions and experiences of black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 490-515.
35.
MorrisM. (2012). Race, gender and the school-to-prison pipeline. African American Forum, 1, 2-12.
NguyenN. (2015). Chokepoint: Regulating US student mobility through biometrics. Political Geography, 46, 1-10.
38.
NocellaA.IIParmerP.StovallD. (2014). From education to incarceration: Dismantling the school to prison pipeline. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
39.
NogueraP. (2008). The trouble with black boys: . . . And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
NolanK. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. New York, NY: Sage.
42.
RichieB. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
RichieB. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York: New York University Press.
44.
RobertsD. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
45.
RobertsD. (2011). Prison, foster care, and the systemic punishment of black mothers. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1474.
46.
SaldañaJ. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. New York, NY: Sage.
47.
SaltmanK. J. (2007). Capitalizing on Disaster: Taking and Breaking Public Schools. Herndon, VA: Paradigm Publishers.
48.
SaltmanK. J.GabbardD. A. (2011). Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
SextonJ. (2007). Racial profiling and the societies of control. In JamesJ. (Ed.), Warfare in the American homeland: Policing and prison in a penal democracy (pp. 197-218). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
SextonJ. (2010). People-of-color-blindness notes on the afterlife of slavery. Social Text, 28(2_103), 31-56.
51.
SharmaS. (2013). Girls behind bars: Reclaiming education in transformative spaces. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
52.
SkibaR. J.KnestingK. (2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 2001(92), 17-43.
53.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317-342.
54.
SkibaR. J.PetersonR. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66, 335-396.
SojoynerD. M. (2013). Black radicals make for bad citizens: Undoing the myth of the school to prison pipeline. Berkeley Review of Education, 4(2). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/35c207gv
57.
SteinS. J. (2004). The culture of education policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58.
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Office of civil rights: Civil rights data collection. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
59.
WaldJ.LosenD. J. (2003). Defining and redirecting a school-to-prison pipeline. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003(99), 9-15.
60.
WallaceJ. M.Jr.GoodkindS.WallaceC. M.BachmanJ. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. high school students: 1991-2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59(1-2), 47-62.
61.
WildersonF. B.III. (2010). Red, white & black: Cinema and the structure of U.S. antagonisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
WunC. (2014a). Disappeared subjects: Girls of color, school discipline and punishment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
63.
WunC. (2014b). Unaccounted foundations: Black girls, anti-black racism, and punishment in schools. Critical Sociology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0896920514560444
