Educational policy analyses have tended toward either the impact of policies on student achievement or the furthering of progressive ideals, regularly theorized through concepts of democracy. In this theoretical essay, I suggest that democracy has become a vehicle for cauterized projects of individualized and contingent state status rather than decolonization and material transformation. This is due not to intentional disregard but to limited epistemic reach. Specifically, I address the ways that the tenets of democratic theory cannot address population-level stratification and racialization of space. I close with how a critique of the limits of democratic ideals can open up space for more robust epistemological groundings.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 149-171.
15.
FrankenbergE.OrfieldG. (Eds.). (2012). The resegregation of suburban schools: A hidden crisis in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
16.
GrandeS. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
GuinierL. (2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
18.
GutmannA.ThompsonD. (2009). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707-1791.
20.
LavelleK. M. (2012). “Our generation had nothing to do with discrimination”: White Southern memory of Jim Crow and civil rights (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Texas.
21.
McLaughlinM. W. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In HargreavesA.LiebermanA.FullanM.HopkinsD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 70-84). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (2014). Brown at 60: Grea progress, a long retreat, and an uncertain future. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.
23.
PatelL. (in press). Deservingness: Challenging coloniality in education and migration scholarship. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal.
24.
RoithmayrD. (2000). Barriers to entry: A market lock-in model of discrimination. Virginia Law Review, 86, 727-799.
25.
SaezE.ZucmanG. (2014). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data (No. w20625). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26.
SmithermanG. (2006). Word from the mother: Language and African Americans. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
SpivakG. (1988). Can the subaltern speak. In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Education.
28.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 409-428.
29.
WynterS. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3, 257-337.
