This article describes how the Dutch Department of Education incorporates New Public Management (NPM) principles in educational policy, and whether conflicts of interest between the Department and schools cause deviations from NPM. We reviewed policy documents and performed secondary analyses on school data. Educational policy focuses on output indicators and accountability aspects. However, when departmental interests do not align with school interests, the Department develops new policies that partly contradict NPM principles. We argue that a more consistent focus on output and well-developed school autonomy may help to enhance the quality of education
AndersenS. C. (2008). The impact of public management reforms on student performance in Danish schools. Public Administration, 86, 541-558.
2.
BakerE. L.BartonP. E.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH. F.LinnR. L.. . . ShepardL. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (EPI Briefing paper 278). Washington: DC: Economic Policy Institute.
3.
BraunD.MerrienF. X. (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view. London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
4.
ByunK. (2008). New public management in Korean higher education: Is it reality or another fad?Asia Pacific Education Review, 9, 190-205.
5.
Cedefop. (2010). Learning outcomes approaches in VET curricula: A comparative analysis of nine European countries. Luxembourg, UK: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
6.
ChristensenT.LaegreidP. (2007). Transcending New Public Management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Abingdon, UK: Ashgate.
7.
ClarkeL.WinchC. (2007). Vocational education: International approaches, developments and systems. London, England: Routledge.
8.
EhrenM. C. M.LeeuwF. L.ScheerensJ. (2005). On the impact of the Dutch Educational Supervision Act. Analyzing assumptions concerning the inspection of primary education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 60-76.
9.
FusarelliL. D.JohnsonB. (2004). Educational governance and the new public management. Public Administration and Management, 9, 118-127.
10.
HangartnerJ.SvatonC. J. (2013). From autonomy to quality management: NPM impacts on school governance in Switzerland. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45, 354-369.
11.
HonigM. I.RaineyL. R. (2012). Autonomy and school improvement: What do we know and where do we go from here?Educational Policy, 26, 465-495.
12.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2003). Toezichtkader beroepsonderwijs en volwasseneneducatie: Inhoud en werkwijze van het Inspectietoezicht conform de WOT [Supervisory framework in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
13.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2006a). 850 uur in bve [Schooling hours in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
14.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2006b). Beroepspraktijkvorming in het mbo [Professional training in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
15.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2007a). Toezichtkader bve 2007 [Supervisory framework VET 2007]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
16.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2007b). Meer onderwijstijd in het mbo [More schooling hours in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
17.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2007c). Onderwijstijd in het vo en bve [Schooling hours in secondary education and in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
18.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2009a). Onderwijstijd bve 2009 [Schooling hours in VET 2009]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
19.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2009b). Klachtenbehandeling in het mbo [Complaint procedures in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
20.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2010a). Toezichtkader beroepsonderwijs en volwasseneneducatie: Werkwijze van het Inspectietoezicht [Dutch Inspection Framework VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
21.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2010b). Klachtenbehandeling in het mbo—2009 [Complaint procedures in VET—2009]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
22.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2010c). Besturing en onderwijskwaliteit in het mbo [Governance and quality of education in VET]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
23.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2010d). Zorgplicht arbeidsmarktperspectief mbo [The obligation to inform students about labour market perspectives]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Author.
24.
KarstenS.MeijerJ. (1999). School-based management in the Netherlands: The educational consequences of lump-sum funding. Educational Policy, 13, 421-439.
25.
LeisyteL.KiznieneD. (2006). New public management in Lithuania’s higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19, 377-396.
26.
LeneyT.GreenA. (2005). Achieving the Lisbon goal: The contribution of vocational education and training. European Journal of Education, 40, 261-278.
27.
LindgrenL. (2001). The non-profit sector meets the performance-management movement: A programme-theory approach. Evaluation, 7, 285-303.
28.
Onderwijsraad. (2000). Koers bve [Direction VET]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
29.
Onderwijsraad. (2001). WEB: Werk in uitvoering [Law on VET: A work in progress]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
30.
Onderwijsraad. (2003). Onderweg in het beroepsonderwijs [En route in VET]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
31.
Onderwijsraad. (2004a). Koers bve: Doelgericht Zelfbestuur [Direction VET: Goal-oriented autonomy]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
32.
Onderwijsraad. (2004b). Degelijk onderwijsbestuur [Solid governance]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
33.
Onderwijsraad. (2006). Versteviging van kennis in het onderwijs [Consolidation of educational knowledge]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
34.
PollittC. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear?Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2, 181-200.
35.
TaylorA. (2009). Mapping the field of VET partnerships. Vocations and Learning, 2, 127-151.
36.
TolofariS. (2005). New Public Management and education. Policy Futures in Education, 3, 75-89.
37.
van der SluisM. E.ReezigtG. J.BorghansL. (2014). Quantifying stakeholder values of VET provision in the Netherlands. Vocations and Learning, 7(1), 1-19.
