Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores the relationships between (a) the quality of state science standards and student science achievement, (b) the public’s belief in teaching evolution and the quality of state standards, and (c) the public’s belief in teaching evolution and student science achievement. Using multiple measures, we find no evidence of a relationship between the quality of a state’s science standards and student science achievement. We also examine the relationship between state-level beliefs about evolution and student achievement. Here, we find a positive and consistent relationship between a state’s acceptance of evolution and student science achievement. Our results suggest that the attitudes that the public has toward evolutionary science are strongly related to student science achievement—more so than the quality of state science standards.

Keywords

science education standards state policies evolution science achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguillard

(1999). Evolution education in Louisiana public schools: A decade following Edwards v. Aguillard. American Biology Teacher, 61, 182-188.

Aleixandre

M. P. J.

(1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 519-535.

Almy

Theokas

(2010). Not prepared for class: High-poverty schools continue to have fewer in-field teachers. Washington, DC: Education Trust.

Aoki

T. T.

(1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8, 255-268.

Bandoli

J. H.

(2008). Do state standards matter? Comparing student perceptions of the coverage of evolution in Indiana and Ohio public high schools. The American Biology Teacher, 70, 212-216.

Berkman

M. B.

Plutzer

(2010). Evolution creationism, and the battle to control America’s classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Berkman

M. B.

Plutzer

(2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science, 331, 404-405.

Berra

T. M.

(1990). Evolution and the myth of creationism: A basic guide to the facts in the evolution debate. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bishop

(2006). Polls apart on human origins. Public Opinion Pros. Retrieved from http://www.publicopinionpros.norc.org/features/2006/aug/bishop.asp

10.

Bowman

K. L.

(2007). An empirical study of evolution, creationism, and intelligent design instruction in public schools. Journal of Law & Education, 36, 301-379.

11.

Bowman

K. L.

(2008). The evolution battles in high school science classes: Who is teaching what? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 69-72.

12.

Carmichael

Wilson

Porter-Magee

Martino

(2010). The state of state standards—and the Common Core—in 2010. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

13.

Chuang

H. C.

(2003). Teaching evolution: Attitudes and strategies of educators in Utah. American Biology Teacher, 65, 669-674.

14.

Cobb

Jackson

(2011). Assessing the quality of the Common Core state standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 40, 183-185.

15.

Coyne

J. A.

(2010). Why evolution is true. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

16.

Dagher

Z. R.

BouJaoude

(1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.

17.

Dawkins

(2009). The greatest show on earth: The evidence for evolution. New York, NY: Free Press.

18.

DeBray-Pelot

McGuinn

(2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Education Policy, 23, 15-42.

19.

Donnelly

L. A.

Boone

W. J.

(2007). Biology teachers’ attitudes toward and use of Indiana’s evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 236-257.

20.

Eve

R. A.

Dunn

(1990). Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? The American Biology Teacher, 52, 10-20.

21.

Farber

(2003). Teaching evolution and the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 65, 347-354.

22.

Fowler

S. R.

Meisels

G. G.

(2010). Florida teachers’ attitudes about teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 72, 96-99.

23.

Futuyma

D. J.

(2009). Evolution (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

24.

Goodman

(2012). Gold standards? State standards reform and student achievement,Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Paper Series, PEPG 12-05).Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED534654.pdf

25.

Griffith

J. A.

Brem

S. K.

(2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 791-809.

26.

Gross

(2005). The state of state science standards. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

27.

Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). The nation’s report card science 2009. US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2011451.pdf

28.

Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core Data. (2009). State characteristics [Data file]. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

29.

Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2009). Science, mathematics, and reading assessments [Data file]. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

30.

Jeynes

W. H.

(2003). The effects of religious commitment on the academic achievement of urban and other children. Education and Urban Society, 36, 44-62.

31.

Johnson

R. L.

Peeples

E. E.

(1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: Student acceptance of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 49, 93-96.

32.

Jones

(2009, January 28). State of the states: Political party affiliation. Gallup. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/114016/state-states-political-party-affiliation.aspx#2

33.

Kolbe

J. J.

Leal

Schoener

T. W.

Spiller

D. A.

Losos

J. B.

(2012). Founder effects persist despite adaptive differentiation: A field experiment with lizards. Science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/02/01/science.1209566

34.

Krings

Taylor

T. N.

Dotzler

(2012). Fungal endophytes as driving force in land plant evolution: Evidence from the fossil record. In Southworth

(Ed.), Biocomplexity of plant-fungal interactions (pp. 5-28). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

35.

Lauer

Snow

Martin-Glenn

Van Buhler

Stoutemyer

Snow-Renner

(2005). The influence of standards on K-12 teaching and student learning: A research synthesis. Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.

36.

Lawson

A. E.

Thompson

L. D.

(1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733-746.

37.

Lawson

A. E.

Weser

(1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: Effects of instruction and reasoning skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 589-606.

38.

Lawson

A. E.

Worsnop

W. A.

(1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief, and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143-166.

39.

Lerner

(1998). State science standards: An appraisal of science standards in 36 states. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

40.

Lerner

(2000a). Good science, bad science: Teaching evolution in the states. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

41.

Lerner

(2000b). The state of state science standards. In Finn

C. E.

Jr. Petrilli

M. J.

(Eds.), The state of state standards 2000 (pp. 22-24). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

42.

Lerner

(2012). The state of state science standards 2012. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

43.

Loveless

(2012). How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.

44.

Masci

(2009, February 4). Darwin debated: Religion vs. evolution. Pew Research Center Publications. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1105/darwin-debate-religionevolution

45.

McComas

W. F.

Lee

Sweeney

(2009, April). A critical review of current U.S. state science standards with respect to the inclusion of elements related to the nature of science. Proceedings of the 2009 NARST Annual Conference, Garden Grove, CA.

46.

McPherson

J. M.

Brinkley

(2001). Days of destiny: Crossroads in American history: America’s greatest historians examine thirty-one uncelebrated days that changed the course of history. New York, NY: DK Publishing.

47.

Mead

L. S.

Mates

(2009). Why science standards are important to a strong science curriculum and how states measure up. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 2, 359-371.

48.

Miller

J. D.

Scott

E. C.

Okamoto

(2006, August 11). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.

49.

Moore

(2000). The revival of creationism in the United States. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 17-21.

50.

Moore

(2002). Teaching evolution: Do state standards matter? BioScience, 52, 378-381.

51.

Moore

(2004). How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience, 54, 860-865.

52.

Moore

Decker

Cotner

(2010). Chronology of the evolution-creationism controversy. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing.

53.

National Center for Science Education. (2006). Louisiana governor signs creationist bill. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/news/2008/06/louisiana-governor-signs-creationist-bill-001437

54.

National Center for Science Education. (2011). What is evolution? Retrieved from http://ncse.com/evolution

55.

National Center for Science Education. (2012). Evolution (partly) restored to NSB report. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/news/2012/02/evolution-partly-restored-to-nsb-report-007190

56.

Nehm

R. H.

Kim

S. Y.

Sheppard

(2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology verses non-biology teachers. Wiley InterScience. Retrieved from http://www.stonybrook.edu/cesame/about/faculty_staff/Sheppard/ksEvoBioandnonBio.pdf

57.

Newport

(2009, August 7). Religious identity: States differ widely. Gallup. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/122075/religious-identity-states-differ-widely.aspx#2

58.

Newport

(2010, December 17). Four in 10 Americans believe in strict creationism. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/145286/Four-Americans-Believe-Strict-Creationism.aspx

59.

Newton

(2010, June 30). Evolution, creationism, and the workplace. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-newton/evolution-creationism-and_b_559353.html

60.

People for the American Way. (2000, March). Evolution and creationism in public education: An in-depth reading of public opinion. Retrieved from http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/evolutionandcreationisminpubliceducation.pdf

61.

Polling Report. (2011). Science and nature polling report. Retrieved from http://www.pollingreport.com/science.htm

62.

Porter

McMaken

Hwang

Yang

(2011). Common Core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103-137.

63.

Regnerus

M. D.

Elder

G. H.

(2003). Staying on track in school: Religious influences in high-and low-risk settings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 633-649.

64.

Reville

S. P.

(2004). High standards + high stakes = High achievement in Massachusetts. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 591-597.

65.

Rogers

A. R.

(2011). The evidence for evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

66.

Rudolph

J. L.

Stewart

(1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1069-1089.

67.

Rutledge

M. L.

Warden

M. A.

(2000). Science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31.

68.

Scherer

(2001). How and why standards can improve student achievement: A conversation with Robert J. Marzano. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 14-18.

69.

Shankar

Skoog

(1993). Emphasis given evolution and creationism by Texas high school biology teachers. Science Education, 77, 221-233.

70.

Spillane

(2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.

71.

Spillane

(2002). Local theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers College Record, 104, 377-420.

72.

Swanson

C. B.

(2006). Making the connection: A decade of standards-based reforms. Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.

73.

Tatina

(1989). South Dakota high school biology teachers and the teaching of evolution and creationism. The American Biology Teacher, 51, 275-280.

74.

Trimble

(2003). What works to improve student achievement. National Middle School Association. Retrieved from http://www.ncmle.org/research%20summaries/ressum20.html

75.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). American fact finder [Data file]. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml

76.

Whitehurst

G. R.

(2009). Don’t forget curriculum (Brown Center Letters on Education). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

77.

Van Koevering

T.E.

Stiehl

R.B.

(1989).Evolution, creation, and Wisconsin biology teachers.The American Biology Teacher, 51(4), 200-202.

78.

Wiles

Branch

(2008). Teachers who won’t, don’t or can’t teach evolution properly: A burning issue. The American Biology Teacher, 70, 5-6.

79.

Wolbrecht

Hartney

(2011). Explaining party position change: The case of education policy. Proceedings from 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1901041

80.

Zimmer

(2009). The tangled bank: An introduction to evolution. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company.

Science Standards,Science Achievement,and Attitudes About Evolution

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References