Many nation-states have realized the importance of tertiary education and the world has seen a corollary increase in tertiary education enrollments. Using Berry and Berry’s event history model as a framework, this study tests both the internal features of each country and the influence that nation-states have on each other with regard to setting tertiary enrollment policies. As expanding tertiary education is an important policy worldwide, we use Trow’s classification to define two levels of tertiary education expansion: first, increasing gross tertiary enrollment rates above 15% (from elite to massified), and second, above 50% (from massified to universal). Analyzing a unique cross-national panel dataset, which spans the time period from 1999 to 2005, our findings show that both internal determinants (secondary education participation rates and the political landscape) as well as diffusion factors (proximity to a pioneering nation and regional variables) influence nations in setting tertiary enrollment policies.
AllisonP. D. (2010). Survival analysis. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 413-424). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BeckT.ClarkeG.GroffA.KeeferP.WalshP. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 165-176.
3.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395-415.
4.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In SabatierP. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 169-200). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
5.
BrooksS. M. (2005). Interdependence and domestic foundations of policy change: The diffusion of pension privatization around the world. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 273-294.
6.
CabreraA. F.La NasaS. M. (2000). Three critical tasks America’s disadvantaged face on their path to college. In CabreraA. F.La NasaS. M. (Eds.), Understanding the college choice of disadvantaged students: New directions for institutional research (Vol. 107, pp. 23-29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Cohen-VogelL.IngleW. K. (2007). When neighbors matter most: Innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 241-262.
8.
Correlates of War Project. (2011). Direct contiguity data, 1816-2006, version 3.1 [Data file]. Available from http://www.correlatesofwar.org/
9.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187-220.
10.
DelaneyJ. A.YuP. (2013). Policy innovation and tertiary education graduation rates: A cross-country analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(3), pp. 387–409. DOI:10.1080/03057925.2012.728375.
11.
DelaneyJ. A.YuP. (2014). The role of tuition fees in the spread of higher education around the globe. In ArayaD.MarberP. (Eds.), Higher education in the global age: Policy, practice and promise in emerging societies (pp. 288-326). New York: Routledge.
12.
DesJardinsS. L. (2001). Assessing the effects of changing institutional aid policy. Research in Higher Education, 42, 653-678.
13.
DesJardinsS. L. (2003). Event history methods: Conceptual issues and an application to student departure from college. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII, pp. 421-471). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. A.McCallB. P. (1999). An event history model of student departure. Economics of Education Review, 18, 375-390.
15.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. A.McCallB. P. (2002a). Simulating the longitudinal effects of changes in financial aid on student departure from college. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 653-679.
16.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. A.McCallB. P. (2002b). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 555-581.
17.
DoyleW. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 259-285.
18.
DoyleW. R.DelaneyJ. A. (2010, April). Recovery from cuts: How long does it take for state spending for higher education to return to previous levels?Paper presented at the 2010 American Educational Research Association conference, Denver, CO.
19.
FurthD. (1978). Selection and equity: International viewpoint. Comparative Education Review, 22, 259-277.
GochmanC. S. (1991). Interstate metrics: Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and measuring the geographic proximity of states since the congress of Vienna. International Interactions, 17, 93-112.
22.
HellerD. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 624-659.
23.
HellerD. E. (2002). State aid and student access: The changing picture. In HellerD. E. (Ed.), Condition of access: Higher education for lower income students (pp. 59-72). Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
HenselP. R. (2007). Documentation for COW direct contiguity data, version 3.1 [Correlates of War Project]. Available from http://www.correlatesofwar.org/
25.
JohnstoneD. B.MarcucciP. N. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: Who pays? Who should pay?Baltimore, MD: JohnHopkinsUniversity Press.
26.
KalbfleischJ. D.PrenticeR. L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
27.
KaplanE. L.MeierP. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association, 53, 457-481.
KellerK. R. I. (2006). Education expansion, expenditures per student and the effects on growth in Asia. Global Economic Review, 35, 21-42.
30.
LeslieL. L.BrinkmanP. T. (1987). Student price response in higher education: The student demand studies. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 181-204.
31.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C.DeatonR. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1-24.
32.
McLendonM. K.HellerD. E.YoungS. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363-400.
33.
McMahonW. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkinsUniversity Press.
34.
MurtaughP. A.BurnsL. D.SchusterJ. (1999). Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education, 40, 355-371.
35.
PernaL. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 117-141.
36.
PevehouseJ.NordstromT. (2003). Codebook for Correlates of War 2 international governmental organizations data set version 2.1 [Correlates of War Project]. Available from http://www.correlatesofwar.org/
37.
SchoferE.MeyerJ. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70, 898-920.
38.
SchultzT. P. (1998). The formation of human capital and the economic development of Africa: Returns to health and schooling investments (Economic Research Papers No. 37). New Haven, CT: Department of Economics, YaleUniversity.
39.
SimmonsB. A. (2000). International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94, 819-835.
40.
SimmonsB. A.ElkinsZ. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98, 171-189.
41.
STATACorp. (2009). STATA survival analysis and epidemiological tables reference manual: Release 11. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
42.
StinnettD. M.TirJ.SchaferP.DiehlP. F.GochmanC. (2002). The correlates of War Project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 19(2), 58-66.
43.
St. JohnE. P. (1990). Price response in enrollment decisions: An analysis of the high school and beyond sophomore cohort. Research in Higher Education, 31, 161-176.
44.
TrowM. (1972). The expansion and transformation of higher education. International Review of Education, 18, 61-84.
45.
TrowM. (1976). Elite higher education: An endangered species?Minerva, 14, 355-376.
46.
TrowM. (2000). From mass higher education to universal access: The American advantage. Minerva, 37, 303-328.
47.
WagnerA. P. (2006). Measuring up internationally: Developing skills and knowledge for the global knowledge economy. San Jose, CA: NationalCenter for public Policy and Higher Education.
