Rates of student homelessness have increased dramatically throughout the United States in recent years, yet there has been a dearth of scholarly analysis devoted to key organizations’ engagement of the issue. Given that the federal McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act has taken on a central, but underexamined role in shaping this engagement, this article analyzes the policy’s shaping of school, district, and community responses to conditions of homelessness. Focusing on issues of policy specificity, authority, power, consistency, and stability, the article suggests that McKinney–Vento has had a positive, yet limited influence on schools and students. For more widespread and effective implementation of the policy, it is suggested that appropriate, consistent, and strategically managed funding and interorganizational collaboration are critical. These implications for research, policy, and practice are framed as being especially relevant amid the recession era, during which the crisis of homelessness in the United States has become increasingly severe.
AnooshianL. J. (2003). Social isolation and rejection of homeless children. Journal of Children & Poverty, 9(2), 115.
2.
AscherC.PhenixD. (2006). Delivering educational services to students experiencing homelessness: The challenges and successes of New York state LEA liaisons. NYS TEACHS Liaison Survey, 1-27.
3.
Aviles de BradleyA. (2008). Educational rights of homeless children and youth: Legal and community advocacy. American Educational History Journal, 35(2), 17.
4.
BucknerJ. C.BassukE.WeinrebL. (2001). Predictors of academic achievement among homeless and low-income housed children. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 45-69.
5.
Bullock et al. v. Board of Education of Montgomery County et al. DKC-2002-798 (U. S. District Court, District of Maryland, filed March14, 2002).
6.
BurtM.CarpenterJ.HallS.HendersonK.RogD.HornikJ.. . . MoronG. (2010). Strategies for improving homeless people’s access to mainstream benefits and services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
7.
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless. (2006, May, 17). Annual creative lasting solutions awards: Homeless program of the year (News Release). Denver, CO: Author
8.
CunninghamM.HarwoodR.HallS. (2010). Residential instability and the McKinney–Vento Homeless Children and Education program: What we know, plus gaps in research. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
9.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72, 433-479.
10.
DesimoneL.SmithT.FrisvoldD. (in press). Has NCLB improved teacher and teaching quality for disadvantaged students? In GamoranA. (Ed.), Will standards-based reform in education help close the poverty gap?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
DesimoneL. M.SmithT. S.HayesS.FrisvoldD. (2005). Beyond accountability and average math scores: Relating multiple state education policy attributes to changes in student achievement in procedural knowledge, conceptual understanding and problem solving in mathematics. Educationl Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(4), 5-18.
12.
DesimoneL. M.SmithT. M.PhillipsK. J. (2007). Does policy influence mathematics and science teachers’ participation in professional development?Teachers College Record, 109, 1086-1122.
13.
DesimoneL.SmithT.FrisvoldD. (2010). Survey Measures of Classroom Instruction: Comparing Student and Teacher Reports. Educational Policy, 24(2), 267-329.
14.
DuffieldB. (2001). The educational rights of homeless children: Policies and practices. Educational Studies, 32, 324-340.
15.
DuffieldB.LovellP. (2008). The economic crisis hits home: The unfolding increase in child and youth homelessness. Washington, DC: NAEHCY/First Focus.
16.
Education Funding Research Council. (2000, May). Connecting Title I and the McKinney Homeless Act: Providing services for homeless children and youth. Title I Monitor, 14-17.
17.
FantuzzoJ.PerlmanS. (2007). The unique impact of out-of-home placement and the mediating effects of child maltreatment and homelessness on early school success. Children & Youth Services Review, 29, 941-960.
18.
FinleyS.BartonA. C. (2003). The power of space: Constructing a dialog of resistance, transformation, and homelessness. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 475-479.
19.
GargiuloR. M. (2006). Homeless and disabled: Rights, responsibilities, and recommendations for serving young children with special needs. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 357-362.
20.
HelmV. M. (1993). Legal rights to education of homeless children and youth. Education & Urban Society, 25, 323.
21.
Hernandez Jozefowicz-SimbeniD. M.IsraelN. (2006). Services to homeless students and families: The McKinney-Vento act and its implications for school social work practice. Children & Schools, 28(1), 37-44.
22.
Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2011). America’s rental housing: Meeting challenges, building on opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
23.
JulianelleP. (2008). Project HOPE-Virginia. Office on the Education of Children and Youth Experiencing Homelessness.
24.
JulianelleP. F.FoscarinisM. (2003). Responding to the school mobility of children and youth experiencing homelessness: The McKinney-Vento Act and beyond. Journal of Negro Education, 72(1), 39-61.
25.
Kaleuati v. Tonda, Civil Action No. 07-504 (U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii), filed October6, 2007.
26.
KittnerG. (2010, June, 14). Schools hamstrung on ID law. Wisconsin State Journal. B1
27.
KittnerG.WorlandG. (2010, May, 7). How did alleged shooter in gang-related homicide enroll at area schools?Wisconsin State Journal. B1
28.
KuhnR.CulhaneD. (1998). Applying cluster analysis to test a typology of homelessness by pattern of shelter utilization: Results from the analysis of administrative data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 207-232.
29.
Lampkin v. District of Columbia, Civ. Action No. 92-0910 (D.D.C.), filed April15, 1992.
30.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureacracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
31.
MarkwardM.BirosE. (2001). McKinney revisited: Implications for social work. Children and Schools, 23, 182-187.
32.
Mawhinney-RhoadsL.StahlerG. (2006). Educational policy and reform for homeless students: An overview. Education & Urban Society, 38, 288-306.
33.
McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act of 1987, 42 U.S.C. ss11431 et seq.
34.
MillerP. (2007). Getting on the balcony to see the patterns on the dance floor below: Considering organizational culture in a university-school-community partnership. Journal of School Leadership, 17 (2), 222-245.
35.
MillerP. (2008). Examining Boundary Spanning Leaders in Community Contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education,11 (4), 353-377.
36.
MillerP. (2009a). An examination of the McKinney-Vento Act and its influence upon the homeless education situation. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0895904809351692.
37.
MillerP. (2009b). Boundary spanning in the homeless education situation: Notes from an emergent faculty role in Pittsburgh. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45 (4), 616-630.
38.
MillerP. (2009c). Leadership and collaboration for homeless students: Examining community perceptions. The Urban Review, 41, 222–250.
39.
MillerP. (2010). Homeless students’ education networks: A review of the literature. Paper presented at University Council on Educational Administration Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, October 30-November 1.
40.
MillerP. (2011). Homeless Families’ Education Networks: An Examination of Access and Mobilization. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(4) 543-581.
41.
Mitzi H. v. Murray and Board of Education of Homewood-Flossmoor High School District 233 and Mitzi H. v. Ramsey and Board of Education of Homewood School District 153. (filed in Cook County Circuit Court, September2002).
42.
MooreJ. (2005, December). Collaborations of schools and social service agencies (Research report: National Center for Homeless Education, 1-32). Greensboro, NC: NCHE at SERVE.
43.
MullenJ.LeginskiW. (2010). Building the capacity of the homeless service workforce. Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3, 101-110.
44.
National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2007). Homelessness counts. Washington, DC: National Alliance to End Homelessness.
45.
National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2010, May18). Economy bytes: Doubled up in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
National Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth/First Focus. (2010). A critical moment: Child & youth homelessness in our nation’s schools. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth.
48.
National Center for Homeless Education. (2010). Education for homeless children and youth program: Data collection summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
49.
ObradovićJ.LongJ. D.CutuliJ. J.ChanChi-KeungHinzE.HeistadD.MastenA. S. (2009). Academic achievement of homeless and highly mobile children in an urban school district: Longitudinal evidence on risk, growth, and resilience. Development & Psychopathology, 21, 493-518.
50.
O’LearyS. (2001). Educating homeless children. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 8, 513.
51.
PorterA. C. (1994). National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education, 102, 421-449.
52.
PorterA. C.FlodenR.FreemanD.SchmidtW.SchwilleJ. (1988). Content determinants in elementary school mathematics. In GrouwsD.CooneyT. (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 96-113). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
53.
RaffertyY. (1995). The legal rights and educational problems of homeless children and youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 39-61.
54.
RaffertyY. (1999). Legal issues in educating homeless children. Journal for a Just & Caring Education, 5(1), 19.
55.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
SwickK.BaileyL. (2004). Communicating effectively with parents and families who are homeless. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32, 211-215.
57.
StrongeJ. H. (1995). Educating homeless students. Journal for a Just & Caring Education, 1(2), 128.
58.
TierneyW.GuptonJ.HallettR. (2008). Transitions to adulthood for adolescent youth; Education and public policy. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
59.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). U.S. Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Report: Summary of Programs and State-by-State Data.
60.
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. (2010). Opening doors: Federal strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness. Washington, DC: USICH.
61.
U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development. (1995, December). Stuart B. McKinney Homeless Programs. Washington, DC: HUD.
62.
U.S. Office of Housing and Urban Development. (2010, June). 5th Annual Assessment Report. Washington, DC: HUD Office of Community Planning and Development.
63.
Wand JamesB.LopezP. D. (2003). Transporting homeless students to increase stability: A case study of two Texas districts. Journal of Negro Education, 72(1), 126-140.
64.
WongJ.ElliottL. T.ReedS.RossW.McGuirkP.TallaritaL.ChouinardK. (2009). McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Subtitle B- Education for Homeless Children and Youths Program: Turning good law into effective education. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 16(1), 53.
